Pantek Library
Hosting Provided By
CybrHost
High Speed Hosting

debian-user-digest Digest V2007 #2053

From: <debian-user-digest-request(at)lists.debian.org>
Date: Sat Jul 28 2007 - 21:27:40 EDT


Content-Type: text/plain

debian-user-digest Digest Volume 2007 : Issue 2053

Today's Topics:

  Re: lenny: getting non-free nvidia d  [ Alan Ianson  ]
  Re: lenny: getting non-free nvidia d  [ Alan Ianson  ]
  Re: lenny: getting non-free nvidia d  [ Sam Leon  ]
  Re: dumb question about aAdobe Acrob  [ John Hasler  ]
  Re: A question of fonts               [ andy  ]
  Re: lenny: getting non-free nvidia d  [ Vincent Lefevre  ]
  Re: A question of fonts               [ Douglas Allan Tutty  ]
  Re: lenny: getting non-free nvidia d  [ Alan Ianson  ]
  Re: lenny: getting non-free nvidia d  [ Alan Ianson  ]
  Re: dumb question about aAdobe Acrob  [ "s. keeling"  ]
  Re: dumb question about aAdobe Acrob  [ "s. keeling"  ]
  Re: dumb question about aAdobe Acrob  [ "s. keeling"  ]
  Re: Where is Lame in Sarge?           [ 2g  ]
  Re: Where is Lame in Sarge?           [ Alan Ianson  ]
  Re: dumb question about aAdobe Acrob  [ "Andrew J. Barr" 

Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 15:05:16 -0700
From: Alan Ianson <agianson@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: lenny: getting non-free nvidia drivers issue Message-Id: <200707281505.16677.agianson@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sat July 28 2007 14:38, David Fox wrote:
> I'm browsing howto's at the moment and attempting to get the nvidia drivers
> (the non-free ones) the "debian" way.
>
> There doesn't seem to be an avalable version of nvidia-kernel-source for my
> particular kernel (I was running 2.6.18-4-k7, but I just upgraded to
> 2.6.21-2-k7
> a few moments ago. I'm using
> http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/Debian-nVidia/, and
> http://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers as reference documents.
>
> There is also no nvidia-glx in testing. There has been some discussion on
> the list recently regarding some updates to X.org video drivers, which have
> unfortunately caused my existing nvidia setup to no longer work, so
> currently I am using the "nv" driver. From the instructions it would seem
> my current card (Geforce FX 5200) should be supported by the "non-legacy"
> or regular driver.
>
> According to the testing status page (
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=nvidia-glx) it would seem
> that testing is waiting for the newer driver package, which seems to be ATM
> availalbe in sid/unstable.
>
> Question - is it "safe" to retry the nvidia driver at this point? Last I
> tried, I ended up with a fairly unusable system and had to renstall most of
> X and go back to using the nv driver.
>
> If that is doable, I figure it would be better to do this the "debian way"
> and although I posted about this before, I probably would want to go ahead
> and add unstable sources to my sources.list and install that way.
>
> Or, I could wait until these are available in testing, but I don't have a
> clue low long that would take. (In a previous thread, it was opined that it
> would only take a few days or so.)
>
> Hints?

I don't know if this is "the debian way" but this is how I do it. I am running testing with kernel-2.6.22-2-amd64 at the moment but have also run the 2.6.21 kernel until recently along with the nvidia drivers without any issues at all. There are no pre-built kernel modules in testing or unstable, I build them with module-assistant.

module-assistant prepare or m-a prepare
module-assistant auto-install nvidia or m-a a-i nvidia

Do you need help?X

Also install nvidia-glx and nvidia-glx-ia32 if appropriate. Run "dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg" and choose the nvidia driver and set the rest of it up to your liking. If all goes well (and I'm sure it will) restart x and you should be good to go.. :)

Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 15:10:31 -0700
From: Alan Ianson <agianson@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: lenny: getting non-free nvidia drivers issue Message-Id: <200707281510.31430.agianson@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sat July 28 2007 14:38, David Fox wrote:
> I'm browsing howto's at the moment and attempting to get the nvidia drivers
> (the non-free ones) the "debian" way.
>
> There doesn't seem to be an avalable version of nvidia-kernel-source for my
> particular kernel (I was running 2.6.18-4-k7, but I just upgraded to
> 2.6.21-2-k7

I might suggest that you install the 2.6.22 kernel from unstable. I had problems building the kernel module for k7 because of a GPL-only export that isn't an issue with 2.6.22 kernels. You can use the 2.6.21 kernel but you will need to build your own with paravirt_ops disabled.

> a few moments ago. I'm using
> http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/Debian-nVidia/, and
> http://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers as reference documents.
>
> There is also no nvidia-glx in testing.

They are in testing, I'm using them now.. :)

Do you need more help?X

Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:23:45 -0500
From: Sam Leon <leon.mailinglist.36@gmail.com> To: Debian Users <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Subject: Re: lenny: getting non-free nvidia drivers issue Message-ID: <46ABC1F1.30702@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------020806070706010508040805"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--------------020806070706010508040805
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

David Fox wrote:
> I'm browsing howto's at the moment and attempting to get the nvidia
> drivers (the non-free ones) the "debian" way.
>
> There doesn't seem to be an avalable version of nvidia-kernel-source
> for my particular kernel (I was running 2.6.18-4-k7, but I just
> upgraded to 2.6.21-2-k7
> a few moments ago. I'm using
> http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/Debian-nVidia/
> <http://home.comcast.net/%7Eandrex/Debian-nVidia/>, and
> http://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers as reference documents.
>
> There is also no nvidia-glx in testing. There has been some discussion
> on the list recently regarding some updates to X.org <http://X.org>
> video drivers, which have unfortunately caused my existing nvidia
> setup to no longer work, so currently I am using the "nv" driver. From
> the instructions it would seem my current card (Geforce FX 5200)
> should be supported by the "non-legacy" or regular driver.
>
> According to the testing status page
> (http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=nvidia-glx) it would
> seem that testing is waiting for the newer driver package, which seems
> to be ATM availalbe in sid/unstable.
>
> Question - is it "safe" to retry the nvidia driver at this point? Last
> I tried, I ended up with a fairly unusable system and had to renstall
> most of X and go back to using the nv driver.
>
> If that is doable, I figure it would be better to do this the "debian
> way" and although I posted about this before, I probably would want to
> go ahead and add unstable sources to my sources.list and install that way.
>
> Or, I could wait until these are available in testing, but I don't
> have a clue low long that would take. (In a previous thread, it was
> opined that it would only take a few days or so.)
>
> Hints?
>
> thanks.
>
>
>
>

Yes, the current kernel will not let you compile the module for the nvidia drivers. There is a patched driver out that you can use that will work that gets around this problem: http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?p=88132#88132

This is what happens when you try to run the official nvidia driver script: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=432746

Sam

--------------020806070706010508040805
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Can we help you?X
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">





