Re: alternatives to suexec in etch apache2

On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 06:26:35PM -0500, Dan MacNeil wrote:
> If I understood Craig correctly, I suspect that forking a process for
> every request is a bit more expensive than having the same process
> service a bunch of requests.

it's not quite for every request, it's for every connection - which can deliver numerous requests with http keep-alive.

btw, i meant to mention in my last post that the upstream author is also the debian maintainer of the package: Steinar H. Gunderson <sesse@debian.org>

craig

-- 
craig sanders 

BOFH excuse #396:

Mail server hit by UniSpammer.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org