Mailing List Archive For debian-security@debian.org Jan 2008 By Thread

• Promocao de instrumentos da area medica e odontologica BM Comunicação (Thu Jan 31 2008 - 11:37:23 EST)
• strange output for command ps Lindo Nepi (Wed Jan 30 2008 - 17:48:10 EST)
  • Re: strange output for command ps Stephen Gran (Wed Jan 30 2008 - 19:58:09 EST)
  • Re: strange output for command ps Steve Suehring (Wed Jan 30 2008 - 22:21:09 EST)
• Security review wanted Sebastian Pipping (Wed Jan 30 2008 - 03:40:04 EST)
• Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1479-1] New Linux 2.6.18 packages fix several vulnerabilities David Nowak (Tue Jan 29 2008 - 13:36:25 EST)
  • Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1479-1] New Linux 2.6.18 packages fix several vulnerabilities vasudeva (Tue Jan 29 2008 - 14:42:14 EST)
• syslogd lsitening on per default morla (Tue Jan 29 2008 - 10:11:08 EST)
  • Re: syslogd lsitening on per default morla (Thu Jan 31 2008 - 06:18:35 EST)
    • Re: syslogd lsitening on per default Luis Mondesi (Thu Jan 31 2008 - 19:04:22 EST)
• RE: [SECURITY] [DSA 1478-1] New mysql-dfsg-5.0 packages fix several vulnerabilities Frederic Thery (Tue Jan 29 2008 - 05:08:13 EST)
• Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1475-1] new gforge packages fix cross site scripting wetzel(at)zapware.de (Sat Jan 26 2008 - 11:40:14 EST)
• °µºô¸ô¦æ¾P°e±MÄݺô¯¸ ¥u¨ì2¤ë©³ Yahoo¦n±d³ø³ø (Wed Jan 23 2008 - 19:51:59 EST)
• Why not have firewall rules by default? William Twomey (Wed Jan 23 2008 - 10:19:01 EST)
  • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Thomas Damgaard (Wed Jan 23 2008 - 10:37:15 EST)
  • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Michael Loftis (Wed Jan 23 2008 - 10:29:25 EST)
    • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Rolf Kutz (Wed Jan 23 2008 - 10:56:47 EST)
      • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Riku Valli (Wed Jan 23 2008 - 11:48:33 EST)
      • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Rolf Kutz (Wed Jan 23 2008 - 14:03:04 EST)
      • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh (Fri Jan 25 2008 - 12:45:26 EST)
      • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Török Edwin (Fri Jan 25 2008 - 13:25:27 EST)
      • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh (Fri Jan 25 2008 - 14:36:29 EST)
      • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Florian Weimer (Sun Jan 27 2008 - 16:25:07 EST)
    • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? maximilian attems (Wed Jan 23 2008 - 10:57:18 EST)
    • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Vincent Deffontaines (Wed Jan 23 2008 - 13:11:19 EST)
  • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Ondrej Zajicek (Wed Jan 23 2008 - 13:08:15 EST)
    • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Florian Weimer (Wed Jan 23 2008 - 17:22:41 EST)
      • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? James Shupe (Wed Jan 23 2008 - 18:07:15 EST)
      • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Brent Clark (Fri Jan 25 2008 - 08:44:51 EST)
      • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Maximilian Wilhelm (Wed Jan 23 2008 - 17:36:04 EST)
      • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Russ Allbery (Wed Jan 23 2008 - 18:35:58 EST)
      • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña (Sun Jan 27 2008 - 16:20:48 EST)
      • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Florian Weimer (Mon Jan 28 2008 - 12:43:27 EST)
      • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Jose Marrero (Mon Jan 28 2008 - 15:43:01 EST)
      • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña (Tue Jan 29 2008 - 19:32:04 EST)
  • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Riku Valli (Wed Jan 23 2008 - 13:44:33 EST)
    • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? William Twomey (Wed Jan 23 2008 - 14:15:18 EST)
      • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Riku Valli (Wed Jan 23 2008 - 16:31:54 EST)
      • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña (Sun Jan 27 2008 - 15:58:37 EST)
      • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Jonas Andradas (Sun Jan 27 2008 - 16:12:02 EST)
  • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Riku Valli (Wed Jan 23 2008 - 16:52:02 EST)
  • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Michelle Konzack (Fri Jan 25 2008 - 16:57:53 EST)
    • Re: Why not have firewall rules by default? Chris Ferguson (Thu Jan 31 2008 - 02:02:41 EST)
• Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1466-3] New xfree86 packages fix regression Sven Mueller (Tue Jan 22 2008 - 21:18:43 EST)
• I'm keen to get more info about your business Darren Chord (Sun Jan 20 2008 - 10:22:21 EST)
• Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1466-1] New xorg-server packages fix several vulnerabilities Adrian Minta (Fri Jan 18 2008 - 11:44:00 EST)
  • Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1466-1] New xorg-server packages fix several vulnerabilities Cyril Brulebois (Fri Jan 18 2008 - 12:10:32 EST)
• Re: [DSA 1466-1] New xorg-server packages fix several vulnerabilities Nick Boyce (Fri Jan 18 2008 - 11:41:15 EST)
• Tiger and changing ntp server Johannes Graumann (Fri Jan 18 2008 - 05:25:31 EST)
  • Re: Tiger and changing ntp server Jens Schüßler (Fri Jan 18 2008 - 08:28:28 EST)
• Security fix for xine-lib 1.1.2 (needs testing) Darren Salt (Thu Jan 17 2008 - 18:25:05 EST)
• re: [32D-0F221B4E-1950] [SECURITY] [DSA 1466-1] New xorg-server packages fix several vulnerabilities Support (Thu Jan 17 2008 - 13:57:37 EST)
• CVE 2008-0001 already fixed? Christoph Anton Mitterer (Thu Jan 17 2008 - 08:30:55 EST)
  • Re: CVE 2008-0001 already fixed? Nico Golde (Thu Jan 17 2008 - 12:27:34 EST)
    • Re: CVE 2008-0001 already fixed? dann frazier (Thu Jan 17 2008 - 12:31:32 EST)
• Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1465-1] New apt-listchanges packages fix arbitrary code execution Philipp Kern (Thu Jan 17 2008 - 10:35:47 EST)
  • Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1465-1] New apt-listchanges packages fix arbitrary code execution Steve Kemp (Thu Jan 17 2008 - 11:14:51 EST)
• How about carrying this list on gmane? Johannes Graumann (Thu Jan 17 2008 - 07:07:43 EST)
  • Re: How about carrying this list on gmane? Peter Jordan (Thu Jan 17 2008 - 07:13:27 EST)
    • Re: How about carrying this list on gmane? Johannes Graumann (Thu Jan 17 2008 - 07:20:42 EST)
    • Re: How about carrying this list on gmane? Johannes Graumann (Thu Jan 17 2008 - 07:19:46 EST)
      • Re: How about carrying this list on gmane? Bjørn Mork (Thu Jan 17 2008 - 11:27:54 EST)
• xine-lib (etch) buffer overflow fix Darren Salt (Sat Jan 12 2008 - 19:11:14 EST)
• Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1458-1] New openafs packages fix denial of service vulnerability Thomas Bushnell BSG (Thu Jan 10 2008 - 17:29:18 EST)
  • Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1458-1] New openafs packages fix denial of service vulnerability Noah Meyerhans (Thu Jan 10 2008 - 17:30:26 EST)
    • Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1458-1] New openafs packages fix denial of service vulnerability Thomas Bushnell BSG (Thu Jan 10 2008 - 23:25:07 EST)
      • Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1458-1] New openafs packages fix denial of service vulnerability Noah Meyerhans (Thu Jan 10 2008 - 23:37:15 EST)
      • Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1458-1] New openafs packages fix denial of service vulnerability Thomas Bushnell BSG (Fri Jan 11 2008 - 01:24:28 EST)
      • Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1458-1] New openafs packages fix denial of service vulnerability Russ Allbery (Fri Jan 11 2008 - 01:28:09 EST)
      • Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1458-1] New openafs packages fix denial of service vulnerability Noah Meyerhans (Fri Jan 11 2008 - 08:51:32 EST)
      • Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1458-1] New openafs packages fix denial of service vulnerability Joey Hess (Fri Jan 11 2008 - 12:53:08 EST)
      • Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1458-1] New openafs packages fix denial of service vulnerability Noah Meyerhans (Fri Jan 11 2008 - 13:07:23 EST)
      • Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1458-1] New openafs packages fix denial of service vulnerability James Shupe (Fri Jan 11 2008 - 13:20:31 EST)
• SMO Services rahul kumar (Wed Jan 09 2008 - 14:12:12 EST)
• SMO Services rahul kumar (Wed Jan 09 2008 - 14:05:50 EST)
• ÄãºÃѽ£¡ ´ú°ì˰Ʊ (Tue Jan 08 2008 - 06:32:06 EST)
• Goodbye from our Newsletter Webmaster (Tue Jan 08 2008 - 00:38:21 EST)
• Alborques Online Gallery jzarro(at)clix.pt (Mon Jan 07 2008 - 18:12:21 EST)
• Ref:Uk/9420X2/26 tradeseek16(at)comcast.net (Mon Jan 07 2008 - 20:38:00 EST)
• Clean Plus® The Next Billion Dollar Brand - Buy The Product www.cleanplus.com/shop - Distribute it www.cleanplus.com - Own a Part of It - Buy the Stock on the OTC Symbol FLKI Clean Plus® Product Group OTC : FLKI (Mon Jan 07 2008 - 19:26:48 EST)
• Advisory description text Adam Majer (Mon Jan 07 2008 - 14:54:54 EST)
  • Re: Advisory description text Christoph Ulrich Scholler (Mon Jan 07 2008 - 16:20:40 EST)
    • Re: Advisory description text Rob Sims (Mon Jan 07 2008 - 17:44:23 EST)
  • Re: Advisory description text Moritz Muehlenhoff (Tue Jan 08 2008 - 13:35:17 EST)
• ÄãºÃѽ£¡ ´ú°ì˰Ʊ (Mon Jan 07 2008 - 05:52:13 EST)
• UZMAN-Ocak 2008 Egitim Takvimi bulten(at)uzmanbilgi.com (Mon Jan 07 2008 - 03:01:45 EST)
• Dear Beneficiary, Fondazion Di Vittorio (Mon Jan 07 2008 - 00:22:35 EST)
• BATCH NO: (N-222-6747,E-900-56) Fondazion Di Vittorio (Sun Jan 06 2008 - 19:32:28 EST)
• netstat shows strange output William Twomey (Sun Jan 06 2008 - 14:36:26 EST)
  • Re: netstat shows strange output Noah Meyerhans (Sun Jan 06 2008 - 14:56:15 EST)
  • Re: netstat shows strange output Bernd Eckenfels (Sun Jan 06 2008 - 15:36:56 EST)
• Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1448-1] New eggdrop packages fix execution of arbitrary code Steve Kemp (Sat Jan 05 2008 - 11:07:19 EST)
• Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1447-1] New tomcat5.5 packages fix several vulnerabilities Nihil (Sat Jan 05 2008 - 04:33:06 EST)
  • Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1447-1] New tomcat5.5 packages fix several vulnerabilities Florian Weimer (Sun Jan 06 2008 - 13:54:38 EST)
    • Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1447-1] New tomcat5.5 packages fix several vulnerabilities Nihil (Sun Jan 06 2008 - 15:52:51 EST)
      • Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1447-1] New tomcat5.5 packages fix several vulnerabilities Livo (Wed Jan 09 2008 - 04:36:27 EST)
  • Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1447-1] New tomcat5.5 packages fix several vulnerabilities Bernd Eckenfels (Sun Jan 06 2008 - 14:14:21 EST)
    • Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1447-1] New tomcat5.5 packages fix several vulnerabilities Nihil (Sun Jan 06 2008 - 15:26:53 EST)
