|
|||||||||||
|
Re: alternatives to suexec in etch apache2
From: Dan MacNeil <dan(at)thecsl.org>
Date: Sun Feb 17 2008 - 21:23:56 EST
Craig Sanders wrote:
>> Under sarge, woody & potato we ran modified version of suexec that >> skipped the check for group writable cgi files. > > i've never liked suexec. it's way to rigid and unconfigurable. and, > unfortunately, the way it expects vhosts to be set up (esp. directory > layout) is completely unlike the way i set mine up. > > i used cgiwrap for a long while, it's far more flexible. > > [snip] > then i discovered apache2-mpm-itk (last year, i think). it's what i use apache2-mpm-itk looks good. It would allow us to eliminate libapache2-mod-suphp and php4-cgi The "highly experimental" bit seems like the author is more cautious than most people.. From the home page ...It has been running in production for a few years for some large sites. Does apache2-mpm-itk require a seperate process for each vhost ? This was not clear to me from the docs and perhaps others would be curious. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.orgReceived on Sun Feb 17 21:24:32 2008 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 19 2008 - 06:52:59 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||