[Mobopts] RE: PAA may not be on a router (was RE: [Ctp-pana] More thoughts on interaction with AAA)

> hi,
>
> this is not such a big issue. However if CxTP is used for other
Else
> if we perform the transfer between PAAs, we may have 2 CxTP in

I don't see running two parallel CTP as a concern. But forcing PAA and AR be the same, or having to transfer CT from PAA to AR first for the sake of running one CT creates additional constraint/complexity IMO.

> Moreover, we can imagine that in most deployment scenarios PAAs will
be
> colocated with the AR.

There is no problem in that case.

Alper

>
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:54:25AM -0800, Alper Yegin wrote:
if
> > the end-points are labeled as "AR", or "node", or "Joe's machine"?
Is
> > the concern just that CTP draft text calls those end-points "AR", or
are
> > there CTP protocol implications?
> >
> >
> > Alper
be
> > > useful
you
> > > think
co-
> > > located?
> > > > i might raise this issue again in a separate mail.)
> > >
> > > Concerning the separation of paa and ar, I'm not sure that this is
> > > really useful but it needs to be considered because maybe in some
> > > scenarios we may have this separation.
> > >
> > > > what about making the aaa session-id available to the pac, for
> > example
> > > as
> > > > part of a "token".
> > >
> > > for which purposes ?
> > >
> > > --
> > > julien.bournelle at int-evry.fr
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Ctp-pana mailing list
> > > Ctp-pana@opendiameter.org
> > > http://opendiameter.org/mailman/listinfo/ctp-pana
> >
> >
>
> --
> julien.bournelle at int-evry.fr