Pantek Library
Hosting Provided By
CybrHost
High Speed Hosting

debian-user-digest Digest V2007 #2072

From: <debian-user-digest-request(at)lists.debian.org>
Date: Tue Jul 31 2007 - 12:48:18 EDT


Content-Type: text/plain

debian-user-digest Digest Volume 2007 : Issue 2072

Today's Topics:

  how to save a caneva                  [ "abdelkader belahcene" 
  Re: Firefox \ Iceweasel Differences?  [ Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwe ]
  Re: Firefox \ Iceweasel Differences?  [ Anson Gardner <ansongardner@poncaci ]

Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:53:20 +0100
From: "abdelkader belahcene" <abelahcene@gmail.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: how to save a caneva

Message-ID: <46688cb90707310453p6b2c8a20r6e58006bbaafd6aa@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,
 I use fltk (C++ graphical interface) to create an electronics design package. I created a list of objects and placed them on a window.

My problem is how to save the file, I think to create a list in memory for the objects placed on the sheet and store them in a file.

 I think (not sure of course) that xfig for example uses this procedure ?

Do you need help?X

Please whould you like give me how to do it or where can I find it a simple example or doc.

 thank you
 bela

Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 04:54:43 -0700
From: Bert Schulze <potassium.xyanide@googlemail.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Setfont
Message-ID: <1185882883.489070.236820@l70g2000hse.googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

On 30 Jul., 19:50, "Loeghmon T. Nejad" <loegh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a minimal installation of Debian Etch (with xserver-xorg-core
> installed) that gives me an error message when I run the script -at the
> bottom of this email.
> The message says,
> "
> setfont: command not found
> mapscrn: command not found
> "

Hi,

as the script tells you, it cant locate those two binaries. Now the question is: is your PATH environment set correctly to find binaries in /bin /usr/bin etc? Or did you just miss to have the needed packages which contain them?

apt-file search setfont|grep bin
kbd: usr/bin/setfont
kbd-compat: usr/bin/setfont

Do you need more help?X

$ apt-file search mapscrn|grep bin
kbd: usr/bin/mapscrn
kbd-compat: usr/bin/mapscrn

so install kbd and try again (;

Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:38:56 +0100
From: "Karl E. Jorgensen" <karl@jorgensen.org.uk> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: dpkg purge problem
Message-ID: <20070731123856.GA19663@einstein.jorgensen.org.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;

        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh" Content-Disposition: inline

--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 01:15:19AM +0300, Sasho Angelov wrote:
> When I try to purge old linux image:
>=20
> sudo dpkg --purge --force-all linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7

Why --force-all ?

Can we help you?X

> (Reading database ... 259033 files and directories currently installed.)
> Removing linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 ...
> Purging configuration files for linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 ...
> Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub
> Searching for default file ... found: /boot/grub/default
> Testing for an existing GRUB menu.lst file ... found: /boot/grub/menu.lst
> Searching for splash image ... none found, skipping ...
> Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.22-1-k7
> Updating /boot/grub/menu.lst ... done
>=20
> And stop here. Only I can do is to press Ctrl+C
> then result is:
> dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 (--purge):
> subprocess post-removal script killed by signal (Interrupt)
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7
>=20
>=20
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux- image-2.6.14-2-k7.list is empty file
>=20
> What to do???

Which debconf frontend do you use? I've had that happen to me when I=20 "accidentally" used the GNOME front-end. Not a problem, unless you're on=20 a virtual console and DISPLAY is set - then it shows the GUI on the X=20 display that I'm not looking at.... Took me a while to figure out...

