Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:35:06 +0200
From: mirko.parthey@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de (Mirko Parthey)
To: Debian Users <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Connect to DOS box
Message-ID: <20070625083506.GA24280@stilzchen.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 08:58:33PM +0100, John K Masters wrote:
> At work I use a networked box that runs from Novell Netware on DOS v5.0
> This runs very old accounting software. The box itself is a P120 with
> 16 MB RAM and a small HD (about 128MB). No OS on the HD.
>
> I have managed to persuade the somewhat ITphobic management to provide me
> a standalone box on which to analyse the daily data. Obviously I have
> installed Debian Etch. Having written a few Python scripts to take the
> output of printed reports and parse them into an OO spreadsheet it is
> all coming together.
>
> However, to transfer the files I have to use a floppy disc. How can I
> connect the 2 boxes? The DOS box cannot boot from CD, has no installed
> OS (boots into network off floppy) and has only a serial connection
> spare. The network is 10BASE-2 thin ethernet.
>
> Regards, John
Another useful software for your toolbox could be etherboot.
A few years ago, I used a floppy image generated by their rom-o-matic to boot
KNOPPIX over the network on an old machine without PXE support.
The servers in KNOPPIX supporting network boot (DHCP, TFTP, ...) are called
"terminal server", which is somewhat misleading.
I'm not sure if it is possible at all to run a full-featured Linux live
CD on a machine with 16 MB of RAM, even in console mode without X.
You might want to try an older or cut-down live CD distribution with a
smaller RAM footprint.
Regards,
Mirko
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:19:30 +0200
From: "sizo nsibande" <ooziss@gmail.com>
To: "russ421@aol.com" <russ421@aol.com>, debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Dual Boot With Win XP - Debian First?
Message-ID: <4c924ae00706250119x1ee78ce6s340878d1b6d74749@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On 25/06/07, russ421@aol.com <russ421@aol.com> wrote:
> I want to dual boot windows XP and Debian. I've seen the guides, but they
> all recommend that users have Windows XP installed first, and then install
> Debian. This allows you to set it up with the default Debian installation
> to use GRUB / etc. and dual boot.
This will be some interesting fun and games, this part as already said
will be most interesting as windows will overwrite your MBR, non the
less it is not impossible.
> However, I won't have a copy of Win XP for my new machine for a month or
> two probably. I'd like to go ahead and install Debian, otherwise the new
> computer will be a paperweight.
My suggestion is that you back up everything as you go on the current
installation of Debian then later nuke everything then start over with
XP first.
> Is it possible to install Debian first and then Windows XP later on? Can
> you change the Debian configurations? Is it not too difficult? Impossible?
Very possible indeed, but a nice mind boggle.
> I'm installing on two separate hard drives, so partitions shouldn't be a
> big problem I don't imagine. Debian on one, XP on the other.
Even so if you want to dual boot these two or windows and any non
Microsoft OS you have to start with the Linux one so it will be the
one to overwrite the MBR as it does it intelligently and leaves you
with your windows installation still accessible.
All in all, good luck whatever you decide... actually maybe you might
not mind updating us later as to what you end up doing and if you are
brave and do try to recover your boot loader you can let us know how
you did that exactly... just a thought :)
> ________________________________
> AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from
> AOL at AOL.com.
>
--
Who am I, what is my purpose? To love, to serve and behold the king - Jesus!
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:25:48 +0100
From: Bob Cox <news@bobcox.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Apache 2.2 rewrite rule help needed
Message-ID: <slrnf7uv0c.4j2.news@gaia.bobcox.net>
In article <20070624095129.GB899@hummingbird.wingbarscafe.com>,
Jim Seymour <jim@wingbarscafe.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Running Apache 2.2 on Debian testing and having no luck getting a
> rewrite rule to work. Straight out of the rewrite guide I am trying the
> following to force the domain name to always be displayed as
> www.domain.com even when it is accessed as domain.com.
>
> RewriteEngine on
> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.domain\.com [NC]
> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^$
> RewriteRule ^/(.*) http://www.domain.com/$1 [L,R]
>
> I have tried many variations of this rule in both the apache virtual
> configuration as well as an .htaccess file. I have verified via a dump
> of the modules loaded that the rewrite module is loaded. The Options
> FollowSymLinks is set and AllowOverride is set to FileInfo. I know the
> .htaccess file is being read because I can put trash in it and it will
> result in an Internal Server Error. Once the garbage is removed I can
> load the web page without error. The rewrite rule never has an effect
> and never gives any errors. Ideas?
