Re: Just a thought, and a few questions
Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> writes:
> On Sunday 23 December 2007, Colin Watson wrote: >> All that's required for that, IMO, is for the new di-utils to propagate >> to testing before any dependent changes are made elsewhere. (Though >> versioned dependencies are a useful record, and don't have a huge cost; >> unlikely to consume more than a kilobyte uncompressed, I'd expect, which >> seems well worth it for their mnemonic value.) > > Sure. > > I see that di-utils is already included in pkg-lists/base, so deps are not > strictly necessary. How about dropping really ancient versioned deps (e.g. > older than the version in stable) at some point?
It looks right.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page:
http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Received on Wed Dec 26 12:12:56 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Wed Mar 19 2008 - 03:53:12 EDT
|