Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:07:41 +0200
From: =?utf-8?B?QW5kcsOp?= Berger <andre.berger@web.de>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: how to exclude the packges in dist-upgrade
Message-ID: <20070628090741.GC393@hvk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
- Wayne Topa (2007-06-27):
> Bhasker C V(bhasker@unixindia.com) is reported to have said:
> >
> > I tried on the apt-get manual. But could not get to my requirement.
> > I have some of the packages in my deb box which i do not want to
> > upgrade/remove/uninstall during an apt-get dist-uprade.=20
> > How do i specify the exclude list ?
> >
> Someone, sorry I forget who, on this list posted the a few years ago.
> It's what I use.
>=20
> ~# less bin/dhold
Ethan Benson was the author, IIRC.=20
-Andr=C3=A9
--=20
May as well be hung for a sheep as a lamb!
Linux Kernel 2.6/PPC for Linkstation/KuroBox/HG/HS from http://hvkls.dynd=
ns.org
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:08:24 +0100
From: Chris Lale <chrislale@untrammelled.co.uk>
To: Debian <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Some ALSA apps stopped working
Message-ID: <46838898.1070002@untrammelled.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Some of my Etch sound apps have stopped working: Audacity, RealPlayer 10, XMMS.
Others continue to work OK: gxine, mplayer, VLC Media Player.
The error messages are:
Audacity: There was an error initializing the audio i/o layer
RealPlayer 10: Cannot open the audio device. Another application may be using it.
XMMS: Couldn't open audio. Please check that: Your sound card is configured
properly. You have the correct output plugin selected. No other program is
blocking the soundcard.
I can fix XMMS by changing the output plugin from OSS to ALSA (right-click ->
Options -> Preferences -> Output Plugin. This should not be necessary - my Etch
laptop works perfectly through ALSA with the Output Plugin set to OSS.
I can fix RealPlayer and Audacity by installing alsa-oss and running them from a
terminal using "aoss realplay" and "aoss audacity". I am sure that this should
not be necessary either.
Can anyone please suggest where to look for the cause of the problem?
--
Chris.
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:54:42 +0200
From: "robin putters" <robin.putters@realworld.nl>
To: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: bluetooth in etch
Message-ID: <1d9dea800706280354k13a07a05v3d0d5deb2b8ad666@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On 6/27/07, Marcelo Chiapparini <chiappa@uerj.br> wrote:
>
> I wander is does exists an standard bluetooth guide for etch...
>
I'm using the gnome-bluetooth packages from:
http://download.tuxfamily.org/osrdebian/dists/unstable/all/index.html
(sources.list: deb http://download.tuxfamily.org/osrdebian unstable
gnome-bluetooth)
Combined with multisync it brings me everything I need.
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:58:25 +0000
From: "J HU" <judowold@hotmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: general question about wireless communication
Message-ID: <BAY107-F2802B6981358592B89D4BFCB090@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Dear all,
I would like to ask you a general question about wireless communication.
I'm doing some proves with UDP. I'm sending messages between two computers
which are in Ad-Hoc mode.
I know that the maximum message size in UDP is 65Kbytes but I don't know
why, when I send a message of 50Kbytes for example, the application doesn't
receive it. It's so strange because I capture the wireless traffic with an
application like the "tcpdump" and this application receives the message, so
it means that the message is sent and also received but it's not delivered
to the application,the receive function of the UDP doesn't returns anything
how it was descarted...
I have to add that If I send messages of 40Kbytes for example they are
received without any problem, so I don't know if theres any kind of
parameter I should change or what happens.
Anyone has had any problem like that or has any idea?
Thanks in advance.
J.
_________________________________________________________________
¿Estás pensando en cambiar de coche? Todas los modelos de serie y extras en
MSN Motor. http://motor.msn.es/researchcentre/
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 04:59:30 -0700
From: Bill <bill3@uniserve.com>
To: debian mailing list <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: /proc/scsi is missing
Message-Id: <1183031970.6666.11.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi folks,
I'm trying to set up usb devices on 2.6.21.5 but for some
reason /proc/scsi is missing.
I've enabled -scsi device support, -legacy /proc/scsi support,
-scsi disk support, and scsi generic support in the kernel.
There is no scsi controller in hw but scsi is needed for usb.