I am not sure if this helps as I do the opposite, i.e. change all
www.domain.com requests to domain.com. I do it two ways. On my own
Apache server I do it this way:
<VirtualHost *>
DocumentRoot /srv/www/htdocs/domain.com
ServerName domain.com
</VirtualHost>
<VirtualHost *>
DocumentRoot /srv/www/htdocs/domain.com
ServerName www.domain.com
Redirect / http://domain.com/
</VirtualHost>
and on a paid for hosting account using Rewrite (in a .htaccess file)
this also works, but, again, to do the opposite of what you want:
RewriteEngine on
rewritecond %{http_host} ^www\.domain\.com [nc]
rewriterule ^(.*)$ http://domain.com/$1 [r=301,nc]
--
Bob Cox. Stoke Gifford, near Bristol, UK.
http://pippin.co.uk/
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 04:50:24 -0400
From: Hal Vaughan <hal@thresholddigital.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Twinview Monitor Issues (Monitor #s and Resolution)
Message-Id: <200706250450.24748.hal@thresholddigital.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
I have an NVidia GEforce 6800 with two monitors attached. One is a
widescreen, hooked up with a DVI cable, at 1680x1050, and the other is
hooked up with a VGA cable and set at 1280x1024. They are working, but
there are two issues I'd like to resolve.
According to KDE, the CRT is #1 and the DVI is #2 (or 0 and 1 in
xorg.conf). I've swapped the connections on the card and tried to
specify the monitors differently in the MetaMode option in xorg.conf,
but it makes no difference. I've seen a few issues with this. For
instance, when I'm in Konqueror and click on a folder of bookmarks, the
drop down menu from that always appears on display 0, which is the
older monitor. I can understand there are some glitches and if I'm
going to deal with them, I'd rather have the widescreen, my main
monitor, recognized as the first screen.
The other issue is one I don't think there's a resolution for. Using a
vertical resolution of 1050 on the widescreen and 1024 for the vertical
resolution of 1024 for the "regular" monitor leaves a deadspace of 26
pixels on the regular monitor. I know I can pan on that, but seeing
anything on that screen move up and down as I move the cursor is very
distracting. Ideally, I'd like to set the resolution on that monitor
at 1312x1050 instead of 1280x1024. I've tried it and the monitor
doesn't display a thing.
1) Is there a way to tell my NVidia card or xorg.conf to recognize the
widescreen as my first screen?
2) Is there anything I can do to get an LCD monitor to work with a
non-standard resolution like 1312x1050?
Thanks for any help!
Hal
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 08:56:04 -0000
From: rocky <rocky2winnie@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: set up Xserver for etch upgrade
Message-ID: <1182761764.547342.125500@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Jun 25, 4:20 pm, Florian Kulzer <florian.kulzer+deb...@icfo.es>
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 04:01:34 -0000, rocky wrote:
> > On Jun 15, 5:30 pm, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 08:15:13 -0000, rocky wrote:
> > > > Hey,
>
> > > > I updated my debian box to the latest stable release which is etch.
> > > > And the xserver stop working. I start the machine with a knoppix live
> > > > CD version 2.78 runing on 2.4.27 kernel. At start up I see the below
> > > > lines
> > > > [QUOTE]Mouse is Generic PS/2 Wheel Mouse at /dev/psaux
> > > > Soundcard: VIA Technologies|VT8233 [AC97 Audio Controller]
> > > > driver=via82cxxx_audio
> > > > Video is nVidia GeForce 4, using XFree86(nv) Server
> > > > Monitor is KTC1700,H;28.0-96.0kHz, V:50.0-75.0Hz
> > > > Using Modes "1024x768""800x600""640x400"[/QUOTE]
>
> > > > Wile boot from the hard disk which has upgraded Debian etch and starx
> > > > get the below error
>
> > > [...]
>
> > > > (EE) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI capable
> > > > (EE) xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/psaux
> > > > No such device.
> > > > (EE) Configured Mouse: cannot open input device
> > > > (EE) PreInit failed for input device "Configured Mouse"
> > > > xkb_keycodes { include "xfree86+aliases(qwerty)" };
> > > > xkb_types { include "complete" };
> > > > xkb_compatibility { include "complete" };
> > > > xkb_symbols { include "pc(pc105)+us" };
> > > > xkb_geometry { include "pc(pc104)" };
> > > > No core pointer
>
> > > > Fatal server error:
> > > > failed to initialize core devices
> > > > XIO: fatal IO error 104 (Connection reset by peer) on X server ":0.0"
> > > > after 0 requests (0 known processed) with 0 events remaining.
> > > > [/QUOTE]
>
> > > [...]