--=20
Karl E. Jorgensen
karl(at)jorgensen.org.uk http://www.jorgensen.org.uk/ karl(at)jorgensen.com http://karl.jorgensen.com =3D=3D=3D=3D Today's fortune:
old inkjet cartridges emanate barium-based fumes

--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGry1gi+PVvwZpXJgRAhIOAKCXyihIgGaY44twyWELiJBuEjSU3QCgo699 o1hLoOI9oZ9oRB3W9HUXE18=
=P4wL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh--

Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:49:10 +0530
From: "Alpesh Rodage" <alpeshrodage@gmail.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: NPTL issues w/ stable
Message-ID: <6a0f3d7e0707310519i1489ff58i5071ca221fdfcdaf@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

Can't find what you're looking for?X

        boundary="----=_Part_44145_18306361.1185884350735"

------=_Part_44145_18306361.1185884350735

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Try resetting environment variable GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION export GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION=""

Then check for thread version again.
getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION

e.g.
getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION
NPTL 0.61 If this tells you the version of threads is NTPL then this will solve your problem.

------=_Part_44145_18306361.1185884350735

Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Try resetting environment variable GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION
export GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION=""
Don't know where to look next?X
</span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"></font><pre style="margin: 0em; font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><font size="2"><br>Then check for thread version again.<br>getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION<br><br>e.g.<br>getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION <br>NPTL 0.61<br><br>If this tells you the version of threads is NTPL then this will solve your problem.<br><br></font></pre>

------=_Part_44145_18306361.1185884350735--

Confused? Frustrated?X

Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 08:33:43 -0500
From: Matt Zagrabelny <mzagrabe@d.umn.edu> To: Ashivni Shekhawat <shekhawat.ashivni@gmail.com> Cc: debian-user-digest@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Not able to find qwtplot3D
Message-Id: <1185888823.15216.2.camel@grateful.d.umn.edu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-THrK2nyztlT6VtIlp5yb"

--=-THrK2nyztlT6VtIlp5yb
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 19:46 -0500, Ashivni Shekhawat wrote:=20
> Hi!
> I am new to Debian. I have trying to install qwtplot3d on my
> machine; however I get the following error:
>=20
> # apt-get install qwtplot3d
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> E: Couldn't find package qwtplot3d
>=20
> The package qwtplot3d is available on ftp.debian.org at
> http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/q/qwtplot3d/

if you look at the .deb files in that directory you will see that there is no *binary* package by the name "qwtplot3d". qwtplot3d is the *source* package for a bunch of binary packages (their corresponding files all begin with libqwtplot3d and end in .deb).

also if you look you will see that there are only amd64 and i386 binary packages. if you are running a different architecture than those, you will have to wait for the debian build system to create the packages or compile them yourself.

--=20
Matt Zagrabelny - mzagrabe@d.umn.edu - (218) 726 8844 University of Minnesota Duluth
Information Technology Systems & Services PGP key 1024D/84E22DA2 2005-11-07
Fingerprint: 78F9 18B3 EF58 56F5 FC85 C5CA 53E7 887F 84E2 2DA2

He is not a fool who gives up what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose.
-Jim Elliot

--=-THrK2nyztlT6VtIlp5yb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Call Pantek today for Open Source Technical Support at 1-877-546-8934 - 24/7/365X

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBGrzo3U+eIf4TiLaIRAvX+AJwNqPGo7UtPzBx2pjUcMtfS3bZAEgCg8MfK fLyVAYfzUJ0UgdyPvnV6SB0=
=s7uu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-THrK2nyztlT6VtIlp5yb--

Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:09:50 -0400
From: "Luis Finotti" <finotti.deb@gmail.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Disabling Print Screen key

Message-ID: 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,

My Print Screen key is too close to BackSpace, so I keep pressing it by accident. I use KDE, and this makes "KSnapshoyt" pop up. (In fluxbox, it sends the content of the terminal to the printer.)

I checked the key assignments of KDE, and I found no shortcut for the PrtSc key, and even defining a different application for that key would still make (only) KSnapshot pop up. (KSnapshot was assigned to Crtl+PrtSc, and I disabled it too, just in case.)

My Google searchs did not help (even on this list).

Do you need help?X

So, I decided to disable the key.

Using "xev", I saw that the keycode was 111:

....
KeyRelease event, serial 31, synthetic NO, window 0x3600001,

    root 0x91, subw 0x0, time 482199882, (485,527), root:(489,552),     state 0x0, keycode 111 (keysym 0xff61, Print), same_screen YES,     XLookupString gives 0 bytes:
....

