|
|||||||||||
|
Re: [Clamav-users] Switching from clamscan to clamdscan
From: David Boltz <dboltz(at)cornwall.ca>
Date: Fri Jul 06 2007 - 08:08:26 EDT Yes I did read what you wrote. I guess what I should have said is that I had tried this before you had sent your email. It all seems to be running now but I think I'm going to attempt the upgrade. I've been going through the documentation and it doesn't seem like it'll be that big of an undertaking. Besides if I backup the current MailScanner I can revert should something blow up. Dave B.
Eric Rostetter
Quoting David Boltz <dboltz@cornwall.ca>: > Thank you for the information. I have given it a try and setup the Huh? No way that would work! You didn't read what I wrote, or you way misunderstood it. > changed the clamav-wrapper to use clamdscan instead of clamscan. I That would work, if done right (remove the options being passed, etc). But it would probably be easier, and certainly better, to upgrade to a version of MailScanner that has native clamd support instead. > then restarted MailScanner and it seems to be ok because if I run Because clamav-wrapper is meant for clamscan, and hence passing parameters to it. You need to stop it from doing this, since clamdscan/clamd uses the clamd.conf file instead for this purpose. -- Eric Rostetter The Department of Physics The University of Texas at Austin Go Longhorns! _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.nethttp://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.nethttp://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.htmlReceived on Fri Jul 6 08:09:12 2007 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 09 2007 - 08:34:44 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||