|
|
| Applications |
| Mailing Lists |
| Miscellaneous |
| Operating Systems |
| Programming |
Re: two bind9 masters
From: Andrew Miehs <andrew(at)2sheds.de>
Date: Wed Oct 10 2007 - 10:29:16 EDT
>> Hi all,
>> What are the pros and cons of having two master DNS servers for one
>> zone holding identical data for this zone ?
>> I mean the RFC and practical point of view.
>> What are Your opinions .
>>
> I think that this may only work in the case of using something like > ldap2dns.
Date: Wed Oct 10 2007 - 10:29:16 EDT
On 10/10/2007, at 4:19 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 04:16:45PM +0200, Wojciech Ziniewicz wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> What are the pros and cons of having two master DNS servers for one
>> zone holding identical data for this zone ?
>> I mean the RFC and practical point of view.
>> What are Your opinions .
>>
> I think that this may only work in the case of using something like > ldap2dns.
I see no reason why this will not work... although probably not practical.
The setup that I am used to is a hidden primary, and two secondaries.
The two secondaries are the servers which are entered into the registries databases and queried by the Internet users.
The primary is only used for admin purposes like changing dns
records, etc
and the two secondaries grab their info from there - no need to copy
the zones
back and forth all the time. - Although you still need to copy of the
list
of zone files across...
Andrew Received on Wed Oct 10 10:29:10 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 19 2008 - 06:51:00 EDT
|
Contact Us Legal Notices Order Services Online Pantek Home Privacy Policy IT news Site Map Pantek Library |