Hosting Provided By

Re: [STATUS] (httpd-proxy) Wed May 9 23:45:14 EDT 2001

From: Graham Leggett <minfrin(at)sharp.fm>
Date: Fri May 11 2001 - 05:00:48 EDT

Chuck Murcko wrote:

> I also meant to add, if we want to +1 this patch I'll go ahead and
> integrate it with the 1.3 rollup I'm staging. I've got several other
> commits to both the core and the proxy, as well as the separate proxy
> upgrade.
>
> Do we want to consider this for both the standard and upgraded mod_proxy?

The trouble is that this patch implements HTTP/1.0 keepalives - and our patch is a HTTP/1.1 proxy that already supports HTTP/1.1 keepalives, the patch is obsolete.

RFC2616 does mention that there are problems with HTTP/1.0 clients and HTTP/1.0 proxies, so the understanding I get is that it recommends that HTTP/1.1 proxies not support HTTP/1.0 keepalives (although the spec is a but vague).

Regards,
Graham

-- 
-----------------------------------------
minfrin@sharp.fm		"There's a moon
					over Bourbon Street
						tonight..."

application/x-pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Received on Fri May 11 09:52:46 2001

Do you need help?

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Graham Leggett: "Re: mod_proxy patches for HTTP Header manipulation"
Previous message: Kwindla Hultman Kramer: "Re: mod_proxy patches for HTTP Header manipulation"
Maybe in reply to: Rodent of Unusual Size: "[STATUS] (httpd-proxy) Wed May 9 23:45:14 EDT 2001"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 24 2006 - 14:53:16 EDT