Re: iptables conntrack: packets not matching a rule occasionally?
You might try a rule to match "state INVALID", and see if it catches
them. It might be someone probing your firewall.
Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> Hi all, > > I am using iptables 1.2.11 on a well loaded webserver (constant load > of about 3-5). > > After revising the firewall policy I found a strange behavior of iptables > that I do not understand: > > Most of the packets to port 80 are being ACCEPTed as expected. > > But: > * For some clients packets to tcp/80 are being DROPed completely > * For some clients packets to tcp/80 are being DROPed occasionally > > I have the following rules for incoming http traffic: > (In OUTPUT everything is allowed ATM) > > Chain INPUT (policy DROP 5 packets, 1057 bytes) > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination > 2227 433K ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED > 54 3048 RULE_2 tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:80 state NEW > [...] > 5 200 In_RULE_18 all -- + * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 2/sec burst 50 > > Chain RULE_2 (4 references) > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination > 51 2868 LOG all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 2/sec burst 5 LOG flags 7 level 7 prefix `RULE 2 -- ACCEPT ' > 54 3048 ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 > > Chain In_RULE_18 (2 references) > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination > 5 200 LOG all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 2/sec burst 5 LOG flags 7 level 7 prefix `DROP ' > 5 200 DROP all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 > > (logging for accepted packets has been added for debugging after seeing the dropped > packets...) > > When I access the webserver all seems to work fine but I am worried > about these DROPped packets. > > The problem is that I cannot see any difference between accepted and > dropped packets :-/ > > > Examples (a-d.x.x.x being 4 different clients and a.b.c.d is my > server; MAC= value was equal in all lines): > > Aug 1 15:31:50 pluto kernel: RULE 2 -- ACCEPT IN=eth0 OUT= MAC= SRC=a.x.x.x DST=a.b.c.d LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=47 ID=64148 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=52789 DPT=80 WINDOW=5728 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 > Aug 1 15:31:51 pluto kernel: DROP IN=eth0 OUT= MAC= SRC=b.x.x.x DST=a.b.c.d LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=52 ID=55422 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=2433 DPT=80 WINDOW=864 RES=0x00 ACK FIN URGP=0 > Aug 1 15:31:52 pluto kernel: DROP IN=eth0 OUT= MAC= SRC=c.x.x.x DST=a.b.c.d LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=52 ID=38797 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=4404 DPT=80 WINDOW=864 RES=0x00 ACK FIN URGP=0 > Aug 1 15:31:52 pluto kernel: DROP IN=eth0 OUT= MAC= SRC=c.x.x.x DST=a.b.c.d LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=47 ID=2067 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=52789 DPT=80 WINDOW=5728 RES=0x00 ACK URGP=0 > Aug 1 15:31:52 pluto kernel: RULE 2 -- ACCEPT IN=eth0 OUT= MAC= SRC=d.x.x.x DST=a.b.c.d LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=43 ID=47854 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=12768 DPT=80 WINDOW=57344 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 > > > I tried it without connection tracking for port 80: No dropped > packets! So it seems related to conntrack > > Has anybody an Idea what could be the cause of this? > > TIA
> -Marc > PS: The same happens with tcp/21 (ftp) >
--
Hector Gonzalez
cacho@genac.org
http://www.genac.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Received on Wed Aug 1 10:49:58 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Thu Aug 09 2007 - 18:01:49 EDT
|