I need to be able to identify the scsi devices in order to
mount the usb device. Normally this would be found in
/proc/scsi/scsi
The kernel does set up /proc/bus/usb and discovers the
two usb ports/controllers on the mainboard. But not the
usb device.
There's not a single scsi entry in dmesg.
All hints, clues and suggestions appreciated.
b.
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:42:03 +0200
From: debian@fantasymail.de
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [HS] Brancher 2 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E9crans_sur_une_carte_?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?graphique?=
Message-ID: <46839E8B.7060304@fantasymail.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
debian@fantasymail.de wrote:
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:16:58 +0200
> Von: Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile@starynkevitch.net>
> An: Jacques A <tux7513@gmail.com>
> CC: SmartList <debian-user-french@lists.debian.org>
> Betreff: Re: [HS] Brancher 2 =E9crans sur une carte graphique
>
> Jacques A wrote:
> =20
>> Salut la liste,
>>
>> J'aimerais acheter un second =E9cran pour pouvoir afficher sur l'un le=
=20
>> code sur lequel je travaille et sur l'autre la doc en ligne (pr=E9cis=E9=
ment=20
>> la javadoc parce que j'explore Java en ce moment), mais je me pose un=20
>> certain nombre de questions:
>> =20
>
> Par exp=E9rience, deux =E9crans 17" (j'ai =E7a au bureau)
> sont moins confortables qu'un =E9cran 20" wide (je viens de m'offrir =E7=
a chez moi).
> M=EAme en pla=E7ant les =E9crans cote =E0 cote, l'espace entre les 2 im=
ages s'av=E8re g=E9nant.
> =20
Il y a plus d'espace sur 2 moniteurs que sur 1 en wide, suivant=20
l'utilisation l'un ou l'autre est a privil=E9gier. Pour faire des renders=
=20
vid=E9os par exemple mieux vaut un autre =E9cran, je suppose que pour ren=
dre=20
ce que tu code en html mieux vaut afficher la page compl=E8te sur un=20
=E9cran, mais je n'ai pas d'exp=E9rience l=E0 dedans. L'avantage de deux=20
=E9crans c'est aussi d'avoir deux profils couleur diff=E9rent.
> =20
>> ma carte graphique est une Radeon 9200 avec deux sorties (une DVI et u=
ne=20
>> VGA), mon moniteur actuel poss=E8de =E9galement deux entr=E9es DVI+VGA=
.
>> =20
>
> Je crois que les sorties DVI et VGA fournissent le "m=EAme" signal.
>
> Il faudrait donc une carte =E0 2 sorties DVI (ou 2 cartes). Celles ci s=
ont assez ch=E8res,
> et surtout (la PNY Nvidia au boulot) ne fonctionnent qu'avec le pilote =
propri=E9taire en mode bi-=E9cran.
>
>
> =20
Non, une 9200 peu afficher un bureau =E9tendu sur deux =E9cran avec Merge=
dFB=20
(bug avec xorg 7.2 pour l'instant) ou Xinerama. C'est une fonction=20
disponible sur toutes les cartes graphique depuis longtemps maintenant.
>> Je me demandais si le fait que la carte propose deux sorties permettai=
t=20
>> d'y coller deux moniteurs. Comme je n'ai pas deux moniteurs je ne peux=
=20
>> pas tester.
>>
>> Parce qu'une autre solution que je pourrais envisager est d'acheter un=
=20
>> 22" wide qui me permettrait d'afficher plus confortablement les =E9l=E9=
ments=20
>> dont j'ai besoin. Mais l=E0, comment est-ce support=E9?
>> =20
>
> A priori oui. Mon =E9cran 20" wide est support=E9 par ma carte ATI bas =
de gamme:
>
> xdpyinfo:
>
> default screen number: 0
> number of screens: 1
>
> screen #0:
> dimensions: 1680x1050 pixels (445x278 millimeters)
> resolution: 96x96 dots per inch
>
> lspci:
>
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV370 [Sapphire=
X550 Silent]
> 01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV370 secondary [Sapph=
ire X550 Silent]
>
>
> =20
Oui ta 9200 fonctionnera sans probl=E8me avec un 22" il faut vraiment une=
=20
vieille carte pour qu'elle ne supporte pas la r=E9solution de l'=E9cran (=
ou=20
un =E9cran =E9norme)
>> Enfin, je pourrais envisager d'acheter une autre carte graphique avec=20
>> deux vraies sorties, mais l=E0 prix et compatibilit=E9 seront =E0 =E9t=
udier=20
>> avant sachant qu'il faut que cela tourne sous Linux.
