Pantek Library
Hosting Provided By
CybrHost
High Speed Hosting

Re: Using PPPoE to secure Wireless LANs?

From: Rui Carmo <rui.carmo(at)accao.net>
Date: Tue Dec 03 2002 - 08:28:43 EST

David,

I honestly don't think a denial-of-service attack based on bogus session termination is an issue with modern WLAN equipment.

Sure, you can flood the AC with a bunch of PADT frames with every session-id you sniffed off the air. People will simply reconnect, and I can detect that (using snort or any other sort of IDS) and lock out that access point temporarily - even if the attacker spoofs his MAC address so that I can't simply lock him out using a MAC blacklist.

(I can also filter out PADT frames coming from the radio interface into the wired segment altogether, and let the AC time out the sessions. I suppose it should work... See more on packet filtering below.)

It is also quite a pain for any "normal" attacker to put together the necessary software. I can sure do the "brute force, random session-id" version myself (all I need is libnet and a custom C program), but most would-be attackers out there can't, and would be seriously stumped by the lack of visible IP addresses and known OS vulnerabilities.

I do some security work, and the ratio of script-kiddies to knowledegable attackers is around a million to one. And even those need some kind of motivation to do it. DoS attacks are not that much fun at this level. Too local, only a couple dozen people annoyed, no headlines on CNN, no real purpose. :)

A much more serious risk would be a rogue AC that sends PADOs and grabs user passwords, but I have a solution for that. I can _definetly_ (and am using this) block any wireless card from sending packets to another via the same AP. It is called Secure Packet Forwarding, and it is supported on Cisco access points.

Do you need help?X

I can also ensure (via ethertype filtering) that PADOs can only originate from a given MAC address, and pull off some neat Layer 2/802.1q VLAN tricks to separate management from client traffic. :)

Any more thoughts on this?

Rui Carmo

David F. Skoll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I believe PPPoE is *NOT* appropriate for wireless security for the
Received on Tue Dec 3 08:29:58 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 12:43:05 EDT


Contact Us  Legal Notices  Order Services Online 
Pantek Home  Privacy Policy  IT news  Site Map  Pantek Library