RE: Is hotspot going to replace PPPoE I'm not saying it can't replace PPPoE. I'm saying prove it. Answer the
questions I've asked, over and over and over. As for good comments it's
only been you and I commenting on it so I'll take that as a compliment.
I'll believe you when you can back up your statements. I consult to 130
ISPs in Canada so if you can back it up it would probably be very
profitable for you.
Bob
http://www.canadianisp.com - Compare Internet Service Providers anywhere
in Canada
http://www.carricksolutions.com - The largest PPPoE / Broadband Help
Website
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-pppoe@ipsec.org [mailto:owner-pppoe@ipsec.org] On Behalf Of
John Tully
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:42 AM
To: pppoe@ipsec.org
Subject: RE: Is hotspot going to replace PPPoE
At 09:17 AM 1/21/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>I never once said you had to use PPPoE. Just said it made following
>back up it's statements.
That telephone companies and others are using hotspot technology instead
of
PPPoE is REALITY, not a theory that I have to backup. MikroTik RouterOS
offers both a PPPoE server and HOTSPOT technology, so I can says that
whatever technology is used, we offer it. Your first comment to my
email
about comparing the price of our router -- brought the comment from you
that we would next be "trashing the competition" -- now you say "pushing
another product." I think you are assuming too much -- and making
strong
comments as if what you assume is true. It is better to discuss
objective
facts likes prices and features and benefits -- not assume who has what
motive.
The point that I wanted to start on this thread is that hotspot vs.
pppoe
is an important discussion -- and so far, we have some good comments.
John
www.mikrotik.com
>Bob
>http://www.canadianisp.com - Compare Internet Service Providers
>John Tully
>Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:15 AM
>To: pppoe@ipsec.org
>Subject: RE: Is hotspot going to replace PPPoE
>
>
>Hello Bob,
>to satisfy the regulators -- is that what you are trying to say. And
> >sure they have a DSLAM for DSL. So if that DSLAM is already set-up
> >for
>
> >DSL then the Telco does not need to do a single thing to allow that
> >imagining it.
> > >the
> > > >if they are on the same Ethernet segment.
> > > >
> > > >There was a proposal to add multicasting to PPPoE, but it was
> > > >pretty roundly criticized and didn't get anywhere.
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >David.
Received on Tue Jan 21 09:47:10 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Wed Aug 23 2006 - 12:43:06 EDT
|