Pantek Library
Hosting Provided By
CybrHost
High Speed Hosting
Mailing Lists: lists.debian.org > debian-user-digest > 07 > 070090.html (Request Expert lists.debian.org Support)

debian-user-digest Digest V2007 #1906

From: <debian-user-digest-request(at)lists.debian.org>
Date: Fri Jul 06 2007 - 19:51:06 EDT


Content-Type: text/plain

debian-user-digest Digest Volume 2007 : Issue 1906

Today's Topics: 

  Re: tetex and texlive: changes in De  [ Tyler Smith  ]
  Re: Submit bug reports to Debian or   [ Glen Pfeiffer  ]
  Re: Enabling SFTP under Debian 4.0r0  [ ArcticFox 
  RE: BAD Error Installing new Apache2  [ "Aikins, Ronald (Ron) (CIV)" <rgaik ]
  RE: Errors Upgrading to Latest 'sarg  [ "Aikins, Ronald (Ron) (CIV)" <rgaik ]



Date: 06 Jul 2007 20:16:53 GMT


From: Tyler Smith <tyler.smith@mail.mcgill.ca>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org


Subject: Re: tetex and texlive: changes in Debian?
Message-ID: <slrnf8tca1.2de.tyler.smith@blackbart.mynetwork>



On 2007-07-06, Russell L. Harris <rlharris@oplink.net> wrote:

> * H.S. <hs.samix@gmail.com> [070706 14:21]:
>> Tyler Smith wrote:
>> > On 2007-07-06, H.S. <hs.samix@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > If you search the list you'll find several threads about people
>> > switching from tetex to texlive now, which is generally painless.
>> 
>> Thanks for the explanation. I will probably wait and let things settle
>> on their own.
>
> Things just don't "settle on their own".  
>
> The safe procedure is simply to uninstall tetex, making sure to tell
> the package tool (apt-get, aptitude, or synaptic) to PURGE the
> configuration files.

I thought the tetex packages were in the process of becoming
transitional packages that would handle the switch from tetex to
texlive for users, much like firefox automagickly replaced itself with
iceweasel. Not that that convinced me not to do the switch manually,
but for the patient why won't this 'settle on it's own'?




Tyler


Do you need help?X

Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:58:11 -0700


From: Bob McGowan <bob_mcgowan@symantec.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org


Subject: Re: Enabling SFTP under Debian 4.0r0
Message-ID: <468EACE3.7010704@symantec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms090201050607070201010103"



This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format.


--------------ms090201050607070201010103
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


ArcticFox wrote:

> 
> On Jul 6, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> 

<snipped...>


>> of course, restart sshd to test.
> I added that line to the file (It wasn't there before) but how do you 
> restart sshd I can't find information in the help or man file.
>>
>>>

In /etc/init.d there is a file called 'ssh'.  It starts/stops/restarts 
the ssh system.  Do this as root:



   /etc/init.d/ssh stop


   /etc/init.d/ssh start


Do you need more help?X

or just:



   /etc/init.d/ssh restart



may work.



<snipped again...>



> I attempted a connection using a program called Fugu, the error was 
> 'Request for subsystem 'sftp' failed on channel 0'
> 
> 

I know nothing about 'Fugu', you may want to use ssh/sftp on the server 
to connect back to the server, as suggested by another poster, to check 
that the service is running correctly and is accessible.



You may also want to install 'Putty' on your client as an alternate test 
tool.  I've used both the Linux and Windows builds to successfully 
connect with my home server.


-- 
Bob McGowan

--------------ms090201050607070201010103
Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s"
Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIJHzCC
AuowggJToAMCAQICEGJ01+eLADj0JJQQ6mYYD7YwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE
BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT
I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA2MDkwNzIzMjIwM1oX
DTA3MDkwNzIzMjIwM1owSjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEnMCUG
CSqGSIb3DQEJARYYYm9iX21jZ293YW5Ac3ltYW50ZWMuY29tMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEF

Can we help you?X
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Can't find what you're looking for?X
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Don't know where to look next?X

MXigdjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkg
THRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEGJ0
1+eLADj0JJQQ6mYYD7YwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEApEfRgXaQ3blzWNqwAvXHiELXV7IR
DNtPlNDxF7Pub4fadQxWr0KniyEvTwHxsMUzGfvSowlcU/8zwbXtDl6zZIIjgkfveYq7Le6v
ZPOoncJSIXTLvghY4B2hkvZ3l96O1vZKN2OBqiW1C6mJuSsECpU1/GfMsBvnqZkmhQctoe8/
fDVCkYwQwGpI0WiSwXL6Qw5+mulOLYz9pjtonkwVxiwv5QSnW7phLxXqHPzb4KWs/JqqQt6q
cxytVqdDBYDznYrIhJOMRJVCwd18pBbjS92jmggUed5XPYp++bxGqTF2Vw5WIr038vTtFE7a
nupMYEXEPnvPmL3Xp2Kz8hJLVAAAAAAAAA==
--------------ms090201050607070201010103--


Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 22:56:17 +0000
From: Thias <thias.lelourd@gmail.com>
To: Debian User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Installing Debian Etch on hw RAID 1 on nvidia nForce 430i
Message-ID: <20070706225617.GA23443@mc-thias.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

I've installed a Debian unstable on a Intel ICH8 RAID 1. It's a little
bit different but I think you may find this helpful:

http://blog.mc-thias.org/index.php?title=3Ddebian_installation_on_fakerai=
d_sata_rai&more=3D1&c=3D1&tb=3D1&pb=3D1

Hope this can help you ;-)

Cheers,



On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 09:58:38PM +0200, csanyipal wrote:

> Hello!
>=20
> I want to install Debian Etch on my new box with motherboard that has f=

or=20

> the storage the nvidia nForce 430i chipset. This chipset support RAID=20
> 1 configuration.
>=20
> I want to install Etch on two SATA disk with the hardware RAID 1=20
> setup.
>=20
> I setup in the BIOS the RAID 1 for these disks. I have only these two=20
> disks (2 x 320 GB) in the box.
>=20
> I want to use the downloaded debian-40r0-i386-CD-1.iso for this=20
> installation.
>=20
> Will Etch recognize the RAID 1 BIOS setup during the installation?
>=20
> I find on the internet documentation about hardware RAID [1] but can't=20
> find in there description about installing a GNU/Linux system on hw=20
> RAID 1 out there.
>=20
> Can I install Etch on this nvidia hardware RAID 1, or perhaps should I=20
> to install Etch with software RAID 1 on these two SATA disk?
>=20
> Any advices will be appreciated!
>=20
> [1] http://www.ram.org/computing/linux/dpt_raid.html
>=20
> --=20
> Regards, Paul Cs=E1nyi
> http://www.freewebs.com/csanyi-pal/index.htm
>=20

--=20
	work hard, die young
	IT Stuff on http://blog.mc-thias.org
Thias


Confused? Frustrated?X

Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:37:48 -0700
From: Glen Pfeiffer <glen@thepfeiffers.net>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Submit bug reports to Debian or upstream project?
Message-ID: <MPydnQcNJpeDNRPbnZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@comcast.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 07/06/2007 11:40 AM, Kushal Kumaran wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 10:43:43AM -0700, Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
> >
> > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
> > _If you file a bug in Debian, don't send a copy to the 
> > upstream software maintainers yourself, as it is possible 
> > that the bug exists only in Debian. If necessary, the 
> > maintainer of the package will forward the bug upstream._
> >
> > That does not tell me if it is preferable to submit it to Debian 
> > or upstream.
> >
> 
> Actually, it looks pretty clear that it *is* indeed preferable 
> to submit to debian.  Quoting:
>   If necessary, the (debian) maintainer of the package will 
>   forward the bug upstream.
> 

>From that I can only assume that you are also stating a fact that 

it is preferable to submit bugs to Debian and not the upstream 
project. But you did not say so explicitly, only implicitly if at 
all.

OT:
What you consider obvious may be quite vague to others, like me. :-) 
Interpretation depends on the receiver's experiences and 
assumptions. Here is how I read it (paraphrased with emphasis 
added):

	*If* you file a bug in Debian, do not *also* file it with the 
	upstream project, because the package maintainer will do so 
	if necessary.

Do you see how that interpretation does not answer my question?

Thanks again for your response.