>> =20
>
> Il faut 2 vraies sorties en mode bi-=E9cran.
>
>
> =20
Comme expliqu=E9, ca n'est pas indispensable.
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:40:20 +0200
From: Nigel Henry <cave.dnb@tiscali.fr>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Some ALSA apps stopped working
Message-Id: <200706281340.20103.cave.dnb@tiscali.fr>
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Thursday 28 June 2007 12:08, Chris Lale wrote:
> Some of my Etch sound apps have stopped working: Audacity, RealPlayer 10,
> XMMS. Others continue to work OK: gxine, mplayer, VLC Media Player.
Hi Chris. Is this a new install of Etch on this machine, and some sound apps
just arn't working, or is it an existing install, and some have just stopped
working? It looks like the latter from what you say above.
> The error messages are:
> Audacity: There was an error initializing the audio i/o layer
> RealPlayer 10: Cannot open the audio device. Another application may be
> using it. XMMS: Couldn't open audio. Please check that: Your sound card is
> configured properly. You have the correct output plugin selected. No other
> program is blocking the soundcard.
Seems like something has grabbed the soundcard, and won't let go. You could
try disabling ESD, Gnomes sound daemon, if you're using Gnome, or aRTs sound
server if you're using KDE. They are often responsible for this sort of
problem.
>
> I can fix XMMS by changing the output plugin from OSS to ALSA (right-click
> -> Options -> Preferences -> Output Plugin. This should not be necessary -
> my Etch laptop works perfectly through ALSA with the Output Plugin set to
> OSS.
>
> I can fix RealPlayer and Audacity by installing alsa-oss and running them
> from a terminal using "aoss realplay" and "aoss audacity". I am sure that
> this should not be necessary either.
I always install alsa-oss as a matter of course, and didn't think that
RealPlayer would work without it, as it's an OSS app. Same goes for Audacity
IIRC.
>
> Can anyone please suggest where to look for the cause of the problem?
>
> --
> Chris.
Does running ps auxw show anything using the sound. Some daemon or other?
Over to you.
Nigel.
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:57:22 +0000
From: Prismatic Plasma <meltedrainbow@adelphia.net>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: stability problem; Asus M2N-MX mobo AMD 64; etch; is it hardware or software? (apparently solved)
Message-Id: <200706281257.22691.meltedrainbow@adelphia.net>
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Wednesday 27 June 2007 11:41, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Was there a userforum or user review from where you bought the board? I
> usually only do mobo's that have a large number of reviews, to find
> problems like this.
Yes. I got it at newegg. There was nothing there that indicated this sort of
problem. What really threw me off was that with mem in slot 0, upping the
voltage to 2.0 made the problem worse, not better, so I scratched it off the
list of possibilities.
Overall, I've been dissatisfied with Asus. This is my first (and probably
last) board from them. The Asus website is horrible. You can't do anything
without javascript. Even with javascript, the search results come up in a
huge, mis-sized window with no scrollbars, all my menu and toolbars get
overwritten with Asus stuff, and the site is really, really slow.
On the up side, the board was really cheap for the features it provides.
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:31:50 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-15?q?Benjam=ED_Villoslada?= <benjami@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: lpd: CPU and memory consumption (solved.... or not)
Message-Id: <200706281431.50806.benjami@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
El Dimecres 27 Juny 2007, Benjam=ED Villoslada va escriure:
> Only 15 min. after a done print job, now lpd PID 19449 have 61% CPU and
> 14.8% memory --and growing.
=2D I've purged lpr (and have the same CPU and memory problem after one pri=
nt=20
job).
=2D lpr reinstall attempt: aptitude shows one conflict with lprng and sugge=
sts=20
uninstall lprng.
=2D I've purged lprng and printed one page. Worked fine.
Now CPU and memory problem are solved, but with doubts because lpr and lprn=
g=20
are classic GNU/Linux programs :)
=2D-=20
Benjam=ED
http://blog.bitassa.cat
=2E
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:17:00 -0400
From: Celejar <celejar@gmail.com>
To: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: RTF - proprietary or open?
