Hosting Provided By

Re: clamsmtp spampd both @ SMTP time

From: PÁSZTOR György <pasztor(at)sagv5.gyakg.u-szeged.hu>
Date: Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:05:03 EST

Hi,

"Dan MacNeil" <dan@thecsl.org> írta 2007-11-30 21:41-kor:
> By rejecting after DATA , we will not be sending back scatter to
> forged senders

Have you already tried spamassasin-milter and clamav-milter packages? They can say reject after DATA.
If you do a greylisting before DATA (eg. with postgrey), than many zombies will bounce back from you, and it will relese many cpu time for you;-)

Cheers,
-- -------[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]------- --

PÁSZTOR György                          e-mail: pasztor@fsn.hu
Free Software Network (FSN.HU)     phone @work: +36 62 54 6666
URL: 
http://people.fsn.hu/~pasztor/      cell.: +3620 512 3335

Received on Sat Dec 1 06:22:31 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Leonardo Boselli: "Re: problemas con recepcion de correos en servidor postfix"
Previous message: Leonardo Boselli: "Re: problemas con recepcion de correos en servidor postfix"
In reply to: Dan MacNeil: "clamsmtp spampd both @ SMTP time"
Next in thread: Dan MacNeil: "Re: clamsmtp spampd both @ SMTP time"
Reply: Dan MacNeil: "Re: clamsmtp spampd both @ SMTP time"
Reply: Dan MacNeil: "clamsmtp & spampd vs spamassasin-milter & clamav-milter for SMTP time REJECT"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 19 2008 - 06:51:32 EDT