Re: [Asrg] Re: Receiver Initiated Authentication

From: SM <sm(at)resistor.net>
Date: Mon Sep 17 2007 - 17:45:21 EDT

At 13:30 17-09-2007, Michael Kaplan wrote:
>I argue that this is an excellent way to use bounces (even if a
>small number are misdirected). I'm not sure what "unreliable" refers to

More sites may block bounces or drop them in the bit bucket.

>Section 5.2 outlines how surprisingly simple it is to distribute
>Auto-Resend to most of the population, and the last bullet point of
>section 11 details how unnecessary Auto-Resend is. A routine
>Windows Update patch would take care of most of the Outlooks out there.

That's assuming that the operating system is still supported and installs the updates. There are a lot of legacy systems out there. I won't ask who is going to pay for all this.

Regards,
-sm

---

Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg Received on Mon Sep 17 18:00:58 2007