Indeed, "xmodmap -pk" gave:

...

    111 0xff61 (Print) 0xff15 (Sys_Req) ...

So, I did "xmodmap -e "keysym Print = BackSpace"". Now, "xev" gives:

Do you need more help?X

....
KeyRelease event, serial 31, synthetic NO, window 0x3400001,

    root 0x91, subw 0x0, time 482660638, (-260,401), root:(838,426),     state 0x0, keycode 111 (keysym 0xff08, BackSpace), same_screen YES,     XKeysymToKeycode returns keycode: 22     XLookupString gives 1 bytes: (08) "
....

and "xmodmap -pk" gives:

...

    111 0xff08 (BackSpace)
...

But still, KSnapshot pops up, and the backspace has no effect.

Any suggestions or ideas (other than remove the key physically)??

Thanks,

Can we help you?X

Luis

Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:53:01 +0530
From: arijit sarkar <arijit.2612@gmail.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Firefox \ Iceweasel Differences?

Message-ID: <46AF53D5.1090205@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Jul 30, 8:30 pm, arijit sarkar <arijit.2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> As far as I know, Iceweasel is Firefox without the "Talkback" component,
>> which is not open and matches debian-philosophy.
>>
>
> The name and logo are also nonfree in Firefox.
>
>

thanks for the correction. :)

Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:46:30 +0300
From: andreimpopescu@gmail.com (Andrei Popescu) To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Firefox \ Iceweasel Differences? Message-ID: <20070731154630.GC9439@think> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;

        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sHrvAb52M6C8blB9" Content-Disposition: inline

--sHrvAb52M6C8blB9

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Can't find what you're looking for?X

On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 04:39:47PM +0930, Stef Daniels VK5HSX wrote: =20
> > Then web sites won't be able to tell the difference, and FWIW you
> > should report the web site to it's owners as broken. User-agent
> > detection is broken behavior.
>=20
> I feel it's the website not knowing the browser, hense, unable to render
> the page properly. Thanks.

IIUC websites shouldn't care about/need to know what browser is used, as=20 long as they are following the standards.

Regards,
Andrei
--=20
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)

--sHrvAb52M6C8blB9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGr1lWqJyztHCFm9kRApq9AJ9bf46LmRYAkttMmg25z3Cl7j8PwQCfaKsK 8b8kRe3LS0Oay7mcpj5osgc=
=lxo/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sHrvAb52M6C8blB9--

Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:04:42 +0300
From: andreimpopescu@gmail.com (Andrei Popescu) To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Part3: More problems.
Message-ID: <20070731160442.GD9439@think> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;

Don't know where to look next?X

        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN" Content-Disposition: inline

--rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 02:03:54AM -0500, Brad B wrote:
> Thanks for helping me. I installed both of those, and it got past request=
ing
> libc!
> Now, it's requesting the kernel source, which i can't seem to find the
> appropriate version of.

'uname -a' will tell you the running kernel. I have:

$ uname -a
Linux think 2.6.22-1-686 #1 SMP Mon Jul 23 13:23:02 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux

So the kernel source is probably linux-source-2.6.22

BTW, please use the reply feature of your mail client if it's about the=20 same problem, start new messages for different problems.

Regards,
Andrei
--=20
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)

Confused? Frustrated?X

--rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGr12aqJyztHCFm9kRAsGMAJ971ujNcyb+O5wpvp5e/6fxPA8A/QCgo/uY tdg6GeGVZCLpzdwoKdjWpaE=
=ZWNh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN--

Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:09:54 -0400
From: Jose Luis Rivas Contreras <ghostbar38@gmail.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Part3: More problems.
Message-ID: <46AF5ED2.2010301@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enigC0766C55300603839443C726"

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)

--------------enigC0766C55300603839443C726
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 02:03:54AM -0500, Brad B wrote:
>> Thanks for helping me. I installed both of those, and it got past requ=
esting
>> libc!
>> Now, it's requesting the kernel source, which i can't seem to find the=

