Re: [PATCH] Support for "hardware burn-in" stage

Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> writes:

<...>
> The only moment such a split would make sense to me if a stress-test udeb
> would become a kind of wrapper around multiple hardware test tools, but IMO
> the split could always be done at that time.

I share this feeling.

The udeb is simple enough that we shouldn't need changes to it too ofthen and _if_ we get more stress test tools we can do that split then.

Personally I think we'll end up doing it since if we accept this udeb we'll "open the door" for new ideas and people are creative enough to propose new tools and ways to improve this tests.

Cheers,

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio@debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: 
http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org