|
|||||||||||
|
clamsmtp spampd both @ SMTP time
From: Dan MacNeil <dan(at)thecsl.org>
Date: Fri Nov 30 2007 - 21:41:23 EST
Amavis has been good to us so far, but clamsmtpd and spampd seem simpler and faster. It would be nice to be configuring SA and clam directly and to have per user spam settings. We'd like to move to rejecting ***NOT*** bouncing mail at SMTP time. Our reasoning is that it is better to reject an important message so the sender knows to contact you than to silently drop it to do the floor or the quarantine so the sender thinks you are ignoring him. By rejecting after DATA , we will not be sending back scatter to forged senders We understand that this means that we will have bursts of traffic that will require higher CPU / RAM for scanning incoming messages before connection times out. We're ok with this. We're running clamsmtp pre-queuing now per the postfix docs http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html And this is working OK It looks like it is possible to chain things: postfix--->clamsmtp--->spamtpd--->postfix---> delivery ***pre-queueng***, not using content_filter I am curious about people's experience in production. see: http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0601/1347.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.orgReceived on Fri Nov 30 21:42:23 2007 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 19 2008 - 06:51:31 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||