Message-Id: <20070628101700.a8a51aa8.celejar@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
[Back to list]
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:13:38 +0300
ndemou@gmail.com wrote:
> Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Peter Hillier-Brook <phb@hbsys.plus.com> wrote:
> > > It's a Microsoft "standard". Draw your own conclusions regarding "open".
> >
> > I'd certainly suspect MS, but its authorship is insufficient reason to
> > conclude that it isn't open.
>
> authorship is surely insufficient but why don't you take into account
> these also:
> - Microsoft is a company with 95% share in the office suits
> - convicted for monopoly practises some years before
> - continuously prosecuted for the same reason ever after
> - unwilling(to put it lightly) to comply to European Union's court
> rulings to make their products interoperable
> - strongly(to put it lightly) opposed to an evolving open standard
> for office documents
>
> anyway, IMHO: even if RTF is "open" under some interpretation it's not
> to be used as a critical component of OS SW. You will have noticed
> already that it's hard to find the license for the implementation of
> RTF. Have you? Hundreds of pages of technical documentation and no
> license makes me nervous and it's *THE* reason for me not to use RTF
> when the licensor is a company like Microsoft and I want to help it's
> main competitor.
Understood. OTOH, a leading OSS product (Abiword) recommends RTF for
document exchange, and that counts for something to me.
Celejar
--
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:24:14 +0200
From: Till Wimmer <g4-lisz@tonarchiv.ch>
To: Martin Marcher <martin.marcher@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Nameserver update
Message-ID: <4683C48E.9000402@tonarchiv.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Martin,
actually you could just follow the advices on dnsstuff.com to resolve
the at least red issues...
Let's start with the most simple one:
I) TTL of SOA is much to short!
My SOA looks like this:
origin = dns.substring.ch
mail addr = noc.substring.ch
serial = 2007060701
refresh = 21600
retry = 3600
expire = 604800
minimum = 86400
II) For all the mailing related stuff you should make sure that your MX
names are the same the IP resolves to and vice versa.
Another problem is that mx.openforce.com resolves to 62.99.149.109 and
is claiming to be openforce.com (HELO), but openforce.com resolves to
62.99.149.107.
||62.99.149.107 resolves to 62-99-149-107.ifo.net. A well configured MTA
doesn't like this...
You should configure your MTA to answer with mx.openforce.com in his
greeting sequence.
III) Then there is some contradiction in your NS' answers.
ns10.openforce.com ist claiming there are 3 NS, but the other say there
are only two:
develop@schlunze:~$ nslookup - ns10.openforce.com
> set type=NS
> openforce.com
Server: ns10.openforce.com
Address: 81.223.107.117#53
openforce.com nameserver = ns34.ifo.net.
openforce.com nameserver = ns24.ifo.net.
openforce.com nameserver = ns10.openforce.com.
> exit
develop@schlunze:~$ nslookup - ns34.ifo.net
> set type=ns
> openforce.com
Server: ns34.ifo.net
Address: 217.29.159.131#53
openforce.com nameserver = ns10.openforce.com.
openforce.com nameserver = ns24.ifo.net.
> exit
develop@schlunze:~$ nslookup - ns24.ifo.net
> set type=ns
> openforce.com
Server: ns24.ifo.net
Address: 217.29.159.135#53
openforce.com nameserver = ns10.openforce.com.
openforce.com nameserver = ns24.ifo.net.
>
IV) ns24.ifo.net is "Open DNS server". It can be queried for domains
which it's not authoritative for:
develop@schlunze:~$ nslookup - ns24.ifo.net
> substring.ch
Server: ns24.ifo.net
Address: 217.29.159.135#53
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: substring.ch
Address: 80.242.134.171
V) "Mismatched glue":
If this is not a caching /TTL issue, it's really a bad thing. The root
server says, ns10.openforce.com is at 62.99.149.110, but your NS says,
it's at 81.223.107.117.
Your domains registrar should update the root record:
develop@schlunze:~$ nslookup - i.gtld-servers.net
> set type=ns
> openforce.com
Server: i.gtld-servers.net
Address: 192.43.172.30#53
Non-authoritative answer:
openforce.com nameserver = ns10.openforce.com.
openforce.com nameserver = ns34.ifo.net.