>
> > > > Section "InputDevice"
> > > > Identifier "Configured Mouse"
> > > > Driver "mouse"
> > > > Option "CorePointer"
> > > > Option "Device" "/dev/psaux"
> > > > Option "Protocol" "auto"
> > > > Option "Emulate3Buttons" "true"
> > > > Option "Emulate3Buttons" "70"
> > > > EndSection
>
> > > [...]
>
> > > Try "modprobe psmouse" and check if /dev/psaux is created then. If this
> > > does not make it work then you might have a problem with udev. In that
> > > case I would like to see the output of the following two commands:
>
> > > dpkg -l hotplug udev | grep -v '^[D|+]'
>
> > > ls -l /dev/input/by-path/
>
> > Hey Florian,
>
> > Thanks a lot for your reply!
>
> > According to your email, I think I'm having a udev problem. Below are
> > the output of the commands you asked me to input
>
> > $$$$$---------------------quote begin------------------------$$$
> > LIJIANG:~# dpkg -l hotplug udev | grep -v '^[D|+]'
> > rc hotplug 0.0.20040329-26 Linux Hotplug Scripts
> > ii udev 0.105-4 /dev/ and hotplug management daemon
> > LIJIANG:~# ls -l /dev/input/by-path/
> > ls: /dev/input/by-path/: No such file or directory
> > $$$$$---------------------quote end------------------------$$$
>
> > What shold I do now?
>
> You need to purge the hotplug package; it has been removed when your
> kernel and udev were upgraded, but its configuration files are still
> present and they are known to cause problems with the new udev. (There
> should have been a message about this, but it is easy to overlook it
> when you are doing an upgrade of many packages.)
>
> Run
>
> dpkg --purge hotplug
>
> as root. After that the status of hotplug should be "pn" instead of
> "rc". Reboot and see if the mouse works. (Check with "lsmod" if the
> psmouse module has been loaded.)
>
> --
> Regards, |http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer
> Florian |
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQU...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hey Florian,
Thanks very much for your assistance! I do appreciate it!
Yes, I go ahead and upgrade the linux-image to 2.6.18 and reload udev.
Now it seems the mouse problem is gone but I still not be able to
startx. Because the system tells me:
$-----------------------snap begin------------------------------------
$
(EE) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI capable
error opening security policy file /etc/X11/xserver/SecurityPolicy
xkb_keycodes { include "xfree86+aliases(qwerty)" };
xkb_types { include "complete" };
xkb_compatibility { include "complete" };
xkb_symbols { include "pc(pc105)+us" };
xkb_geometry { include "pc(pc104)" };
Fatal server error:
could not open default font 'fixed'
XIO: fatal IO error 104 (Connection reset by peer) on X server ":0.0"
after 0 requests (0 known processed) with 0 events remaining.
$--------------------------snap
end----------------------------------------$
Can you give me some further help please?
Thanks a lot in advance!
Blessings,
Rocky
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:27:55 +0100
From: Chris Lale <chrislale@untrammelled.co.uk>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: how to install ntfs-3g from etch-backports
Message-ID: <467F8A9B.3030200@untrammelled.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
baldyeti wrote:
> Thanks for your replies gents.
>
> It seems reliability is not fully guaranteed unless
> one runs under 2.6.20+ with fuse 2.6.9+. Etch fulfils
> neither requirement. Apt-cache tells me I could install
> 2.6.21 (probably thanks to etch-backports).
To install an new kernel you need package linux-image-2.6.21*. I cannot find
this for Etch at backports.org or anywhere else. (You have probably seen
linux-headers-2.6.21*).
I think that you will have to build the kernel yourself [1]. It's not too
difficult and you can always boot your original kernel from the grub menu if
things go wrong.
> Do you
> think the kernel upgrade would take care of fuse,
> and then I'd only need to compile ntfs-3g from source?
You have to compile fuse too - see my previous post. I think that you will need
to load it as a module in your new kernel.
If you have spare HDD space you could install a second Debian Etch system. Then
either build and experiment with your new kernel there or upgrade it to Sid
(Unstable) where everything you want is available from Apt.
Good luck!
[1] http://www.howtoforge.com/kernel_compilation_debian_etch
--
Chris.
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 02:15:21 -0700
From: Daniel James <daniel@64studio.com>
To: j j <jj6419@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org, debian-multimedia@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: time zone
Message-ID: <467F87A9.7080502@64studio.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi jj,
> The time on my desktop is set to UTC. I'll like to read it EST. Is there
> something as simple as dpkg-reconfigure timezone ?
Even easier, you can right click on the clock in Gnome and select Adjust
Date & Time :-)
> I installed datetimeconf
It might be best to uninstall that, it could just be interfering with
time-admin.