David Fox wrote:
<blockquote
 cite="mid359a3c580707281438u181eeacdi8e70704c88d2b25d@mail.gmail.com"  type="cite">I'm browsing howto's at the moment and attempting to get the nvidia drivers (the non-free ones) the "debian" way.<br>   <br>
There doesn't seem to be an avalable version of nvidia-kernel-source for my particular kernel (I was running 2.6.18-4-k7, but I just upgraded to 2.6.21-2-k7<br>
a few moments ago. I'm using <a
 href="http://home.comcast.net/%7Eandrex/Debian-nVidia/">http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/Debian-nVidia/</a>,&nbsp;and&nbsp;   <a href="http://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers">http://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers</a> as reference documents.<br>
  <br>
There is also no nvidia-glx in testing. There has been some discussion on the list recently regarding some updates to <a href="http://X.org"> X.org</a> video drivers, which have unfortunately caused my existing nvidia setup to no longer work, so currently I am using the "nv" driver. From the instructions it would seem my current card (Geforce FX 5200) should be supported by the "non-legacy" or regular driver.   <br>
  <br>
According to the testing status page (<a  href="http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=nvidia-glx">http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=nvidia-glx</a>) it would seem that testing is waiting for the newer driver package, which seems to be ATM availalbe in sid/unstable.   <br>
  <br>
Question - is it "safe" to retry the nvidia driver at this point? Last I tried, I ended up with a fairly unusable system and had to renstall most of X and go back to using the nv driver.<br>   <br>
If that is doable, I figure it would be better to do this the "debian way" and although I posted about this before, I probably would want to go ahead and add unstable sources to my sources.list and install that way.<br>
  <br>
Or, I could wait until these are available in testing, but I don't have a clue low long that would take. (In a previous thread, it was opined that it would only take a few days or so.)   <br>
  <br>
Hints?<br>
  <br>
thanks.<br>
  




</blockquote>
<br>
Yes, the current kernel will not let you compile the module for the nvidia drivers.&nbsp; There is a patched driver out that you can use that will work that gets around this problem: <a  href="http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?p=88132#88132">http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?p=88132#88132</a><br> <br>
This is what happens when you try to run the official nvidia driver script: <a
 href="http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=432746">http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=432746</a><br> <br>
Sam

--------------020806070706010508040805--

Can't find what you're looking for?X

Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 23:39:18 +0100
From: Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: dumb question about aAdobe Acrobat.... Message-ID: <20070728233918.4935c5d1@abydos.stargate.org.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_tK=6Uw/9/1Cj=I_bXkcE6X_";  protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1

--Sig_tK=6Uw/9/1Cj=I_bXkcE6X_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 15:57:11 -0500
John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org> wrote:

Hello John,

> Do you actually _need_ acroread? Xpdf isn't good enough?

IIRC, Xpdf doesn't have the ability to do form filling. With acroread, you can fill out forms (they have to be set up to allow it, of course), and then print them, already filled in. Obviously, you can't save the filled out form.

With my cruddy handwriting, I need all the help I can get. :-)

--=20
 Regards _

         / )           "The blindingly obvious is
        / _)rad        never immediately apparent"
Don't know where to look next?X

It couldn't adapt so it couldn't survive The Great British Mistake - The Adverts

--Sig_tK=6Uw/9/1Cj=I_bXkcE6X_
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGq8WZSXvR9Iq2E38RAhk0AJ4usdbIc+oZqy/gZxUxt92YY3X+hgCghcTj uqxBlVEMp9Oo16go2rK/nVc=
=xfm8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_tK=6Uw/9/1Cj=I_bXkcE6X_--

Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:15:54 -0500
From: John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: dumb question about aAdobe Acrobat.... Message-ID: <871wesjht1.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Michael writes:
> If you have access codes and passwords etc, then you can go on Companies
> House web site (http://www.companieshouse.gov.uk) and then you can submit
> the accounts on line. They give you a template file to download that is a
> pdf file.

Have you tried using any of the Free pdf packages?

Confused? Frustrated?X

> You then edit it and put in your accounting information. As far as I can
> see you are meant to do this with Adobe Acrobat...

Adobe Reader is not Adobe Acrobat. The latter is not free.

> In California it costs $900 to register a limited company.

Varies by state. Last time I filed it was $50 in Michigan.

