Pantek Library
Hosting Provided By
CybrHost
High Speed Hosting
Mailing Lists: lists.debian.org > debian-user-digest > 07 > 080273.html (Request Expert lists.debian.org Support)

debian-user-digest Digest V2007 #2100

From: <debian-user-digest-request(at)lists.debian.org>
Date: Sun Aug 05 2007 - 10:52:05 EDT


Content-Type: text/plain

debian-user-digest Digest Volume 2007 : Issue 2100

Today's Topics: 

  Re: Kmail - satellite server error..  [ Andrei Popescu  ]
  How to specify primary display with   [ David Purton  ]
  Re: Kmail - satellite server error..  [ Charlie  ]
  ipw2100 + Debian etch + Firmware tro  [ Stefan Bauer  ]
  Re: Bridged Network Question          [ Sheridan Hutchinson  ]

Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 10:17:39 +0300
From: Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Kmail - satellite server error... Message-ID: <20070805071739.GD6456@think.homenet> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;

        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GpGaEY17fSl8rd50" Content-Disposition: inline

--GpGaEY17fSl8rd50 

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 05:12:02PM +1000, Charlie wrote:
> Posted this to Debian-KDE list without reply. Hope to get some ideas here.
> Posting through IceDove.

Do you need help?X

Does this mean IceDove works?

> Sending failed:
> Message sending failed since the following recipients were rejected by
> the server:
> xxxxxxx@clearmail.com.au (The server responded: "relaying mail to
> clearmail.com.au is not allowed")
> The message will stay in the 'outbox' folder until you either fix the
> problem (e.g. a broken address) or remove the message from the 'outbox'
> folder.

Maybe you need additional settings (AUTH, SSL, ...) for the new=20 provider, but only they can tell you this.

Regards,
Andrei
--=20
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)

--GpGaEY17fSl8rd50 

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGtXmTqJyztHCFm9kRAthtAKCRsa4CZqelwC23Isqxw5GFX6KDEQCcDs4u ICck9S2T40+Tm+R0CAE1RIo=
=RoRT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GpGaEY17fSl8rd50--

Do you need more help?X

Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 17:12:02 +1000
From: Charlie <ariestao@clearmail.com.au> 

To: Debian-User-list 
Subject: Kmail - satellite server error...
Message-ID: <46B57842.5000608@clearmail.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Posted this to Debian-KDE list without reply. Hope to get some ideas here. Posting through IceDove.

Using Debian Etch/Lenny
Have just been connected to satellite internet provider Clearnetworks who have some Linux capable techs on their staff, but have not been able to resolve a problem with Kmail 1.9.5 [using KDE 3.5.7] in Debian testing.

If I attempt to send an email to myself, or replying to the test of the satellite provider [smtp], or anyone else. Using Kmail 1.9.5 [using KDE 3.5.7], with the new email address after setting the accounts up, I get an error message:-

Sending failed:
Message sending failed since the following recipients were rejected by the server:
xxxxxxx@clearmail.com.au (The server responded: "relaying mail to clearmail.com.au is not allowed")
The message will stay in the 'outbox' folder until you either fix the problem (e.g. a broken address) or remove the message from the 'outbox' folder.

I have no problem sending through the old dialup provider and have used Kmail for years. This is a new twist.

Am wondering if someone might point me in the direction of a fix?

Thanks in advance,
Charlie

Can we help you?X

Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:17:17 +0930
From: David Purton <dcpurton@marshwiggle.net> To: Debian User List <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Subject: How to specify primary display with intel and xrandr 

Message-ID: <20070805074717.GA18904@marshwiggle.net>
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd"

Can't find what you're looking for?X

--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd 

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

I have been playing with xrandr to get multi monitor support working on my intel i915 mobile card. I running unstable.

It works ok, except the primary monitor gets set to the external vga screen!

How can I get the primary display to be the laptop panel and the secondary display to be the external vga screen?

The current default behaviour seems really stupid and I can't believe that there isn't a way to do it, though google has only turned up people with the same problem and no one with a solution.

Don't know where to look next?X

cheers

dc

--=20
David Purton
dcpurton@marshwiggle.net
=20
For the eyes of the LORD range throughout the earth to strengthen those whose hearts are fully committed to him. 

