|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Suspend to disk?
From: Bob Proulx <bob(at)proulx.com>
Date: Mon Aug 27 2007 - 21:14:43 EDT
The old original apt-proxy was quite good. The new rewritten in apt-proxy I had problems with and switched to apt-cacher. Then apt-cacher has been having creeping featurism and has been breaking for me. I am now going to look into switching to approx. Others use Squid web proxies to cache the files. > > For home usage, updating laptops from a PC, it's way too much I disagree that it is too much overhead. When the proxies were simple and worked then everything was simple and it worked.(!) The overhead was acceptable. It is only when there are problems that cause it not to be worthwhile. Whether all of this is worth is really depends upon your download speed and the remote depot response time. A slow connection makes it worthwhile even when there are problems. > > You always have to care to sync two config dirs (apt and apt-cacher avoids the apt-proxy configuration and is a transparent proxy. > > adjust the firewall, deal with update troubles (for The older apt-proxy was written in portable shell. One of my problems with the new apt-proxy is that now that it has been written in python it has also been broken by python instabilities. In any case I am suffering through apt-cacher Bug#385961 right now. > That's kind of what I figured. The two other machines are remote and Look into 'apt-move'. You can use it to build an apt depot from a directory of deb files, such as /var/cache/apt/archives/. Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-laptop-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.orgReceived on Mon Aug 27 21:14:58 2007 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Oct 07 2007 - 07:56:09 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||