-- 
John Hasler

Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 00:18:27 +0100 From: andy <geek_show@dsl.pipex.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: A question of fonts Message-ID: <46ABCEC3.3000409@dsl.pipex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Alan Ianson wrote:
> On Sat July 28 2007 14:28, andy wrote:
>
>> Alan Ianson wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat July 28 2007 12:30, Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 07/28/2007 12:20 PM, andy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Can I have a few recommendations please for the best fonts
>>>>> package to use for a desktop machine.
>>>>>
>>>> I have only installed one font package and have no experience
>>>> with any others.
>>>>
>>>> msttcorefonts
>>>>
>>>> It is available in the debian-multimedia repository.
>>>> http://www.debian-multimedia.org/
>>>>
>>> This package is in contrib. No need for debian-multimedia for this one.
>>>
>> I do have the latest msttcorefonts installed. It just looks crap with
>> Xmms and sometimes Iceweasel seems difficult to read too. But certainly
>> Xmms is the worst of the bunch.
>>
>
> Are you using utf-8 by chance? I haven't made the switch to utf-8 because a
> number of apps I use (mostly console) don't look right when I use it. This
> sounds similar but I don't know for sure.
>
I really don't know. How could I tell? A -- "If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about the answers." - Thomas Pynchon, "Gravity's Rainbow"

Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 01:35:41 +0200 From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.org> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: lenny: getting non-free nvidia drivers issue Message-ID: <20070728233541.GR6654@prunille.vinc17.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2007-07-28 15:10:31 -0700, Alan Ianson wrote:
> I might suggest that you install the 2.6.22 kernel from unstable. I
> had problems building the kernel module for k7 because of a GPL-only
> export that isn't an issue with 2.6.22 kernels.
But for another reason, it doesn't work with 2.6.22: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D434379 --=20 Vincent Lef=E8vre <vincent(at)vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 19:57:56 -0400 From: Rick Pasotto <rick@niof.net> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org, Kevin Mark <kevin.mark@verizon.net> Subject: Re: 'sensible-browser' Message-ID: <20070728235756.GE5477@niof.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 12:06:12PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
> Kevin Mark(kevin.mark@verizon.net) is reported to have said:
> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 11:57:45PM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> > > The browser I have running all the time is seamonkey. How can I get
> > > programs that want to use a browser open a seamonkey window instead of
> > > firing up the gnome or kde browser?
> > If you examine /usr/bin/sensible-browser, which is not very long, you
> > see 2 things that it looks for:
> > 1) the environment variable called BROWSER
> > 2) the Debian 'alternative' www-browser and x-www-browser
> > It check $BROWSER first and if that does not exist, it checks, if in X,
> > x-www-browser. This is set by a few means. One way is to make a manual
> > symlink. On my system:
> > $ ls -l /etc/alternatives/x-www-browser
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 2007-04-09 23:04 /etc/alternatives/x-www-browser -> /usr/bin/firefox
> > So, 'ln -s /etc/alternatives/x-www-browser /usr/bin/seamonkey' might do
> > it. I say might because, IIRC, gnome and kde sometimes overide this in
> > ways that i have not investiaged.(if someone out in -user land knows the
> > rest of the story, do tell).
>
> Or do it the debian way woth update-alternatives.
>
> u update-alternatives --config x-www-browser
How do I add seamonkey to the list of alternatives? -- "...to choose one's government is not necessarily to secure freedom." -- Friedrich Hayek (1899-1992) Rick Pasotto rick(at)niof.net http://www.niof.net

Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 18:40:07 -0400 From: Douglas Allan Tutty <dtutty@porchlight.ca> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: A question of fonts Message-ID: <20070728224007.GA12356@titan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 10:28:13PM +0100, andy wrote:
> Alan Ianson wrote:
> >On Sat July 28 2007 12:30, Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
> >>On 07/28/2007 12:20 PM, andy wrote:
> >>
> >>>Can I have a few recommendations please for the best fonts
> >>>package to use for a desktop machine.
> >>>
> >>I have only installed one font package and have no experience
> >>with any others.
> >>
What about just standard ttf-dejavu and gsfonts-x11? Doug.

