|
|||||||||||
|
Re: [RFC] No longer create full set of static devices during install
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson(at)debian.org>
Date: Tue Nov 13 2007 - 07:21:08 EST
Looks fine to me. > One thing that is not completely nice is that bootstrap-base now installs a It's a minor layering violation, but I think it's OK here. Perhaps add a comment to debootstrap that the pkgdetails API needs to be kept in sync with base-installer, so that we don't forget in future. > > except I'd do it by adding: Regularity: debootstrap already does the same thing with dpkg. > We also control other (IMO similar) parameters from base-installer and your The other parameters base-installer passes are ones that debootstrap can't easily figure out for itself. I think 'udpkg --print-architecture' is a stable enough interface that it's OK to use it if available. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [cjwatson@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.orgReceived on Tue Nov 13 07:21:24 2007 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 19 2008 - 03:22:52 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||