Re: security.d.o packages for etch built on sarge

On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 02:39:37AM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Sun Jul 01, 2007 at 00:59:24 +0200, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:56:07PM +0200, karol wrote:
> >
> > > It looks like etch's security updates were built on sarge. python2.3
> > > isn't available in etch making ekg's security update uninstallable.
> >
> > I would be _very_ happy to hear _any_ comment on that. I'll probably
> > ask debian-devel if I won't get any answer in next few days.
>
> Etch security updates *should* be built upon Etch. Sarge updates
> *should* be built upon Sarge.
>
> Anything else is liable to break and is a bug which should be fixed
> with an update.
>
> I've checked the build-logs I've got access to (all except i386) and
> they seem fine. is it just i386 you see this behavior upon?
> Do other people see this too, or is it a potentially broken system
> you're installing upon (I have to ask; some people still have mixed
> sources.lists files..)

i just tried on a pretty fresh etch install (i386), error message is spanish, but i think understandable:
Los siguientes paquetes tienen dependencias incumplidas:   ekg: Depende: python2.3 (>= 2.3) pero no es instalable   E: Paquetes rotos

so maybe someone should file "grave"? against ekg?

cheers  

  --Jan

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


application/pgp-signature attachment: Digital signature