-- 
Glen



Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:06:07 -0500
From: ArcticFox <genkokitsu@insightbb.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Enabling SFTP under Debian 4.0r0
Message-Id: <3b44f5453bc920ca0ffb4a8cc45b09ea@insightbb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


>
>> I attempted a connection using a program called Fugu, the error was 
>> 'Request for subsystem 'sftp' failed on channel 0'
>
> I know nothing about 'Fugu', you may want to use ssh/sftp on the 
> server to connect back to the server, as suggested by another poster, 
> to check that the service is running correctly and is accessible.
>
> You may also want to install 'Putty' on your client as an alternate 
> test tool.  I've used both the Linux and Windows builds to 
> successfully connect with my home server.
>
> -- 
> Bob McGowan
>

Restarted the hard way (rebooted the whole system) and attempted to 
connect from the server, this is the result;

/etc/ssh/ssh_config: line 47: Bad configuration option: Subsystem
/etc/ssh/ssh_config: terminating, 1 bad configuration options
Couldn't read packet: Connection reset by peer

Also, the client system is MacOS X, Fugu is a sftp client for that 
system.



Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:50:45 -0500
From: "will trillich" <will@serensoft.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: RAD tool for debian?
Message-ID: <b84520740707061350u74f26bf2v899a8cd9ff59f728@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

RAD/rapid-application-development tool sought... (web page forms
interface to a database we define)

i've got a friend who's trying to get a license-free solution that'll
provide an html/web front-end to a database... similar to ms access,
but we're seeking 1) no licensing fees 2) an html interface, not a
proprietary interface. we're NOT looking for a cms like joomla, but
rather an engine for presenting forms to interact with a back-end
database.

we've tried to get Maypole installed, but run into cpan
dependency/'make test' snags; same for Jifty.

on debian 3.1, we're using postgres (not mysql) backend, and
phppgadmin for setting up the tables... any ideas?

-- 
will trillich
"The only way to be truly satisfied is to do what you believe is great
work -- and the only way to do great work is to love what you do."
-- Steve Jobs



Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 23:14:12 +0200
From: Yann Lejeune <lejeuney@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Enabling SFTP under Debian 4.0r0
Message-ID: <20070706211412.GA19641@mano.netyl.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On 2007/07/06-16:06(-0500), ArcticFox wrote :

> 
> /etc/ssh/ssh_config: line 47: Bad configuration option: Subsystem
> /etc/ssh/ssh_config: terminating, 1 bad configuration options
> Couldn't read packet: Connection reset by peer
> 
> Also, the client system is MacOS X, Fugu is a sftp client for that 
> system.
> 


hmmm the subsystem... command must be placed in the /etc/ssh/sshd_config, not
in the /etc/ssh/ssh_config.

Check both files and log messages when you start your ssh server.



Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:25:35 -0500
From: ArcticFox <genkokitsu@insightbb.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Enabling SFTP under Debian 4.0r0
Message-Id: <52d316a2fb7980a55ec80f647cbb1751@insightbb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Jul 6, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Yann Lejeune wrote:


> On 2007/07/06-16:06(-0500), ArcticFox wrote :
>>
>> /etc/ssh/ssh_config: line 47: Bad configuration option: Subsystem
>> /etc/ssh/ssh_config: terminating, 1 bad configuration options
>> Couldn't read packet: Connection reset by peer
>>
>> Also, the client system is MacOS X, Fugu is a sftp client for that
>> system.
>>
>
> hmmm the subsystem... command must be placed in the 
> /etc/ssh/sshd_config, not
> in the /etc/ssh/ssh_config.
>
> Check both files and log messages when you start your ssh server.
>

Ok, the line is in sshd_config. I removed the extra line from the other 
file and restarted the ssh server. Attempting to connect results in the 
same error I listed before (Request for subsystem failed...) I don't 
see a log file for ssh or sftp in the usual places and a search through 
gnome didn't turn anything up either, though that usually doesn't work 
anyway.



Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:08:20 -0400
From: Roberto =?iso-8859-1?Q?C=2E_S=E1nchez?= <roberto@connexer.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Cannnot authenticate debian archive packages
Message-ID: <20070706220820.GA18446@miami.connexer.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV"
Content-Disposition: inline

--HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 12:01:19AM +0200, Enrique Perez-Terron wrote:

> Today I installed some 30 packages, but got an error message from two of
> them: samba and swat. They could not be authenticated. I tried to look
> around for a problem, but I could only find that if I downloaded the
> files manually, the md5sum was as detailed in /var/lib/apt/lists/
> security.debian.org_dists_etch_updates_main_binary-amd64_Packages.
>=20

What is the exact error message you are getting?

