Hosting Provided By

Re: DNS: MX and CNAME records

From: Cole Tuininga <colet(at)code-energy.com>
Date: Sat Jul 14 2007 - 14:24:04 EDT

On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 20:09 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my understanding of CNAME records is that an MX may not be a CNAME
> record,

My understanding of the RFC's is that if you have a CNAME for a given hostname, technically *no* other record types are legal.

-- 
A: Yes.                                                               

> Q: Are you sure?                                                    

>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.           
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

Cole Tuininga
colet@code-energy.com
http://www.code-energy.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Received on Sat Jul 14 14:24:24 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Juha-Matti Tapio: "Re: DNS: MX and CNAME records"
Previous message: martin f krafft: "DNS: MX and CNAME records"
In reply to: martin f krafft: "DNS: MX and CNAME records"
Next in thread: Juha-Matti Tapio: "Re: DNS: MX and CNAME records"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 16 2007 - 05:37:59 EDT