Hosting Provided By

Re: debsums: no md5sums for a lot of important packages on sarge

From: Benedikt Hallinger <b.hallinger(at)skyforcesystems.de>
Date: Mon Oct 08 2007 - 03:39:24 EDT

> So I believe the above output NOT to be the result of a breach. My
> question is, is it acceptable to have so many important and widely
> used packages in *stable* without MD5 checksums?

Hi, sarge is not stable anymore. Etch went stable as of August 15th.

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Received on Mon Oct 8 03:54:30 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Michael Ablassmeier: "Re: debsums: no md5sums for a lot of important packages on sarge"
Previous message: Alexandros Papadopoulos: "debsums: no md5sums for a lot of important packages on sarge"
In reply to: Alexandros Papadopoulos: "debsums: no md5sums for a lot of important packages on sarge"
Next in thread: Michael Ablassmeier: "Re: debsums: no md5sums for a lot of important packages on sarge"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 19 2008 - 06:54:10 EDT