Authoritative answers can be found from:
ns10.openforce.com internet address = 62.99.149.110
ns34.ifo.net internet address = 217.29.159.131
> exit
develop@schlunze:~$ nslookup ns10.openforce.com
Server: 192.168.1.1
Address: 192.168.1.1#53
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: ns10.openforce.com
Address: 81.223.107.117
Bye,
Till
Martin Marcher wrote:
> Note to self: get rid of gmail and it's inability to handle mailing
> lists....
>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> actually this is not a debian related question...
>
> i do know but here is where the experts live :)
>
> however, i'd post to the appropriate list but i don't know where i
> should go, since it's not directly related to any software nor to any
> OS.
>
> details below, long story short: Is it normal that when I change the
> IP of my nameserver the parent nameservers aren't updated immediately
> (after my zone expires)?
>
>> If you post your zone file and tell us what version, ip etc. your server
>> is using, we could help you a little bit more...
>
> using powerdns with ldap backend here and all is set up fine to my
> knowledge, i'll put out the dig responses.
>
> So here's the story, we had or nameserver at (using bind syntax,
> typing here so forgive me typos but be assured that it _was_ fine)
>
> @ IN NS ns10.openforce.com.
> ns10 IN A 62.99.149.110
>
> i told our provider the IP will change and now it _should_ point to
> the a record below like this
>
> @ IN NS ns10.openforce.com.
> ns10 IN A 81.223.107.117
>
> so all that changes is the IP, the hostname is still the same (could
> that be the problem?)
>
> com servers still report that
>
> ns10.openforce.com. 172800 IN A 62.99.149.110 ;;
> actual dig output from com. servers
>
> but they should report
>
> ns10.openforce.com. 3600 IN A 81.223.107.117 ;;
> actual dig output from my nameserver
>
> the update was on 2007-06-27 0900h GMT+1 so the question is: Can I
> relax, sit back and wait until the com. nameservers catch up with the
> changes or did something go horribly wrong?
>
> dig info is below:
>
> My old nameserver (bind9 actually, split views, querying the public
> view of course, fine apart from that I set ns10 to point to the ip of
> the new nameserver, and i reflect the serial number from the new
> nameserver):
> ~ $ dig @62.99.149.110 openforce.com SOA
> openforce.com. 1800 IN SOA ns10.openforce.com.
> noc.openforce.com. 1182932271 1800 900 3600 900
> openforce.com. 1800 IN NS ns10.openforce.com.
> openforce.com. 1800 IN NS ns34.ifo.net.
> ns10.openforce.com. 1800 IN A 81.223.107.117
> ;; Received 132 bytes from 62.99.149.110#53(62.99.149.110) in 21 ms
>
> My new nameserver (added the ns34 since debugging our provider showed
> that regardless of what they tell me ns24 and ns34 reflect the same
> information, ns34 will probably be removed, but the parent servers say
> ns34 is repsonsible but I never had it in my zone up to the point
> where I told them that the my nameservers IP changed):
> ~ $ dig @81.223.107.117 openforce.com SOA
> openforce.com. 3600 IN SOA ns10.openforce.com.
> noc.openforce.com. 1182950545 1800 900 3600 900
> ;; Received 89 bytes from 81.223.107.117#53(81.223.107.117) in 66 ms
>
> ~ $ dig @81.223.107.117 openforce.com NS
> openforce.com. 3600 IN NS ns24.ifo.net.
> openforce.com. 3600 IN NS ns10.openforce.com.
> openforce.com. 3600 IN NS ns34.ifo.net.
> ns10.openforce.com. 3600 IN A 81.223.107.117
> ;; Received 111 bytes from 81.223.107.117#53(81.223.107.117) in 27 ms
>
> My DNS Providers nameserver:
> ~ $ dig @ns24.ifo.net openforce.com SOA
> openforce.com. 3600 IN SOA ns10.openforce.com.
> noc.openforce.com. 1182932271 1800 900 3600 900
> openforce.com. 3600 IN NS ns10.openforce.com.
> openforce.com. 3600 IN NS ns24.ifo.net.
> ns10.openforce.com. 3600 IN A 81.223.107.117
> ns24.ifo.net. 7200 IN A 217.29.159.135
> ;; Received 148 bytes from 217.29.159.135#53(217.29.159.135) in 58 ms
>
> ~ $ dig @ns34.ifo.net openforce.com SOA
> openforce.com. 3600 IN SOA ns10.openforce.com.
> noc.openforce.com. 1182932271 1800 900 3600 900
> openforce.com. 3600 IN NS ns10.openforce.com.
