Hi,
I haven't found any cons, at least none I can think of right away. What I did
in my setup is.
- setup a ssh key pair using the root user
(http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-keyc.html) and place the public
keys on the other servers.
- create your records as you would on your master dns server.
- create a simple shell script like so
/etc/init.d/bind9 reload
/usr/bin/scp /etc/bind/named.conf* root@server1.domain.com:/etc/bind/
/usr/bin/scp /etc/bind/reverse.* root@server1.domain.com:/etc/bind/
/usr/bin/scp /etc/bind/db.* root@server1.domain.com:/etc/bind/
/usr/bin/scp /etc/bind/named.conf* root@server2.domain.com:/etc/bind/
/usr/bin/scp /etc/bind/reverse.* root@server2.domain.com:/etc/bind/
/usr/bin/scp /etc/bind/db.* root@server2.domain.com:/etc/bind/
/usr/bin/ssh server1.domain.com /etc/init.d/bind9 reload
/usr/bin/ssh server2.domain.com /etc/init.d/bind9 reload
the ssh key pair is used to scp the named.conf and all the records to the
other dns servers and reload bind. some may prefer a different configuration
but this setup works for me. hope this helps you out with what your tring to
acomplish.
Eric Hudspeth
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:16:45 +0200, Wojciech Ziniewicz wrote
> Hi all, > What are the pros and cons of having two master DNS servers for one > zone holding identical data for this zone ? > I mean the RFC and practical point of view. > What are Your opinions . > > Regards. > > -- > Wojciech Ziniewicz > Unix SEX :{look;gawk;find;sed;talk;grep;touch;finger;find;fl > ex;unzip;head;tail; > mount;workbone;fsck;yes;gasp;fsck;more;yes;yes;eje > ct;umount;makeclean; zip;split;done;exit:xargs!!;)} > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-REQUEST@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
--
linux inside? geek outside! (http://www.geekoutside.com)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Received on Thu Oct 11 20:01:25 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Wed Mar 19 2008 - 06:51:05 EDT
|