Call Pantek today for Open Source Technical Support at 1-877-546-8934 - 24/7/365X

Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 18:45:10 -0400 From: Douglas Allan Tutty <dtutty@porchlight.ca> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: lenny: getting non-free nvidia drivers issue Message-ID: <20070728224510.GB12356@titan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 02:38:44PM -0700, David Fox wrote:
> I'm browsing howto's at the moment and attempting to get the nvidia drivers
> (the non-free ones) the "debian" way.

> According to the testing status page (
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=nvidia-glx) it would seem
> that testing is waiting for the newer driver package, which seems to be ATM
> availalbe in sid/unstable.
>

> Or, I could wait until these are available in testing, but I don't have a
> clue low long that would take. (In a previous thread, it was opined that it
> would only take a few days or so.)
IIRC, things go into testing if they haven't changed in Sid for 10 days. Difficulty with nvidia is the main reason that I'm sticking with Etch. Good luck, Doug.

Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:06:55 -0700 From: Alan Ianson <agianson@gmail.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: A question of fonts Message-Id: <200707281706.55439.agianson@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Sat July 28 2007 16:18, andy wrote:
> Alan Ianson wrote:
> > On Sat July 28 2007 14:28, andy wrote:
> >> Alan Ianson wrote:
> >>> On Sat July 28 2007 12:30, Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
> >>>> On 07/28/2007 12:20 PM, andy wrote:
> >>>>> Can I have a few recommendations please for the best fonts
> >>>>> package to use for a desktop machine.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have only installed one font package and have no experience
> >>>> with any others.
> >>>>
> >>>> msttcorefonts
> >>>>
> >>>> It is available in the debian-multimedia repository.
> >>>> http://www.debian-multimedia.org/
> >>>
> >>> This package is in contrib. No need for debian-multimedia for this one.
> >>
> >> I do have the latest msttcorefonts installed. It just looks crap with
> >> Xmms and sometimes Iceweasel seems difficult to read too. But certainly
> >> Xmms is the worst of the bunch.
> >
> > Are you using utf-8 by chance? I haven't made the switch to utf-8 because
> > a number of apps I use (mostly console) don't look right when I use it.
> > This sounds similar but I don't know for sure.
>
> I really don't know. How could I tell?
If you type env in a term what is lang= set to? You can adjust that setting by running "dpkg-reconfigure locales". I think etch uses utf-8 by default. A better solution would be if packages were utf-8 capable. It may be that xmms and iceweasel are not utf-8 aware but my knowledge if this stuff is sketcky at best.

Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:12:20 -0700 From: Alan Ianson <agianson@gmail.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: lenny: getting non-free nvidia drivers issue Message-Id: <200707281712.20240.agianson@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Sat July 28 2007 16:35, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2007-07-28 15:10:31 -0700, Alan Ianson wrote:
> > I might suggest that you install the 2.6.22 kernel from unstable. I
> > had problems building the kernel module for k7 because of a GPL-only
> > export that isn't an issue with 2.6.22 kernels.
>
> But for another reason, it doesn't work with 2.6.22:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=434379
That's a bummer. I've had that problem before having on older version of gcc and not a newer one. I managed to get it built by installing a newer gcc, not to sure how one would get past this one. Being on amd64 I have safely bypassed all of these issues somehow.

Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:23:26 -0700 From: Alan Ianson <agianson@gmail.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: lenny: getting non-free nvidia drivers issue Message-Id: <200707281723.26925.agianson@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Sat July 28 2007 15:45, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> Difficulty with nvidia is the main reason that I'm sticking with Etch.
Are you running an amd64 there? I have had no trouble on the amd64 with the nvidia drivers. There a couple issues that I know of for the i386 but amd64 has been painless.. :)

Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 00:33:30 GMT From: "s. keeling" <keeling@nucleus.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: dumb question about aAdobe Acrobat.... Message-ID: <slrnfano2f.4hp.keeling@heretic.nucleus.com> Michael Fothergill <mikef20000@hotmail.com>:
> >From: Tommi Asiala <tommi@asiala.info>
> >>Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > >> I suggest you should try this new thing called "Searching the web". It
> > >> can give you nice links to web pages such as:
> > >>
> > >> http://wiki.debian.org/PDFViewers
> >
> >Don't suspect, read the web page.
>
> OK, I see there IS a deb file and way to get at it....
>
> Sorry about that one. I am such a fatalist. When I went on the Adobe site
Better yet, learn to use the Debian tools: aptitude search pdf [LOTS of stuff] aptitude search pdf | egrep '^i' i xpdf - Portable Document Format (PDF) suite i A xpdf-common - Portable Document Format (PDF) suite -- co i A xpdf-reader - Portable Document Format (PDF) suite -- vi i A xpdf-utils - Portable Document Format (PDF) suite -- ut aptitude show xpdf [lots of juicy details] -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 - - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me.

Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 00:35:30 GMT From: "s. keeling" <keeling@nucleus.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: dumb question about aAdobe Acrobat.... Message-ID: <slrnfano6c.4hp.keeling@heretic.nucleus.com> Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>:
> On 07/28/07 13:46, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> >
> > I was wrong. As Jesus said in the Bible "O, ye of little faith". I
>
> Yeshua didn't speak English. But that's a way different topic.
You spelt $DEITY wrong. I spell it "Murphy". -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 - - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me.

Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 00:39:37 GMT From: "s. keeling" <keeling@nucleus.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: dumb question about aAdobe Acrobat.... Message-ID: <slrnfanoe4.4hp.keeling@heretic.nucleus.com> Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk>:
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 15:57:11 -0500
> John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org> wrote:
>
> > Do you actually _need_ acroread? Xpdf isn't good enough?
>
> IIRC, Xpdf doesn't have the ability to do form filling. With acroread,
> you can fill out forms (they have to be set up to allow it, of course),
> and then print them, already filled in. Obviously, you can't save the
> filled out form.
OO.o --> Save As ... $(vi ...) ... -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 - - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me.

Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:29:48 +0900 From: 2g <electriclightheads@gmail.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Where is Lame in Sarge? Message-ID: <1078018b0707281729m6fbe0ec6l2397513ca6403fd2@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline at their site only deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org sid main is recommended for unstable even though they have deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org stable main and deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org testing main maybe i should just try but afraid of something get broken someone doing well with deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org unstable main ? tia

Do you need help?X

Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:32:08 -0700 From: Alan Ianson <agianson@gmail.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Where is Lame in Sarge? Message-Id: <200707281732.08286.agianson@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Sat July 28 2007 17:29, 2g wrote:
> at their site
> only
> deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org sid main
> is recommended for unstable
> even though they have
> deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org stable main
> and
> deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org testing main
> maybe i should just try but
> afraid of something get broken
>
> someone doing well with
> deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org unstable main
My laptop is running unstable with quite a few packages from d-m. I haven't had any problems. If you are running sid I would use the unstable branch of d-m.

Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 21:08:05 -0400 From: "Andrew J. Barr" <andrew.james.barr@gmail.com> To: "s. keeling" <keeling@nucleus.com> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: dumb question about aAdobe Acrobat.... Message-ID: <903e17bb0707281808w6da4709fo80b74184212e6ee@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 7/28/07, s. keeling <keeling@nucleus.com> wrote:
> Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>:
> > On 07/28/07 13:46, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > >
> > > I was wrong. As Jesus said in the Bible "O, ye of little faith". I
> >
> > Yeshua didn't speak English. But that's a way different topic.
>
> You spelt $DEITY wrong. I spell it "Murphy".
*starts popcorn in the microwave* -- Andrew Barr We matter more than pounds and pence, your economic theory makes no sense... End of debian-user-digest Digest V2007 Issue #2053 ************************************************** Received on Sat Jul 28 21:25:15 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 09 2007 - 19:05:33 EDT


Contact Us  Legal Notices  Order Services Online 
Pantek Home  Privacy Policy  IT news  Site Map  Pantek Library