>> appropriate version of.
>=20
> 'uname -a' will tell you the running kernel. I have:
>=20
> $ uname -a
> Linux think 2.6.22-1-686 #1 SMP Mon Jul 23 13:23:02 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/L=
inux
>=20
> So the kernel source is probably linux-source-2.6.22

Call Pantek today for Open Source Technical Support at 1-877-546-8934 - 24/7/365X

Maybe installing `linux-headers-2.6.22' could be enough since this package install the source in `/usr/src/'... Please try this option first instead of installing linux-source.

Regards,
Jose Luis.
--=20

ghostbar on Linux/Debian 'sid' x86_64-SMP - #382503 Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://linuxtachira.org http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es San Crist=C3=B3bal, Venezuela. http://chaslug.org.ve Fingerprint =3D 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118

--------------enigC0766C55300603839443C726
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGr17TOKCtW8rKsRgRAlioAJ9qn7hMKVghovyJleKUZWsDCb6+OwCfTAOs vK/fn7AjLYyKWXvFQWvCk/0=
=ICQN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC0766C55300603839443C726--

Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:09:06 -0700
From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian Etch apache2 virtual host problem Message-ID: <20070731160906.GG31753@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;

        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cKDw3XFoqocuprIa" Content-Disposition: inline

Do you need help?X

--cKDw3XFoqocuprIa

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 09:30:38AM -0000, rocky wrote:
> Hey,
>=20
> I'm runing Debian etch with apache2 on it. To make the server host
> many website I added the following code to the end of /etc/apache2/
> apache2.conf
> ----------------------Code
> begin--------------------------------------------------------------
> NameVirtualHost *
> <VirtualHost *>
> # Basic setup
> ServerAdmin webmaster@workzone.com
> ServerName www.workzone.com
> DocumentRoot /var/www/workzone/htdocs
>=20
>=20
> # HTML documents, with indexing.
> <Directory />
> Options +Includes
> </Directory>
>=20
> # CGI Handling
> ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ /var/www/workzone/cgi-bin/
> <Location /cgi-bin>
> Options +ExecCGI
> </Location>
>=20
> # Logfiles
> ErrorLog /var/www/workzone/logs/error.log
> CustomLog /var/www/workzone/logs/access.log combined
> </VirtualHost>
> ---------------------------------Code
> End----------------------------------------
> The command apache2ctl configtest tells me "[Fri Jan 01 11:55:20 1999]
> [warn] NameVirtualHost *:0 has no VirtualHosts
> Syntax OK"

you have not specified any virtual hosts. something like:

<VirtualHost 192.168.2.3:80>

        ServerName blah.foo.com
        DocumentRoot /var/www/root/of/blah
        CustomLog /var/log/apache2/access.log combined
</VirtualHost>

would be in order with a different block with unique ServerName for each virtual host you want.=20

see http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/vhosts/name-based.html

might be helpful

A

Do you need more help?X

--cKDw3XFoqocuprIa

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGr16iaIeIEqwil4YRAnuaAKC6+aHh1XFbsR/VdlHeaHIuPXyXyACcCiI9 dq1Q5urTl+vTPySlusVjzyU=
=Qx0w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cKDw3XFoqocuprIa--

Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:18:00 -0700
From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: etch installation probs (CD?) Message-ID: <20070731161800.GH31753@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;

        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1RkCiX/UEfbG28Bk" Content-Disposition: inline

--1RkCiX/UEfbG28Bk

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 09:27:33AM +0100, michael wrote:

