Bug#244334: marked as done (doesn't support images on different arches with the same name)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:22:30 -0300 with message-id <876457wqwp.fsf@lab.ossystems.com.br> and subject line Isn't need at the moment and nobody complained about it anymore has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

attached mail follows:

Package: kernel-wedge
Version: 1.9
Severity: wishlist

kernel-wedge lacks a feature I'd expect to see in any industrial strength kernel wedger. It does not support building an image with the same name on multiple architectures. There is a machine which can run in either mips or mipsel, and the kernel configuration is exactly the same except for the endianess. Unfortunately, kernel-wedge creates two separate control stanzas, which dpkg doesn't like.

Do you need help?

In addition to our free technical library, Pantek provides professional IT services to companies who utilize Open Source software: Learn more about Pantek's Technical Support offerings Place an order for 24/7/365 Technical Support here Learn more about Pantek, who we are, and what we do Chat with a Live Operator Related lists.debian.org Links debian-announce debian-apache debian-arm-changes debian-beowulf debian-boot debian-cd debian-cd-vendors debian-changes debian-changes-digest debian-isp debian-kde debian-laptop debian-mirrors-announce debian-news debian-security debian-security-announce debian-testing debian-user debian-user-digest Request more information about Pantek

(If this is too hard to implement, I guess I can split mips and mipsel
again, but it does make some sense to have them in one source package.)

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com

attached mail follows:

Hello, The reporter opted to split the packages due other reasons and do not need this feature, besides that, he was the only who complained about it. I'm closing this bug but if you disagree with it, please reopen it justifying why you're doing it. Thanks in advance, -- O T A V I O S A L V A D O R --------------------------------------------- E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br --------------------------------------------- "Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Received on Thu Jun 28 20:25:26 2007