Pantek Library
Hosting Provided By
CybrHost
High Speed Hosting

clamsmtp spampd both @ SMTP time

From: Dan MacNeil <dan(at)thecsl.org>
Date: Fri Nov 30 2007 - 21:41:23 EST


Right now we're running postfix, amavis-new and maia mailguard & quarantining suspected spam and viruses.

Amavis has been good to us so far, but clamsmtpd and spampd seem simpler and faster. It would be nice to be configuring SA and clam directly and to have per user spam settings.

We'd like to move to rejecting ***NOT*** bouncing mail at SMTP time. Our reasoning is that it is better to reject an important message so the sender knows to contact you than to silently drop it to do the floor or the quarantine so the sender thinks you are ignoring him.

By rejecting after DATA , we will not be sending back scatter to forged senders

We understand that this means that we will have bursts of traffic that will require higher CPU / RAM for scanning incoming messages   before connection times out. We're ok with this.

We're running clamsmtp pre-queuing now per the postfix docs

        http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html

And this is working OK

Do you need help?X

It looks like it is possible to chain things:

postfix--->clamsmtp--->spamtpd--->postfix---> delivery

  ***pre-queueng***, not using content_filter

I am curious about people's experience in production. see:

        http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0601/1347.html

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Received on Fri Nov 30 21:42:23 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 19 2008 - 06:51:31 EDT


Contact Us  Legal Notices  Order Services Online 
Pantek Home  Privacy Policy  IT news  Site Map  Pantek Library