Regards,

-Roberto

--=20
Roberto C. S=E1nchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com

--HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGjr1U5SXWIKfIlGQRArdoAKDK030crww7QRBDzT2pUAuvay1ZSgCgq8pY
EQPGIiZFHOPp519do0CHAT0=
=JGyf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV--



Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 00:01:19 +0200
From: Enrique Perez-Terron <enrio@online.no>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Cannnot authenticate debian archive packages
Message-Id: <1183759279.7182.11.camel@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Today I installed some 30 packages, but got an error message from two of
them: samba and swat. They could not be authenticated. I tried to look
around for a problem, but I could only find that if I downloaded the
files manually, the md5sum was as detailed in /var/lib/apt/lists/
security.debian.org_dists_etch_updates_main_binary-amd64_Packages.

Then I tried to install gui-apt-key, but I got the same message.
Downloading the deb manually and checking the md5sum against the
Packages file, the match was perfect.

Any ideas?

My sources.list:
deb  http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ etch         main contrib non-free

deb     http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ etch         main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ etch         main contrib non-free
deb     http://security.debian.org/   etch/updates main contrib non-free



Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 00:32:17 +0200
From: Enrique Perez-Terron <enrio@online.no>
To: "Roberto C." =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E1nchez?= <roberto@connexer.com>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Cannnot authenticate debian archive packages
Message-Id: <1183761137.7182.24.camel@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 18:08 -0400, Roberto C. S=C3=A1nchez wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 12:01:19AM +0200, Enrique Perez-Terron wrote:
> > Today I installed some 30 packages, but got an error message from two=

 of

> > them: samba and swat. They could not be authenticated. I tried to loo=

k

> > around for a problem, but I could only find that if I downloaded the
> > files manually, the md5sum was as detailed in /var/lib/apt/lists/
> > security.debian.org_dists_etch_updates_main_binary-amd64_Packages.
> >=20
> What is the exact error message you are getting?


Using synaptic, I click the "Install" checkbox to mark gui-apt-key
(which I have not yet installed) for installation. A dialog shows=20
saying

  Warning
  You are about to install software that *can't be authenticated!*
  Doing this could allow a malicious individual to damage or take=20
  control of your system

  NOT AUTHENTICATED
  + gui-apt-key

The eligible buttons are Cancel and Mark

I noticed only now that in the case of this package, the warning comes
even before downloading the package. Earlier today, when I installed=20
some 30+ packages, the download ran, but then there was a dialog saying
it had not been able to download two packages. Unfortunately I don't
remember the precise details any more. I think I just let it configure
the downloaded packages, and then clicket "apply" again. At this point
just these two packages were marked for installation (samba and swat)
and probably the behavior from this point on was as now.

Regards, Enrique


Call Pantek today for Open Source Technical Support at 1-877-546-8934 - 24/7/365X

Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:53:34 -0400
From: Roberto =?iso-8859-1?Q?C=2E_S=E1nchez?= <roberto@connexer.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Cannnot authenticate debian archive packages
Message-ID: <20070706225334.GA19426@miami.connexer.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ"
Content-Disposition: inline

--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 12:32:17AM +0200, Enrique Perez-Terron wrote:

>=20
> Using synaptic, I click the "Install" checkbox to mark gui-apt-key
> (which I have not yet installed) for installation. A dialog shows=20
> saying
>=20

Try running this at the command line (as root):

  apt-get install gui-apt-key

Please report the error message that you see in that case.

Regards,

-Roberto

--=20
Roberto C. S=E1nchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com

--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGjsfu5SXWIKfIlGQRAg7rAJ99TYxwtg6J5ydgwbxugwcWqyhlagCgiOcQ
Aqksi2LK81ON5gmlTtA6UJY=
=/3z1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ--



Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:40:27 -0700
From: "Aikins, Ronald (Ron) (CIV)" <rgaikins@nps.edu>
To: "Aikins, Ronald (Ron) (CIV)" <rgaikins@nps.edu>,
	"Andrew Sackville-West" <andrew@farwestbilliards.com>,
	<debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: RE: BAD Error Installing new Apache2 & PHP?
Message-ID: <10225B3053423E418E0BA64373BAB7FC2CAE44@FLORIDA-V.ern.nps.edu>
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Andrew,

You may have forgotten this thread. Thanks for your previous
suggestions.=20

(BTW, your domain made me curious. Spokane, eh? I spent a very hot 4
days up there a few years ago attending a BMW motorcycle rally. From
what I see on the weather map, you're steamin' again!)

I'm currently running 'sarge' & am trying to upgrade to the latest in
sarge before upgrading to 'etch'. The problems I'm having doing this
make me reluctant to try & jump straight to etch before I get this
install worked out.

