|
|||||||||||
|
Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1409-2] New samba packages fix several vulnerabilities
From: Ewen McNeill <ewen(at)naos.co.nz>
Date: Mon Nov 26 2007 - 18:00:05 EST
There doesn't appear to be a i386 package for Samba version 3.0.24-6etch7 on any of the security.debian.org servers. Only a 3.0.24-6etch6 package. AMD64 and most other architectures seem to have 3.0.24-6etch7 and not 3.0.24-6etch6 packages. According to the change log this means that one regression is missing in the i386 packages (6etch6):
-=- cut here -=-
For example:
-=- cut here -=-
-rw-rw-r-- 1 1176 1176 2381022 May 30 10:30 samba-common_3.0.24-6etch4_i386.deb -rw-rw-r-- 1 1176 1176 2381196 Nov 15 22:35 samba-common_3.0.24-6etch5_i386.deb -rw-rw-r-- 1 1176 1176 2381264 Nov 23 13:25 samba-common_3.0.24-6etch6_i386.deb226 Directory send OK. ftp> ls samba-common*etch*amd64* 227 Entering Passive Mode (128,31,0,36,172,122) 150 Here comes the directory listing. -rw-rw-r-- 1 1176 1176 2596688 Jun 01 07:00 samba-common_3.0.24-6etch4_amd64.deb -rw-rw-r-- 1 1176 1176 2595582 Nov 22 20:45 samba-common_3.0.24-6etch5_amd64.deb -rw-rw-r-- 1 1176 1176 2597004 Nov 24 11:05 samba-common_3.0.24-6etch7_amd64.deb226 Directory send OK. ftp> -=- cut here -=- (But the same thing seems to be true for the entire samba suite.) Will new i386 packages be built? Or does that regression not affect i386? Ewen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.orgReceived on Mon Nov 26 21:04:45 2007 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 19 2008 - 06:54:19 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||