|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Metric system (was: Re: SPF)
From: Chris Wagner <wagnerc(at)plebeian.com>
Date: Wed Jul 04 2007 - 07:01:44 EDT
Totally irrelevant and not even related to the analogy. >Also, the metric system (and to a larger extent, the SI system) has an Thanks for derailing this list totally off topic. Somehow I knew there would be some people who just couldn't leave the English/Metric thing alone. I've got a news flash for ya. *Every* base unit of the metric system is arbitrarily defined. The English system as well has arbitrarily defined base units. The difference is that metric derived units are interrelated by factors of 10 whereas English derived units are interrelated by factors of 2 and 3. As I stated earlier, the human mind does not work on groups of 10. It's 2 and 3 and that's why the English system is the way it is. All the units *serve the natural operation of the human mind*. It's elitist to force everyone to adopt a system that serves a tiny fraction. And the fact is no math problem is easier in metric than in English other than ones where ur just dividing or multiplying by 10. But that's because of the nature of the decimal system. A computer doesn't operate under base 10, it uses base 2. The "move the decimal" point trick applies there as well. It applies in every number system. The English units aren't chaotic. e.g. 1 pint = 2 cups. **wow - difficult math**. Guess some folks aren't as good at math as they think. O_O Also, don't confuse a number system with a measurement system. U seem to have conflated them. -- REMEMBER THE WORLD TRADE CENTER ---=< WTC 911 >=-- "...ne cede malis" 00000100 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.orgReceived on Wed Jul 4 07:02:00 2007 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 04 2007 - 07:10:02 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||