|
|||||||||||
|
Re: [STATUS] (httpd-proxy) Wed Aug 8 23:45:35 EDT 2001
From: Eli Marmor <marmor(at)netmask.it>
Date: Fri Aug 10 2001 - 05:26:28 EDT First, let me thank Chuck and Graham for answering me in particular, and for the whole important work they (among others) are doing in general. Actually, I know that mod_proxy is not included in the standard source of 2.0.*, officially. However, again and again, I see mentions of mod_proxy regarding the standard source tree. For example, on August 8, Ryan Bloom wrote: > I have found the bug. :-) At least, I have found the thing causing the
The discussion was about a crashing build of the standard Apache. So what's the source of the confusion?
Chuck wrote: > There are CVS snapshots of both 1.3+mod_proxy-HTTP/1.1 and 2.0+mod_proxy
Is there any less unstable version from the last days? Anything for the rolled 2.0.23? Thanks, -- Eli Marmor marmor@netmask.it CTO, Founder Netmask (El-Mar) Internet Technologies Ltd. __________________________________________________________ Tel.: +972-9-766-1020 8 Yad-Harutzim St. Fax.: +972-9-766-1314 P.O.B. 7004 Mobile: +972-50-23-7338 Kfar-Saba 44641, IsraelReceived on Fri Aug 10 10:38:44 2001 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 24 2006 - 14:53:20 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||