|
|||||||||||
|
Re: GUI-Dev
From: Harrie Hazewinkel <harrie.hazewinkel(at)jrc.it>
Date: Thu Aug 21 1997 - 03:40:03 EDT
Randy Terbush wrote:
Depending on the mod_snmp integeration the current protocol engine is not able to do writes and so. I deliberatly took them first out, because this functionality wasn't needed. Also the tool to generate C code from a MIB is a bit changed, since my first relaese of mod_snmp. So if we ship in the protocol engine of my tool it is directly able to do writes as well. The tool still need an extension in order to generate also all SNMP-set funtions. But that can be done quit quickly.
URL' for the
(This is also placed by Randy at Apache-site) SNMP-toolkit -> http://www-musiq.jrc.it/~harrie/smut/smut_2b1.tar.gz Writing such a config MIB is not that difficult aspecially if I get a view on what the configuration toolkit does at the front and how Apache needed to write this internally. This could be based on some earlier given object class example.
About mod_monitor and mod_snmp.
>
Correct me if I am wrong, but is the concept of the configuration server
bnot based on the fact that the Apache-server and the configuration
server
>
The new SNMPv3 WG of the IETF is creating security for the SNMP
protocol.
Although my comments look like I plea guilty for the SNMP-solution, I am certainly not against any other solution. But I agree with Randy that we should keep the required protocols to the minimum (maybe one). HH -- 0- Harrie Hazewinkel --------------------------------------0 email:harrie.hazewinkel@jrc.it phone:+39+332+789384 http://porto.jrc.it/~harrie/ fax:+39+332+785500 postal: JRC of the E.C. - CEO Programme Ispra 21020 (VA) Italy 0----------------------------------------------------------0 Ik ben Harrie en ben 28 jaar en doe SNMP na. MIB, MIB.Received on Thu Aug 21 00:41:45 1997 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 24 2006 - 14:52:51 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||