> On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 07:41 -0700, Alan Ianson wrote:
> > On Mon July 30 2007 07:10, michael wrote:
> > > Folks, I've a new machine with a "writemaster" CDROM drive. When tryi=
ng
> > > to install Debian 4.0 from iso image burnt to CD, it initially
> > > recognises the CD and starts the installation but fails at the screen
> > > where the CD drive is to be recognised (for continuing the
> > > installation). I've tried various module/device combos but all to no
> > > avail. I've looked about on Google but not come up with a working
> > > solution.
> > >
> > > Has anybody else successfully uses this CDROM drive to install Debian,
> > > or have suggestions on how I can determine a working module/device
> > > combo. Please let me know if you need any further information.
> >=20
> > I've installed etch amd64 and i386 successfully many times. I'm not sur=
e what=20
> > the problem is but you might be able to use the daily install from test=
ing to=20
> > get going. You can get the it from here..
> >=20
> > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/i=
so-cd/
> >=20
> > If you get the businesscard iso and boot it in expert mode it will prom=
pt you=20
> > if you want to install stable, testing or unstable. I would try to inst=
all=20
> > stable and if your successful run "apt-cdrom add" for your cd or dvd im=
ages=20
> > after you boot and install whatever else you want.
> >=20
> > That image contains nothing but the installer, you need to have an acti=
ve=20
> > network connection to install with it.
>=20
> I've just tried the 'debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso' (build 30 July
> 2007) but it also fails on recognising the CD and network...

I've seen this before on this list. There are some motherboards now that have changed the way CD's work. Essentially, they are available as boot devices, but once the boot starts, the CD drive is no longer available. Something to do with it not being a true IDE interface, but emulated IDE over SATA or something and then the bios hides it or some other goblety-gook like that. I don't think changing the CD drive is going to help one bit.=20

Can we help you?X

A few things you could try: booting from USB with some kind of bootable media with the installer on it there; dragging the harddrive to a different machine and donig the base install there and then completing it on the new machine (warning, this may require more than just an install -- you may need to build special initrd's to include _ALL_ modules to boot on the new machine); scrounge a floppy drive and use the netinstall floppies to get yourself going; setting up the installer on a network and netbooting into it.=20

Can you get a live-cd to boot? I'd be surprised as I assume they suffer from the same problem, but if you could get one to go, then use debootstrap to install.

There may be other solutions, but that's what I've got.

good luck

A

--1RkCiX/UEfbG28Bk

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGr2C4aIeIEqwil4YRAugaAJwOk6Ht2qj4Gaeh3JnUjFqODKLQRQCeLxEf jWpQA9lsSF3+Eyok8TXp9Fs=
=rJY5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1RkCiX/UEfbG28Bk--

Can't find what you're looking for?X

Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:21:28 -0700
From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian 4.0 on AMD64 and SATA with multi-arch DVD Message-ID: <20070731162128.GI31753@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;

        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GN/IAAAoV4GJoJGS" Content-Disposition: inline

--GN/IAAAoV4GJoJGS

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Don't know where to look next?X
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 01:07:32PM +0530, Masatran, R. Deepak wrote:
> * Masatran, R. Deepak <masatran@research.iiit.ac.in> 2007-07-23
> > I just installed Debian 4.0, on an AMD64 computer that has a SATA hard
> > drive, from the multi-architecture DVD. I used "expert" at the first pr=
ompt,
> > since "amd64-expert" was giving errors. I chose the 2.6-amd64 kernel du=
ring
> > installation.
> >=20
> > Installation completed successfully, but when it is booted, the console
> > locks up, the kernel panics, and it stops responding. I tried some fidd=
ling
> > with the parameters in the "kernel" line in GRUB, but it did not help.
> > Kindly suggest a solution.
>=20
> I reinstalled Debian using "amd64-expertgui" at the first prompt, using t=
he
> same DVD. The reinstall completed successfully, but it is unable to boot.
> When I add to the "kernel" line in GRUB, I get:
>=20
> ADDITION: RESULT
>=20
> 1. nothing: Kernel panic
> 2. noapic nolapic: Kernel panic
> 3. acpi=3Doff: SATA internal errors
> 4. acpi=3Doff noapic nolapic: SATA internal errors
>=20
> "Kernel panic" looks like this:
>=20
> Code: <pairs of hexadecimal digits>
> Console shuts up ...
> <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Aiee, killing interrupt handler
>=20
> I could not find any hardware problem. The hard drive is a Seagate 7200.10
> 300 giga-byte SATA. The whole computer is new.
>=20
> Searching the web showed that similar problems were tackled by
> adding/removing kernel modules. Can this be solved by adding/removing ker=
nel
> modules?

if that is the case then you're probably dealing with a situation where the proper modules are not being used in the initrd to get the root filesystem up. you could boot a live-cd and chroot into the system to rebuild the initrd's making sure to include all the modules, or at least ensuring that you include the right modules...

