|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Volunteer for the Great Code Sweep
From: Coranth Gryphon <gryphon(at)healer.com>
Date: Thu Mar 13 1997 - 02:36:59 EST
Dan Cross wrote:
>... > code sweep being re-introduced in lite2. Unfortuantely, this leads to an >... > right now is whether or not this moment in time is a good one for a code > audit: I personally say, ``no, wait two months and revisit it. There's Personal opinion: Keep the effort going in low-burner mode for those two months, but step up the heat when things are more stable. > now could help. Basically, we need an auditor head for each code section,
I like this method. It also makes sure that if someone says "I'll take such-and-such" and sits on it, then someone else will still be looking at the code. If we have enough volunteers, I'd suggest everything get gone over by at least two (or more) people. Also, with a seperate mailling list for each major chunk, those who are involved can discuss issues among themselves which one person is unsure of, so that you don't get three different solutions to the same bug. -coranth ------------------------------------------+---------------------------- Coranth GryphonReceived on Wed Mar 12 23:40:14 1997 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 12:41:02 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||