|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Cache????
From: Graham Leggett <minfrin(at)sharp.fm>
Date: Tue Jul 10 2001 - 19:37:13 EDT rbb@covalent.net wrote: > My initial reaction is the proxy directory. It is a separate module, but
I've done it so that it is completely independant of the proxy. The idea is that the cache will be capable of caching any kind of content, from proxy content to CGI content to PHP content to static content - whatever. The cache supports (or will support) various dynamic backends, such as cache-to-disk, cache-to-memory, or cache-to-shared-memory. The user configuration will determine which dynamic backend is in force for which URL prefix. It will also be possible to have more than one dynamic backend on an URL prefix - so that for example if a cache-to-memory cache gets full, the data will spill over into the cache-to-disk cache. Currently the main framework for everything is in place, I just need to create some skeletons for the backend modules. Been doing other things and haven't had a chance to finish this, but I'll get this sorted by the end of the week so at least there is a proof-of-concept out there.
Regards,
-- ----------------------------------------- minfrin@sharp.fm "There's a moon over Bourbon Street tonight..."
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 24 2006 - 14:53:17 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||