Re: [Asrg] Final(?) draft of DNSwL draft

>Reference [3] should probably point to something at Trend; the page at
>mail-abuse.com looks like a temporary redirect.

It's been like that for a couple of years, don't think it's likely to change.

>Section 2.1 refers to the address values used "may have other values as
>described below" but, aside from some discussion of how values may be
>logically ORed, I didn't find this. If there isn't a consistent set of
>meanings, please say so.

Clarified that I'm referring to the section

>Section 2 should also have some discussion of the operational problems

I'm trying to keep all the operational stuff in the companion BCP.

> You might also mention how many DNSBLs there are.

How could anyone tell? They pop up and disappear dailt.

Do you need help?
In addition to our free technical library, Pantek provides professional IT services to companies who utilize Open Source software: Learn more about Pantek's Technical Support offerings Place an order for 24/7/365 Technical Support here Learn more about Pantek, who we are, and what we do Chat with a Live Operator Related ietf.org Links asrg imrg Request more information about Pantek

>Section 3 should mention the need for some sort of email authentication
>in order for the domain name to be meaningful.

Actually, the most common use of domain name DNSBLs is for the names found in URLs in the bodies of spam, which doesn't need any authentication.

Authentication only matters if you're whitelisting by sender, but I don't know of anyone using DNSWLs for that.

R's,
John