                                 2 Chronicles 16:9a

--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd 

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGtYCFFtfqMu4ICewRAu6MAKCGXMF0XFF7coxn8rKzzzFuCcUFAgCeMqlh 5QAkOJ0DEIXIMNKXwLmrrNA=
=V6Kd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd--

Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 11:12:24 +0300
From: Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: How to specify primary display with intel and xrandr Message-ID: <20070805081224.GE6456@think.homenet> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;

Confused? Frustrated?X

        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VUDLurXRWRKrGuMn" Content-Disposition: inline

--VUDLurXRWRKrGuMn 

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 05:17:17PM +0930, David Purton wrote:
> Hi all,

>=20

> I have been playing with xrandr to get multi monitor support working on
> my intel i915 mobile card. I running unstable.
>=20

> It works ok, except the primary monitor gets set to the external vga
> screen!
>=20

> How can I get the primary display to be the laptop panel and the
> secondary display to be the external vga screen?

Do you mean this?

# This is for getting the video on the LCD xvattr -a XV_PIPE -v 1

I have this in my .icewm/startup. If you don't use IceWM you have to put=20 it somewhere else where it's executed after start of X.

> The current default behaviour seems really stupid and I can't believe
> that there isn't a way to do it, though google has only turned up people
> with the same problem and no one with a solution.

The default behaviour is not so stupid if you consider many people would=20 need this for an external projector, TV-out, whatever.

Call Pantek today for Open Source Technical Support at 1-877-546-8934 - 24/7/365X

Regards,
Andrei
--=20
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)

--VUDLurXRWRKrGuMn 

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGtYZoqJyztHCFm9kRAugNAJoCT5tW98c3HATxNIiH4QjLbzCQkACePrGs XbuSvhVhwTauIfWdyIoupsA=
=k9s6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VUDLurXRWRKrGuMn--

Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 11:15:14 +0300
From: Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Kmail - satellite server error... Message-ID: <20070805081514.GF6456@think.homenet> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;

        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5Mfx4RzfBqgnTE/w" Content-Disposition: inline

--5Mfx4RzfBqgnTE/w 

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Do you need help?X

On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 06:12:56PM +1000, Charlie wrote:  =20 

>>> Posting through IceDove.
>>
>> Does this mean IceDove works?
>>
>>> Sending failed:
>>> Message sending failed since the following recipients were rejected by
>>> the server:
>>> xxxxxxx@clearmail.com.au (The server responded: "relaying mail to
	^^^^^^^

Too late, your e-mail address is already in clear in the archives

> Icedove does work, and there is nothing extra required for the=20
> provider, we went through that.

The next place I'd look would be the kmail bugreports=20 (htts://bugs.debian.org/kmail).

Regards,
Andrei
--=20
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)

--5Mfx4RzfBqgnTE/w 

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGtYcRqJyztHCFm9kRAkiDAKCzx65FJaqdtfwB0aXMr7/suEGvbwCeL08T XVcAHw5fKy/qzdr1N4FNQZQ=
=Qohi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5Mfx4RzfBqgnTE/w--

Do you need more help?X

Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 18:12:56 +1000
From: Charlie <ariestao@clearmail.com.au> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Kmail - satellite server error... 

Message-ID: <46B58688.6050108@clearmail.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 05:12:02PM +1000, Charlie wrote:
> 

>> Posted this to Debian-KDE list without reply. Hope to get some ideas here.
>> Posting through IceDove.
>>     
>

> Does this mean IceDove works?
>

> 
>> Sending failed:
>> Message sending failed since the following recipients were rejected by
>> the server:
>> xxxxxxx@clearmail.com.au (The server responded: "relaying mail to
>> clearmail.com.au is not allowed")
>> The message will stay in the 'outbox' folder until you either fix the
>> problem (e.g. a broken address) or remove the message from the 'outbox'
>> folder.
>>     
>

> Maybe you need additional settings (AUTH, SSL, ...) for the new
> provider, but only they can tell you this.
>

> Regards,
> Andrei
>

Icedove does work, and there is nothing extra required for the provider, we went through that.

