Re: alternatives to suexec in etch apache2
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 08:25:17PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 11:30:32PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > > On my systems, I have a dedicated apache process per virtual host, and > > use another apache as reverse proxy to route incoming requests to the > > correct virtual host. But that, of course, doesn't scale very well, > > and it not (yet) well supported by the Debian apache2 packages. > > > That is the approach I take on my systems. The manual hacking I have to > do to make that work is really annoying. Perhaps future versions of the > apache2 package will lend themselves more to this approach.
I have filed bugs against apache2 with patches against utility scripts
to better support this. A few of them have been recently applied one
or another way in sid, but not all of them. Things are progressing
slowly, but they're moving.
Greetings
Marc
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 3221 2323190
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Received on Mon Feb 18 02:26:23 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Wed Mar 19 2008 - 06:52:59 EDT
|