Re: [Clamav-users] 0.91 - high load under solaris

Jonathan Armitage wrote:
> Tom Bombadil wrote:
>

>> Thanks Christopher,
>>
>> Yeah... there is definitely a problem here when using clamd over tcp.
>>
>> Any idea guys?
>>
>>     

No sign of problems here (busy systems, Solaris 9 over TCP). We had lots of load/stability problems with the early 0.90 versions, but 0.90.3 worked fine. Load looks the same running 0.91.1.

Are all the people having problems using --with-experimental perhaps?

-- 
--------------------------------
Adam Stephens
Network Specialist - Email & DNS
adam.stephens@bristol.ac.uk


>> Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
>>     
>>> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Tom Bombadil wrote:
>>> --with-experimental
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Is anybody else experience a much higher load with 0.91 compared to 0.90.3?
>>>>         

>  >
> Not sure if this is the same thing, but I compiled ClamAV 0.91 and 
> 0.91.1 --with-experimental on Solaris 10 Sparc.

>

> Clamd kept dying (disappearing without trace), I suspect at busy times, 
> as has been reported here for earlier versions.

>

> I recompiled 0.91.1 without the experimental code, and put clamd under 
> control of the Solaris Service Management Facility so that it would 
> restart itself if it died again.

>

> I haven't seen any restarts in the log since, but Exim is occasionally 
> complaining that it can't connect to the socket, something you normally 
> only see when you stop and start clamd.

>

> Jon

>

> Jon Armitage
> Systems Admin
> www.365mediagroup.co.uk

>

> _______________________________________________
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
>   



_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit 
http://wiki.clamav.nethttp://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html