Thanks for the reply.
Charlie

Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 18:55:07 +1000
From: Charlie <ariestao@clearmail.com.au> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Kmail - satellite server error... 

Message-ID: <46B5906B.1050200@clearmail.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Can we help you?X

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 06:12:56PM +1000, Charlie wrote:
>
> 

>>>> Posting through IceDove.
>>>>         
>>> Does this mean IceDove works?
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Sending failed:
>>>> Message sending failed since the following recipients were rejected by
>>>> the server:
>>>> xxxxxxx@clearmail.com.au (The server responded: "relaying mail to
>>>>         

> 	^^^^^^^
> Too late, your e-mail address is already in clear in the archives
>

> 
>> Icedove does work, and there is nothing extra required for the 
>> provider, we went through that.
>>     
>

> The next place I'd look would be the kmail bugreports
> (htts://bugs.debian.org/kmail).
>

Couldn't reach that address

https://bugs.debian.org/kmail

Must be busy?

Can't find what you're looking for?X

Thank you, will look later.
Charlie

Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 12:41:44 +0200
From: Stefan Bauer <stefan.bauer@plzk.de> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: ipw2100 + Debian etch + Firmware trouble + 2.6.22 

Message-ID: <46B5A968.1040207@plzk.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Dear users,

since i moved from 2.6.18 to 2.6.22 my wlan interface stopped working. At boot-time my hotplug system (no udev is installed! - because this is not wanted) detects the ipw2100 card and tries to load the ipw2100 module. this task is timing out (after the 60seconds in /sys/class/firmware/timeout). there is no change if i increase this timeout to 100secs or more.

the error message in the kernel-ringbuffer is: 

ipw2100: Detected Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 Network Connection
ipw2100: eth1: Firmware 'ipw2100-1.3.fw' not available or load failed.
ipw2100: eth1: ipw2100_get_firmware failed: -2
ipw2100: eth1: Failed to power on the adapter.
ipw2100: eth1: Failed to start the firmware.
ipw2100Error calling register_netdev.
ACPI: PCI interrupt for device 0000:02:02.0 disabled ipw2100: probe of 0000:02:02.0 failed with error -5

The firmware is present in /lib/firmware as well as in /usr/local/lib/firmware/

Don't know where to look next?X

my wlan interface is ... attached to a ibm thinkpad t40:

02:02.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless LAN 2100 3B Mini PCI Adapter (rev 04)

any help is greatly appreciated

best regards

stefan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFGtaloA2RuWqH7QvoRCillAJ9YnJI0jmoEEHqcgJ8POvJRJbh3IgCcCftA 3RhkFeAXW4NJWp/GZ4Zra/Y=
=yMBC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 11:44:53 +0100
From: Sheridan Hutchinson <Sheridan@Shezza.org> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bridged Network Question 

Message-ID: <46B5AA25.7000804@Shezza.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Wayne Topa wrote:
> I have been using an old laptop as an Access Point for our laptops to
> connect to the internet through the main box -> modem connection.
> The Lan (eth0) is bridged with a Netgear WG511U PCMCIA card (ath0) to
> connect to the gatway computer.
>
> It works fine, as an AP, but has one problem. The AP itself can not
> connect to the internet through the gatway. The only way to update
> the AP's software is to change /etc/network/interfaces from the
> bridged setup to just a Lan setup, reboot, do the update/upgrade,
> change the interfaces file back to the bridged mode and reboot again.
>
> I have googled for an answer to this problem for the past 4 months,
> without finding any answers. Either I didn't use the correct search
> terms or no one else has had the same problem.
>
> I would like to move the AP to an old 500Mhz headless box so that I
> can setup the firewall and a mailserver, etc on it and free up the
> laptop. I can't see how to do that with the above problem.
>
> Here is the current bridged interfaces file. I would appreciate any
> input on how I might go about fixing this.
>
> ------
> /etc/init.d/interfaces
> mapping hotplug
> script grep
> map eth0 ath0
>
> # The primary network interface
> #
> #0000:05:00.0: 3Com PCI 3CCFE575CT Tornado CardBus at 0x4800.
> #Vers LK1.1.19
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet manual
>
> # Netgear WG511U PCMCIA Double 108 Mbps Card
> ## Bring up ath0 with the correct wifi settings
> # "manual" causes it to bring up the interface without TCP/IP (which
> auto ath0
> iface ath0 inet manual
> pre-up wlanconfig ath0 destroy
> pre-up wlanconfig ath0 create wlandev wifi0 wlanmode ap
> # remove the ath0 device when bringing the interface down
> post-down ifconfig ath0 down
> post-down wlanconfig ath0 destroy
> post-down ifconfig eth0 down
> post-down ifconfig br0 down
> post-down brctl delbr br0
> post-down ifconfig eth0 up
> iwpriv ath0 bgscan 0
> wireless-mode master
> wireless-channel 6
> wireless-essid Mtntop_AP
>
> # The Debian Bridge method
> auto br0
> iface br0 inet static
> address 192.168.1.8
> network 192.168.1.0
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> broadcast 192.168.1.255
> gateway 192.168.1.3
> # bridge_ports all # this doesn't bring up ath0
> bridge_ports ath0 eth0
> route add default gateway 192.168.1.3
> ----------------
>
> Thanks for 'any' suggestions!
>
> Wayne
>