  • Re: [DSA 1447-1] New tomcat5.5 packages fix several vulnerabilities chdh (Sun Jan 13 2008 - 16:10:25 EST)
    • Re: [DSA 1447-1] New tomcat5.5 packages fix several vulnerabilities Moritz Muehlenhoff (Sun Jan 13 2008 - 17:33:20 EST)
    • Re: [DSA 1447-1] New tomcat5.5 packages fix several vulnerabilities Nihil (Mon Jan 14 2008 - 03:17:44 EST)
• Install process certification Keyser Söze (Fri Jan 04 2008 - 06:15:35 EST)
  • Re: Install process certification paddy(at)panici.net (Fri Jan 04 2008 - 12:22:42 EST)
• Are the patches from the recent DSAs incorporated into the current etch kernel? Arne Nordmark (Wed Jan 02 2008 - 04:03:13 EST)
  • Re: Are the patches from the recent DSAs incorporated into the current etch kernel? dann frazier (Wed Jan 02 2008 - 10:00:26 EST)
    • Re: Are the patches from the recent DSAs incorporated into the current etch kernel? Arne Nordmark (Wed Jan 02 2008 - 10:49:57 EST)
• www.pymexpress.com.ar Pls check this new site (Tue Jan 01 2008 - 06:00:50 EST)
  • Re: www.juniorguide.com Jack T Mudge III (Tue Jan 01 2008 - 04:39:10 EST)
    • Re: www.juniorguide.com Michelle Konzack (Mon Jan 07 2008 - 07:06:59 EST)
  • Re: www.juniorguide.com Florian Weimer (Tue Jan 01 2008 - 09:56:22 EST)
  • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Mike Wang (Tue Jan 01 2008 - 19:10:02 EST)
  • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Luis Mondesi (Tue Jan 01 2008 - 20:21:19 EST)
  • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Mike Wang (Tue Jan 01 2008 - 21:46:28 EST)
  • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Mike Wang (Thu Jan 03 2008 - 18:18:31 EST)
  • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Luis Mondesi (Thu Jan 03 2008 - 20:55:11 EST)
  • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Mike Wang (Thu Jan 03 2008 - 22:13:40 EST)
  • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Rick Moen (Fri Jan 04 2008 - 01:46:48 EST)
  • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Felipe Figueiredo (Fri Jan 04 2008 - 03:04:50 EST)
  • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Steve Kemp (Fri Jan 04 2008 - 04:59:18 EST)
  • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Javier Fernandez-Sanguino (Fri Jan 04 2008 - 06:37:35 EST)
  • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Rick Moen (Fri Jan 04 2008 - 07:06:27 EST)
  • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Raphael Geissert (Fri Jan 04 2008 - 13:41:55 EST)
  • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Rick Moen (Fri Jan 04 2008 - 13:53:56 EST)
  • Update of the php.ini-paranoid example file (was Re: ping22: can not kill this process) Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña (Mon Jan 07 2008 - 18:16:05 EST)
  • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Marcin Owsiany (Fri Jan 04 2008 - 09:33:02 EST)
  • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Bernd Eckenfels (Fri Jan 04 2008 - 02:23:45 EST)
  • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Hubert Chathi (Fri Jan 04 2008 - 14:06:50 EST)
  • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Bernd Eckenfels (Fri Jan 04 2008 - 16:30:18 EST)
  • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Hubert Chathi (Fri Jan 04 2008 - 18:26:37 EST)
  • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Bernd Eckenfels (Fri Jan 04 2008 - 19:50:48 EST)
  • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Thomas Hochstein (Fri Jan 04 2008 - 18:20:26 EST)
    • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Paul Hink (Sat Jan 05 2008 - 11:33:07 EST)
      • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Luis Mondesi (Sat Jan 05 2008 - 16:28:56 EST)
      • Re: ping22: can not kill this process Rick Moen (Sat Jan 05 2008 - 17:53:46 EST)