One thing that may have gotten my dependencies in a twist is that some
months ago I updated only libc6 in order to get the timezone updates for
the new DST settings. I've since read things saying that it's not a good
idea to upgrade the 'libs' pkgs separately. Who knew?

My most recent attempts are documented below. However, I really don't
get the convoluted dependencies. For instance, the line:
"libc6-dev: Depends: libc6 (=3D 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6) but =
2.3.2.ds1-22sarge5
is installed"

This means the pkg libc6-dev needs the "-sarge6" version of libc6, but
the "-sarge5" version is installed, right? But installing the newer
version of libc6 is what I'm trying to do. Is it only the conflict with
timezone folders? I'm wondering whether deleting (or temporarily moving)
the 'zoneinfo' directory would relieve the error when it tries to unpack
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6_i386.deb.

Do I need to remove a package - libc6 or tzdata - to get past this? I
don't get what's hanging it up. I may have hosed things But... I don't
get how, why, or what to do about it :-(

Thanks for any help...
Ron

I've tried 'apt-get -u dist-upgrade' & get:
...
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libc6-dev: Depends: libc6 (=3D 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6) but =
2.3.2.ds1-22sarge5
is installed
locales: Depends: glibc-2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6
E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f.

Then tried 'apt-get -f install libc6' as well as 'aptitude install
libc6' -- still running into the same error msgs:
...........
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Suggested packages:
glibc-doc
The following packages will be upgraded:
libc6
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 61 not upgraded.
2 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B/4886kB of archives.
After unpacking 311kB disk space will be freed.
(Reading database ... 35942 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge5 (using

.../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6_i386.deb

(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/zoneinfo/Africa/Algiers', which is also
in

package tzdata
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
....................



Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:13:15 -0700
From: "Aikins, Ronald (Ron) (CIV)" <rgaikins@nps.edu>
To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: RE: Errors Upgrading to Latest 'sarge'
Message-ID: <10225B3053423E418E0BA64373BAB7FC2CAE48@FLORIDA-V.ern.nps.edu>
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm currently running 'sarge' & am trying to upgrade to the latest in
sarge before upgrading to 'etch'. The problems I'm having doing this
make me reluctant to try & jump straight to etch before I get this
install worked out.

One thing that may have gotten my dependencies in a twist is that some
months ago I updated only libc6 in order to get the timezone updates for
the new DST settings. I've since read things saying that it's not a good
idea to upgrade the 'libs' pkgs separately. Who knew? It's also possible
- I forget the exact date when I did this - that I had sources.list
pointing to 'stable' & Etch was already out.

My most recent attempts are documented below. However, I really don't
get the convoluted dependencies. For instance, the line:
"libc6-dev: Depends: libc6 (=3D 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6) but =
2.3.2.ds1-22sarge5
is installed"

This means the pkg libc6-dev needs the "-sarge6" version of libc6, but
the "-sarge5" version is installed, right? But installing the newer
version of libc6 is what I'm trying to do. Is it only the conflict with
timezone folders? I'm wondering whether deleting (or temporarily moving)
the 'zoneinfo' directory would relieve the error when it tries to unpack
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6_i386.deb.

Do I need to remove a package - libc6 or tzdata - to get past this? I
don't get what's hanging it up. I may have hosed things But... I don't
get how, why, or what to do about it :-(

Thanks for any help...
Ron

I've tried 'apt-get -u dist-upgrade' & get:
...
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libc6-dev: Depends: libc6 (=3D 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6) but =
2.3.2.ds1-22sarge5
is installed
locales: Depends: glibc-2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6
E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f.

Then tried 'apt-get -f install libc6' as well as 'aptitude install
libc6' -- still running into the same error msgs:
...........
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Suggested packages:
glibc-doc
The following packages will be upgraded:
libc6
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 61 not upgraded.
2 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B/4886kB of archives.
After unpacking 311kB disk space will be freed.
(Reading database ... 35942 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge5 (using

.../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6_i386.deb

(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/zoneinfo/Africa/Algiers', which is also
in

package tzdata
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
....................

End of debian-user-digest Digest V2007 Issue #1906
**************************************************

Received on Fri Jul  6 19:50:28 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jul 06 2007 - 21:25:28 EDT

Contact Us  Legal Notices  Order Services Online 
Pantek Home  Privacy Policy  IT news  Site Map  Pantek Library