Re: [Clamav-users] PhishingScanURLs is dreadfully slow/CPU-intensive

On Monday 29 October 2007 18:07, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> John Rudd wrote:
> > John Rudd wrote:
> >> I can produce 2 examples of messages that cause the problem, in RFC822
> >> format, for anyone who wants to experiment with them.
> >
> > I decided I'd just go ahead and make them available:
> >
> > http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/ClamAV/318642.mbox
> >
> > http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/ClamAV/318715.mbox
>
> I have no problem scanning either file with Solaris 10 and clam 0.91.2
> (compiled with pcre). I used clamscan and clamdscan with and without
> PhishingURL's enabled. No change.
>
> clamdscan returned immediately and clamscan takes longer as expected as it
> has to load the db files.
>
> dp
> _______________________________________________
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

$ clamscan 318715.mbox
318715.mbox: OK

• SCAN SUMMARY ----------- Known viruses: 162803 Engine version: 0.91.2 Scanned directories: 0 Scanned files: 1 Infected files: 0 Data scanned: 0.02 MB Time: 7.569 sec (0 m 7 s)

OR

$ clamdscan 318715.mbox
/home/thomas/318715.mbox: OK

• SCAN SUMMARY ----------- Infected files: 0 Time: 0.101 sec (0 m 0 s

on a slow Duron 800

-- 

Thomas 
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit 
http://wiki.clamav.nethttp://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html