|
|||||||||||
|
Re: [Mobopts] Key transfer issue for pana-cxtp
From: Julien Bournelle <julien.bournelle(at)int-evry.fr>
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 04:04:34 EST Hi james,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:00:14PM -0800, James Kempf wrote:
the PANA-Start-Exchange (PSR/PSA) is not protected > assume PAA-nonce is for nPAA, right? How is that protected (I'm assuming
The PAA_Nonce is created by the PAA and sent to the PaC the PaC_Nonce is created by the PaC and sent to the PAA > > Thus an attacker can get AAA-Key-new if:
my notation is misleading. I'm sorry about that. What I meant is that to get the AAA-Key the attacker must compromise the pPAA. In fact we can replace "=>" by "The attacker must" > What's to prevent an attacker from starting a PANA exchange
exactly. >
I got it, The criteria of interest is: "Compromise of a single NAS cannot compromise any other part of the system, including session keys and long-term keys" In our situtation, the compromision of the pPAA (NAS) can compromise other part of the system. But the attacker must perform other operations:
So this is not only a compromision of the NAS which permit to compromise other part of the system. That's why I'm a little bit confused. I'd like to get a sort of consensus on this to know if is useful to continue with this idea (transfer of the AAA-Key-int). regards, -- julien.bournelle at int-evry.fr _______________________________________________ Mobopts mailing list Mobopts@irtf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/moboptsReceived on Fri Apr 1 04:06:59 2005 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 12:43:10 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||