[Mobopts] RE: Review of draft-irtf-mobopts-ro-enhancements-00

From: Gerardo Giaretta <Gerardo.Giaretta(at)TILAB.COM>
Date: Mon Jun 13 2005 - 05:52:38 EDT

Hi Christian,

thanks for your replay. Some comments below...

>
> Hi Gerardo,

Yes, it can be an issue. But this depends on the device capabilities and not on strong application requirements. Usually, in most streaming applications, buffer size is configurable and has a default value of few seconds.

> Anyway, I changed the text.

Good.

> > - section 3.1, paragraph 7 "The mobile node must compute a

I tend to agree on this. This implementation choice can improve performance.

> > - section 4.4, paragraph 2: I would add references to

Not necessarily. However, even without any reference, some more details can be useful. As you mention RR was designed with low computational complexity in mind. If you state that it can be too expensive, you should at least provide some examples, scenarios or data.

--Gerardo

> > - section 6.2.1, last paragraph: HMIPv6 causes always a tunneling

Gruppo Telecom Italia - Direzione e coordinamento di Telecom Italia S.p.A.

---

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please send an e_mail to MailAdmin@tilab.com. Thank you

---

---

Mobopts mailing list
Mobopts@irtf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts Received on Mon Jun 13 07:06:39 2005