Re: [Asrg] Final(?) draft of DNSwL draft

Far be it for me to flog a dead horse but aren't you two speaking past each other? Unreliable isn't the same as insecure.

That said, I don't think one generally needs to repeat something like that in a context like this; it should be tacit.

On July 29, 2007 at 02:04 asrg@johnlevine.com (John Levine) wrote:
> >The use of DNSWLs to override any DNSBLs (or other criteria, also in
> >a scoring mechanism) is only as reliable as the underlying transport
> >mechanism (ie unreliable for DNS-over-UDP, especially over non-local
> >links).
>
> It already says that they're subject to the usual DNS attacks. I don't
> see the point of adding this disclaimer.
>
> R's,
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asrg mailing list
> Asrg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

-- 
        -Barry Shein

The World              | 
bzs(at)TheWorld.com           | 
http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD        | Login: Nationwide
Software Tool & Die    | Public Access Internet     | SINCE 1989     *oo*

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg