Hosting Provided By

Re: security.d.o packages for etch built on sarge

From: Karol Lewandowski <kl(at)jasmine.eu.org>
Date: Sun Jul 01 2007 - 07:30:25 EDT

On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 02:39:37AM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Sun Jul 01, 2007 at 00:59:24 +0200, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:56:07PM +0200, karol wrote:
> >
> > > It looks like etch's security updates were built on sarge. python2.3
> > > isn't available in etch making ekg's security update uninstallable.
> >
> > I would be _very_ happy to hear _any_ comment on that. I'll probably
> > ask debian-devel if I won't get any answer in next few days.
>
> Etch security updates *should* be built upon Etch. Sarge updates
> *should* be built upon Sarge.
>
> Anything else is liable to break and is a bug which should be fixed
> with an update.
>
> I've checked the build-logs I've got access to (all except i386) and
> they seem fine. is it just i386 you see this behavior upon?
> Do other people see this too, or is it a potentially broken system
> you're installing upon (I have to ask; some people still have mixed
> sources.lists files..)

Yes, i386 is broken. amd64 is ok:

  karol(at)bizet:~$ wget -qO- http://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/etch/updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages.bz2 | bzip2 -d | egrep -A7 'Package: ekg'   Package: ekg
  Priority: optional
  Section: net
  Installed-Size: 812
  Maintainer: Marcin Owsiany <porridge@debian.org>   Architecture: amd64
  Version: 1:1.7~rc2-1etch1
  Depends: libaspell15 (>= 0.60), libc6 (>= 2.3.5-1), libgadu3 (>= 1:1.7~rc2), libgsm1 (>= 1.0.10), libjpeg62, libncurses5 (>= 5.4-5), libssl0.9.8 (>= 0.9.8c-1), python2.4 (>= 2.3.90), zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.1)

i386 has broken deps:

  karol(at)bizet:~$ wget -qO- http://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/etch/updates/main/binary-i386/Packages.bz2 | bzip2 -d | egrep -A7 'Package: ekg'   Package: ekg
  Priority: optional
  Section: net
  Installed-Size: 740
  Maintainer: Marcin Owsiany <porridge@debian.org>   Architecture: i386
  Version: 1:1.7~rc2-1etch1
  Depends: libaspell15 (>= 0.60), libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libgadu3 (>= 1:1.7~rc2), libgsm1 (>= 1.0.10), libjpeg62, libncurses5 (>= 5.4-1), libssl0.9.7, python2.3 (>= 2.3), zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.1)

However, blender security update is wrong on both arches. According to http://packages.debian.org/stable/graphics/blender package version is 2.42a-7, while security archive has 2.37a-1.1etch1.

  karol(at)bizet:~$ wget -qO- http://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/etch/updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages.bz2 | bzip2 -d | egrep -A6 'Package: blender'   Package: blender
  Priority: optional
  Section: graphics
  Installed-Size: 11148
  Maintainer: Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) <mhatta@debian.org>   Architecture: amd64
  Version: 2.37a-1.1etch1

Thanks (and sorry for private reply Steve, I've subscribed to debian-security recently).

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Received on Sun Jul 1 07:30:52 2007

Do you need help?

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Vladimir Strycek: "Encrypting drive"
Previous message: Bernd Zeimetz: "Re: security.d.o packages for etch built on sarge"
In reply to: Steve Kemp: "Re: security.d.o packages for etch built on sarge"
Next in thread: Karol Lewandowski: "Re: security.d.o packages for etch built on sarge"
Reply: Karol Lewandowski: "Re: security.d.o packages for etch built on sarge"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 07:40:02 EDT