Bug#454493: Display PCI slot for nics, if available

dann frazier <dannf@debian.org> writes:

>> imo, the best and more widly solution would be the 2. That shouldn't
>> be too hard and would allow us to reduce the memory footprint not only
>> on your user case but in general usage too.
>
> Might be vearing off topic for this bug, but here's a wrapper I worked
> up (not yet tested in the d-i environment).

It looks nice.

I think that code might be more clear if you change the cleanup step to be a funtion and it will make simpler to spot what is being done in each case.

I see no point in using aggresive policy. It would unload the modules detected by udev and since we provide a small set of modules it looks useless to me. Do you see any possible usage?

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio@debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: 
http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org