Re: [Mobopts] New topics for the RG

jouni.korhonen@teliasonera.com wrote:

>
> Very roughly put I would assume that this kind of approach of "guiding"

Alternatively, the MN itself may discover those networks. Indeed, one could argue that MN is in the best position to discover.

> mechanism to signal back
> the home network preferences of the networks before the handover takes
> place (or immediately after
> the handover) in the MN is needed. Also a possibility to suggest a
> handover from network side
> between binding updates would be a definitive plus.

I did not understand the last sentence.

>
> Would this group be interested in this topic from the angle I described

I think it is definitely worthwhile to discuss this, and even more useful to write up the problems clearly.

Do you need help?
In addition to our free technical library, Pantek provides professional IT services to companies who utilize Open Source software: Learn more about Pantek's Technical Support offerings Place an order for 24/7/365 Technical Support here Learn more about Pantek, who we are, and what we do Chat with a Live Operator Related irtf.org Links mobopts Request more information about Pantek

Related to this network-controlled handovers is the handovers across different provider domains. Would a provider permit optimizations in such cases? What agreements exist today? Are they readily applicable to IP mobile networks?

Regards,

-Rajeev

>
> Cheers,
> Jouni
>