>=20
> ALSO: I want to try the 486 linux-image, but dpkg refuses to install it,
> saying that that package is only for I386. How can I install the 486
> linux-image on my AMD64 computer?

I'm confused. do you have more than one AMD64 computer? or does your kernel panic above only happen sometimes?

Confused? Frustrated?X

A

--GN/IAAAoV4GJoJGS

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGr2GIaIeIEqwil4YRAi3eAJwJV5MPEosZ1sWAeasopKsBtGBP4wCcC6eV eVsof51xBqlX6pagMwTZdUw=
=emG0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GN/IAAAoV4GJoJGS--

Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:25:40 -0700
From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Firefox \ Iceweasel Differences? Message-ID: <20070731162540.GJ31753@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;

        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2gg7fA5kVn3CgPY0" Content-Disposition: inline

--2gg7fA5kVn3CgPY0

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Call Pantek today for Open Source Technical Support at 1-877-546-8934 - 24/7/365X

On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 10:55:45AM -0500, Anson Gardner wrote:
>=20
> > >
> > > Change the preference general.useragent.extra.firefox from
> > > "Iceweasel/2.0.0.5" (or whatever your version is to "Firefox/2.0.0.5".
> >
> > Worked like a treat, thanks!!
> >
> > > Then web sites won't be able to tell the difference, and FWIW you
> > > should report the web site to it's owners as broken. User-agent
> > > detection is broken behavior.
> >
> > I feel it's the website not knowing the browser, hense, unable to render
> > the page properly. Thanks.
> >
>=20
> Not to get all gripey or anything, but there are web standards for precis=
ely=20
> this reason. See http://www.w3.org

Having just put together my first real webpage (still pretty basic) let me tell you (I'm sure you know) its a royal PITA. I've had to make an extra stylesheet just for stupid IE and then put a check for IE in the headers. Thankfully it was pretty simple and I end up with a page that renders "okay" in IE and looks great in everything else. I told my "customer" (heh, step-mother) that if it got any more complicated that I wasn't going to support IE and we'd just put up a redirect to mozilla. She doesn't understand but, what can you do. I'm not going to go down that road.

A

--2gg7fA5kVn3CgPY0

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGr2KEaIeIEqwil4YRAk6SAKChc9JIOdnTD9Cy1TGL+N169i/XhACg2VWz 8azKCKoDtz6Y0NNlbWjZbJk=
=tQjB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2gg7fA5kVn3CgPY0--

Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:55:45 -0500
From: Anson Gardner <ansongardner@poncacity.net> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Firefox \ Iceweasel Differences? Message-Id: <200707311055.45140.ansongardner@poncacity.net> Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Do you need help?X

> >
> > Change the preference general.useragent.extra.firefox from
> > "Iceweasel/2.0.0.5" (or whatever your version is to "Firefox/2.0.0.5".
>
> Worked like a treat, thanks!!
>
> > Then web sites won't be able to tell the difference, and FWIW you
> > should report the web site to it's owners as broken. User-agent
> > detection is broken behavior.
>
> I feel it's the website not knowing the browser, hense, unable to render
> the page properly. Thanks.
>

Not to get all gripey or anything, but there are web standards for precisely this reason. See http://www.w3.org

Regards,

Anson Gardner

End of debian-user-digest Digest V2007 Issue #2072


Received on Tue Jul 31 12:45:31 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 09 2007 - 19:05:36 EDT


Contact Us  Legal Notices  Order Services Online 
Pantek Home  Privacy Policy  IT news  Site Map  Pantek Library