> openforce.com. 3600 IN NS ns24.ifo.net.
> ns10.openforce.com. 3600 IN A 81.223.107.117
> ns24.ifo.net. 7200 IN A 217.29.159.135
> ;; Received 148 bytes from 217.29.159.131#53(217.29.159.131) in 37 ms
>
> The com Nameservers say this:
> providing only the first output here since all report the same
> ~ $ for i in $(dig com NS|egrep '^com\.'|awk '{print $5}');do dig @$i
> openforce.com NS;done
> openforce.com. 172800 IN NS ns10.openforce.com.
> openforce.com. 172800 IN NS ns34.ifo.net.
> ns10.openforce.com. 172800 IN A 62.99.149.110
> ns34.ifo.net. 172800 IN A 217.29.159.131
> ;; Received 108 bytes from 192.52.178.30#53(192.52.178.30) in 53 ms
>
> thanks
> martin
>
> On 6/27/07, Till Wimmer <t.wimmer@tonarchiv.ch> wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> actually this is not a debian related question...
>>
>> If you post your zone file and tell us what version, ip etc. your server
>> is using, we could help you a little bit more...
>>
>> bye
>> Till
>>
>> Martin Marcher wrote:
>> > hello,
>> >
>> > i needed to update our nameserver, now maintaining my own nameserver
>> > is fine but I don't know what procedure to follow if i need to point
>> > our ns a new IP. Having blindly trusted our dns provider to tell me
>> > about eventualities i just told them to update the ip address for the
>> > nameserver and tell me about possible problems. what can i say he told
>> > me everything is fine and now dnsreport.com tells me about mismatched
>> > glue for our nameservers
>> >
>> > http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?%26domain%3Dopenforce.com
>> >
>> > Do I just have to wait for the parent servers until propagation is
>> > finished or did something go horribly wrong?
>> >
>> > thanks
>> > martin
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:31:22 +0100
From: Jaime Ventura <jaimeventura@ipp.pt>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: triyng to setup pam-ldap..
Message-ID: <4683C63A.70806@ipp.pt>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
I'm triyng to setup pam-ldap so I can use it with sshd.
Where is what I get from sshd -d, while trying to login:
...
debug3: mm_request_receive entering
debug1: userauth-request for user root service ssh-connection method
password
debug1: attempt 1 failures 1
debug2: input_userauth_request: try method password
debug3: mm_auth_password entering
debug3: mm_request_send entering: type 11
debug3: mm_auth_password: waiting for MONITOR_ANS_AUTHPASSWORD
debug3: mm_request_receive_expect entering: type 12
debug3: mm_request_receive entering
debug3: monitor_read: checking request 11
debug3: PAM: sshpam_passwd_conv called with 1 messages
debug3: PAM: sshpam_passwd_conv called with 1 messages
sshd: cyrus.c:468: ldap_int_sasl_open: Assertion c->lconn_sasl_ctx ==
((void *)0)' failed.
debug1: do_cleanup
Aborted
....
Can anyone help me?
Thanks in advance.
Jaime
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:40:24 -0400
From: Douglas Allan Tutty <dtutty@porchlight.ca>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: lpd: CPU and memory consumption (solved.... or not)
Message-ID: <20070628144024.GB7675@titan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 02:31:50PM +0200, Benjam=ED Villoslada wrote:
> El Dimecres 27 Juny 2007, Benjam=ED Villoslada va escriure:
> > Only 15 min. after a done print job, now lpd PID 19449 have 61% CPU a=
nd
> > 14.8% memory --and growing.
>=20
> - I've purged lpr (and have the same CPU and memory problem after one p=
rint=20
> job).
> - lpr reinstall attempt: aptitude shows one conflict with lprng and sug=
gests=20
> uninstall lprng.
> - I've purged lprng and printed one page. Worked fine.
>=20
> Now CPU and memory problem are solved, but with doubts because lpr and =
lprng=20
> are classic GNU/Linux programs :)
This sounds like you had both lpr and lprng installed at the same time.
Since some of their command names overlap, they should conflict with
each other making simulaneous install impossible; how did you do it?
If you did have both installed at the same time, I'm not surprised that
wiierd things happened.
Doug.
End of debian-user-digest Digest V2007 Issue #1859
**************************************************
Received on Thu Jun 28 11:23:57 2007