> Also, time-admin consistently crashes.
I'm afraid I can't reproduce that in the 64 Studio testing branch, it
works fine for me. It's got a very cool interactive world map for
selecting time zones.
Cheers!
Daniel
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:52:58 +0100
From: Chris Lale <chrislale@untrammelled.co.uk>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Dual Boot With Win XP - Debian First?
Message-ID: <467F907A.9070709@untrammelled.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
russ421@aol.com wrote:
> I want to dual boot windows XP and Debian.? I've seen the guides, but they all recommend that users have Windows XP installed first, and then install Debian.? This allows you to set it up with the default Debian installation to use GRUB / etc. and dual boot.?
>
> However, I won't have a copy of Win XP for my new machine for a month or two probably.? I'd like to go ahead and install Debian, otherwise the new computer will be a paperweight.
>
> Is it possible to install Debian first and then Windows XP later on?? Can you change the Debian configurations?? Is it not too difficult?? Impossible?
>
> I'm installing on two separate hard drives, so partitions shouldn't be a big problem I don't imagine.? Debian on one, XP on the other.
>
I would suggest (but I have not tested) this approach.
1. Create hda1 as primary fat for later use by windows (ie the first partition
on the first disc), then install Debian in the remaining space eg hda2. If you
use hda2 as primary, I believe that windows ignores it and will not try to
remove it, but things may have changed. It looks as though you will be using
hdb1 for Debian, so that should be straightforward.
2. Once Debian is installed, create and test a Grub boot disc [2]. This will
enable you to boot back into Debian after windows has overwritten your MBR on
hda. Back up the MBR [2].
3. Install windows and test it.
4. Boot into Debian from the Grub boot disc. Modify the /boot/grub/menu.lst file
to include windows in the grub boot menu. Google for the details, but add
something like this:
# This entry for a non-linux OS on /dev/hda1
title Windows NT/2000/XP (loader)
root (hd0,0)
savedefault
makeactive
chainloader +1
You may find the update-grub manpage useful.
5. Restore the MBR so that the boot loader runs Grub again.
[1]
http://newbiedoc.berlios.de/wiki/How_to_create_a_Grub_disc_to_boot_a_Debian_GNU/Linux_system
[2] http://ubuntu.wordpress.com/2005/10/20/backing-up-the-mbr/
--
Chris.
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:54:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Eeltje <eeltje_de_vries@hotmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Dual Boot With Win XP - Debian First?
Message-Id: <listhandler=2&site=www.debianhelp.org&nid=8387&pid=&cid=29317&uid=104&tid=79&1176129ef9d8c5b035e16b4cedb4ef04@www.debianhelp.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It is certainly possible to proceed that way. There is one problem: as so=
on as you install Windows XP your MBR will be changed, so it seems as tho=
ugh your Debian is missing. Of course, it you have installed Debian on a =
seperate disk it is still there, only not bootable.
There are several solutions! If your computer has a floppy disk you can p=
repare a floppy with GRUB on it to start your Debian. Or you can use a CD=
prepared to start Debian. Or you can use e.g. a Knoppix CD to boot your =
computer and the re-install GRUB.
It is important to choose a method that works in your situation and testi=
ng it before installing XP.
--=20
Eeltje de Vries
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:32:48 +0200
From: Till Wimmer <g4-lisz@tonarchiv.ch>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Problems using subcommander: No working files displayed
Message-ID: <467F99D0.5080702@tonarchiv.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
today i tried to use "subcommander" for a subversion project. I'm very
frustrated: After an hour i was still unable to see the content of a
working copy folder.
Somebody out there who can help me?
What i did:
1. In a shell I checked out a local working copy manually: > svn co
https://svn.mysvdom.org/project/trunk/
2. In the subcommander i added a new project.
3. In the new project i added a new working copy. For the working copy i
selected the local folder from above (1.)
The right part in the subcommander window only shows a dot '.' and
that's it. Double click didn't do anything. Non idea what to change in
the project settings to make it work :(
Any help would be much appreciated!
Till
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:09:33 +0000
From: Prismatic Plasma <meltedrainbow@adelphia.net>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: stability problem; Asus M2N-MX mobo AMD 64; etch; is it hardware or software?
Message-Id: <200706251109.33845.meltedrainbow@adelphia.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On Monday 25 June 2007 05:31, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 03:19:22AM +0000, Prismatic Plasma wrote:
> > I've had this problem for a while, and I can't seem to solve or even
> > fully diagnose what's wrong. The 2 most common symptoms are:
> > 1) random segmentation faults during compiling. It's most apparent (and
> > annoying) during long compiles. There's sometimes an assembler message
> > instead, complaining about unknown variables or junk at end of line. In
> > the error message it's often apparent that something got corrupted by one
> > character. The file is usually a header and it isn't corrupted on disk.
