|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Future of the linux udebs
From: Otavio Salvador <otavio(at)debian.org>
Date: Fri Feb 15 2008 - 09:31:05 EST
Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> writes: While I'm not nacking it right now, I nack it to happen before Beta2 with 2.6.24 gets out.
<...>
This last item is where I worry a lot. Obviously, kernel team want to put newest kernel on sid however, when he does it, d-i will be forced to change it too. For it to work testing images, _before_ the kernel upload to happen, would be required to at least reduce the risk of a kernel upload to stop all d-i development until it gets fixed. Another thihk that I see as a _must_ is that d-i team could nack a kernel upload. This is requred since d-i won't be allowed to diverge from sid kernels anymore (I mean during development) and those migrations would need to be much more coordinated with d-i RM and d-i porters. linux-2.6/linux-modules-extra-2.6 would build the udebs using what list? Still using kernel-wedge? How the uploads of kernel would be coordinated? Will kernel team allow d-i to _nack_ a kernel upload?
iD8DBQFHtaImLqiZQEml+FURAoJEAKCrFV2EuCgLH45/zouGG0k6whkGawCgpfnp
/So/qOzYfRyGUWWmdc8u2b4=
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.orgReceived on Fri Feb 15 09:29:56 2008 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 19 2008 - 06:24:02 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||