|
|||||||||||
|
Re: security.d.o packages for etch built on sarge
From: Steve Kemp <skx(at)debian.org>
Date: Sat Jun 30 2007 - 21:39:37 EDT
Etch security updates *should* be built upon Etch. Sarge updates *should* be built upon Sarge. Anything else is liable to break and is a bug which should be fixed with an update. I've checked the build-logs I've got access to (all except i386) and they seem fine. is it just i386 you see this behavior upon? Do other people see this too, or is it a potentially broken system you're installing upon (I have to ask; some people still have mixed sources.lists files..) Steve -- Debian GNU/Linux System Administration http://www.debian-administration.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.orgReceived on Sat Jun 30 21:57:13 2007 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jun 30 2007 - 22:00:02 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||