>
> memory.
>
> > 2) occasionally the system goes wild and thrashing, sucking up nearly all
> > cpu. Sometimes it causes the machine to lock up, but usually I can kill
> > the process that triggered the problem and everything settles down after
> > 10 seconds or so. If I restart the process, sometimes everything's okay,
> > sometimes it goes wild again.
>
> maybe memory.
>
> > Is this a familiar problem? Is it the mobo or ram? Or is it a software
> > issue messing up virtual memory? My bios is updated, and I've tried
> > several kernels in the 2.6 line, including a couple of custom compiles.
> > The problem exists even in single-user mode, so it doesn't have anything
> > to do with the windowing system. I'm currently using kernel 2.6.21, etch
> > amd-64, ext3 fs, and sata disk (WD Cavalier, I think).
>
> definitely memory.
>
> A
Do you mean bad ram? Or is it a timing issue from bios that need twiddling?
The machine's been flakey like this since I got it.
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 06:53:07 -0400
From: George Hein <zweistein@optonline.net>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Xorg crashes when playing video with totem?
Message-ID: <o8Nfi.1$af7.0@newsfe12.lga>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Carl Fink wrote:
> Is anyone else experiencing occasional Xorg crashes when totem is running?
> I've had six, all of them while totem-xine is playing video.
>
> I read the list, no need for personal answers.
>
> Thanks.
Try XINE, I have had trouble with totem not in crashing but in ability
to play video. Thankfully there are alternates in linux should one
product fail you. However should xine kill Xorg then look to fixing
that. Also, vnc may work for you.
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 06:36:13 -0500
From: Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw59601@care2.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: compatible UPS - solved
Message-ID: <f5o9bf$n7j$1@sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
csanyipal wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:32:32AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>> csanyipal wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:19:13PM +0200, csanyipal wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is this UPS supported by Etch?
>>>>
>>>> Inform Guard 600A (600VA)/Line Interractive/AVR
>>>>
>>>> Any advices will be appreciated!
>>> Sorry for this mail abowe.
>>> I find this link, which solve my problem:
>>> http://www.apcupsd.org/
>>>
>> And that site says that apcupsd supports an Inform Guard 600A?
>
> No, I actually haven't an Inform Guard 600A, but will to by some UPS.
> On that site I find that, that an APC Back-UPS is supported by apcupsd.
> So I decide that, that I should to by such an UPS. :)
>
I have an Back-UPS LS 500 that works like a charm.
What is especially good about it is the support you get for the software
from the developers, in particular Adam Kropelin. You write to the list
with a problem and instantaneously get an answer.
Hugo
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 06:45:32 -0500
From: Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw59601@care2.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [SOLVED] kqemu on Sid
Message-ID: <f5o9tb$p95$1@sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
David Baron wrote:
> On Friday 22 June 2007, debian-user-digest-request@lists.debian.org wrote:
>> So qemu hangs in kernel 2.6.21 if you turned off paravirtualization and
>> are using kqemu. End of story.
>
> I am running 2.6.21 with no PARAVIRT and kqmeu works just fine.
>
> Might be that my old pentium-III clunker has no relevance for
> paravirtualization. Probably only applies to newer intel chips and then one
> would use kvm instead of kqemu. K7? I do not know.
>
>
Interesting.
I ran first kqemu with a modified Debian 2.6.21-1-k7. The EXACT changes
I made were:
1. Turned off PARAVIRT
2. Applied patch 2.6.21-ck2
3. Applied Debian LOGO patch + turned on logos
4. Turned on kernel timing.
That got me the hard stop on executing qemu
Then I ran with the unmodified Debian 2.6.21-1-k7 and the problem went away.
I *presumed* that it was PARAVIRT, but maybe not, I never did a full
regression of the 4 changes: too much work because each compile takes
1:20 hr.
Hugo
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 06:53:53 -0500
From: Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw59601@care2.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: qemu + samba
Message-ID: <f5oacj$quk$1@sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
I have a samba question.
I run qemu with an XP client. It all works out_of_the_box: sound,
internet connection with tun and file sharing via samba.
But I wanted to share a directory that I indicated with -smb /hdb7
And that is not what I get: after setting up samba users with smbpasswd
I get the user's home directory that is shared, not /hdb7.
If I run qemu from a different user, I still get the home directory of
the first user that is shared.
Any samba experts out there?
Hugo
End of debian-user-digest Digest V2007 Issue #1841
**************************************************
Received on Mon Jun 25 08:21:50 2007