Re: [Asrg] Final(?) draft of DNSwL draft

From: David Nicol <davidnicol(at)gmail.com>
Date: Tue Jul 31 2007 - 10:51:41 EDT

On 7/31/07, Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com> wrote:

>

> That said, I don't think one generally needs to repeat something like
> that in a context like this; it should be tacit.

If everything that should be tacit was left out, there wouldn't be much left AFAICT. In general. Redundancy is good, especially in introductory material. Same message in different forms. Few people have well organized schema that integrate new data on the first pass.

Complaints off-list please.

---

Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg Received on Tue Jul 31 10:52:24 2007