Hi bud,

Confused? Frustrated?X

I'm not exactly sure what you're doing however I just run these commands as route:

brctl addbr br0
brctl addif br0 eth1
ifup br0
brctl addif br0 eth0
ifconfig eth0 up

It may or may not help.
xx 

-- 
Regards,
Sheridan Hutchinson
Sheridan@Shezza.org

Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:54:52 -0400 From: Douglas Allan Tutty <dtutty@porchlight.ca> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: less, exit but left content on screen Message-ID: <20070805125452.GA7513@titan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On 8/4/2007 6:06 PM, Tong Sun wrote:
> Package: less
> Version: 394-4
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I remember that I used to be able to exit 'less' by command key 'x' or
> something so that the content just viewed is left on screen, instead of
> being cleared and restored to the screen before invoking 'less'. But I
> found there is no such capability in current less (version 394). Or
> is there?
I'm running standard Etch, with less version 394-4. I've always exited less with 'q', which leaves the screen intact. If -X works, I wonder what is different between our terminals. My $TERM = linux. In any event, less(1) doesn't show a command key 'x' that I can see. Doug.

Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 09:13:04 -0400 From: Douglas Allan Tutty <dtutty@porchlight.ca> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Get display back? Message-ID: <20070805131304.GB7513@titan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Keep the reply on the list please. On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 02:44:45PM +1200, Jeff wrote:
> Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> >Another way to get into the box is to boot the install CD in rescue
> >mode. From the menus, you can get a shell that is chrooted into the
> >box. From there, you can either edit xorg.conf or you may even be able
> >to run dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg.
> >
> >Also, there's an option inbetween a normal boot and an init=/bin/sh,
> >that is 's', for single. This will run through the /etc/rcS.d scripts
> >and prompt for the root password.
> >
> Thanks for that! I booted the single user mode from the Grub Menu and
> got the command prompt from there.
> Ran dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg as root then changed the driver back
> to "nv" and the display is back.
>
So, on to why the nvidia driver isn't working for you. Are you running Etch with stock kernel and have the matching nvidia kernel package, nvidia-xconfig, and nvidia-glx? How did you try to set it up before? Doug.

Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 09:26:28 -0400 From: Frank McCormick <fmccormick@videotron.ca> To: "debian-user@lists.debian.org" <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Subject: Weird cron behavior Message-id: <20070805092628.c6d2066c.fmccormick@videotron.ca> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT I left my machine on overnight ( I usually don't ) and got these messages in my mail this morning: From: root@localhost.localdomain (Cron Daemon) To: root@localhost.localdomain Subject: Cron <root@debian> sudo aptitude update Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 05:10:01 -0400 Hit ftp://gulus.usherbrooke.ca sid Release.gpg Get:1 ftp://gulus.usherbrooke.ca sid/main Translation-en_CA Ign ftp://gulus.usherbrooke.ca sid/main Translation-en_CA Get:2 ftp://gulus.usherbrooke.ca sid/non-free Translation-en_CA Get:3 http://debian-mirrors.sdinet.de sid Release.gpg [189B] Ign http://debian-mirrors.sdinet.de sid/main Translation-en_CA Ign ftp://gulus.usherbrooke.ca sid/non-free Translation-en_CA Get:4 ftp://gulus.usherbrooke.ca sid/contrib Translation-en_CA //big snip // Hit ftp://gulus.usherbrooke.ca sid/main Sources Fetched 6235B in 1s (3375B/s) Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... Reading extended state information... Initializing package states... Building tag database... Deleting obsolete downloaded files It seems cron ran once a minute starting at 5:00 AM and ending at 5:59 AM .....apparently doing the same thing over and over. I havn't added or changed anything -- I am sunning Sid Anybody have any ideas ? Cheers -- Change the world one loan at a time - visit Kiva.org to find out how

Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 09:51:49 -0400 From: rally-l-owner@scifi.squawk.com To: debian-user-digest@lists.debian.org Subject: Request "(post to rally-l)" requires further approval Message-Id: <20070805135149.A367B25B479@parrot.squawk.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1186321909-12362-574" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1186321909-12362-574 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en The request "(post to rally-l)" must be confirmed by debian-user-digest@lists.debian.org and approved by the moderators. Confirmation instructions have been mailed in a separate message. ------------=_1186321909-12362-574 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: Original message Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: <debian-user-digest@lists.debian.org> Delivered-To: rally-l-scifi.squawk.com@parrot.squawk.com Received: from lists.debian.org (host217-43-17-192.range217-43.btcentralplus.com [217.43.17.192]) by parrot.squawk.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0E125B530 for <rally-l@scifi.squawk.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2007 01:14:16 -0400 (EDT) From: debian-user-digest@lists.debian.org To: rally-l@scifi.squawk.com Subject: Message could not be delivered Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 06:13:11 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Message-Id: <20070803051416.9E0E125B530@parrot.squawk.com> X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 1.01d X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain The message was not delivered due to the following reason: Your message was not delivered because the destination server was not reachable within the allowed queue period. The amount of time a message is queued before it is returned depends on local configura- tion parameters. Most likely there is a network problem that prevented delivery, but it is also possible that the computer is turned off, or does not have a mail system running right now. Your message was not delivered within 4 days: Server 74.48.163.89 is not responding. The following recipients did not receive this message: <rally-l@scifi.squawk.com> Please reply to postmaster@lists.debian.org if you feel this message to be in error. [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of rally-l@scifi.squawk.com.zip] ------------=_1186321909-12362-574--

Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 08:52:49 -0500 From: "John W. Foster" <johnwfoster@verizon.net> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Cc: Charlie <ariestao@clearmail.com.au> Subject: Re: Kmail - satellite server error... Message-id: <200708050852.49748.johnwfoster@verizon.net> Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline On Sunday 05 August 2007 02:12, Charlie wrote:
> Posted this to Debian-KDE list without reply. Hope to get some ideas here.
> Posting through IceDove.
>
> Using Debian Etch/Lenny
> Have just been connected to satellite internet provider Clearnetworks who
> have some Linux capable techs on their staff, but have not been able to
> resolve a problem with Kmail 1.9.5 [using KDE 3.5.7] in Debian testing.
>
> If I attempt to send an email to myself, or replying to the test of the
> satellite provider [smtp], or anyone else. Using Kmail 1.9.5 [using KDE
> 3.5.7], with the new email address after setting the accounts up, I get an
> error message:-
>
> Sending failed:
> Message sending failed since the following recipients were rejected by
> the server:
> xxxxxxx@clearmail.com.au (The server responded: "relaying mail to
> clearmail.com.au is not allowed")
> The message will stay in the 'outbox' folder until you either fix the
> problem (e.g. a broken address) or remove the message from the 'outbox'
> folder.
>
> I have no problem sending through the old dialup provider and have used
> Kmail for years. This is a new twist.
>
> Am wondering if someone might point me in the direction of a fix?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Charlie
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Just an idea: Sounds like your mail transport agent app (exim4, sendmail, maybe) is set up to send mail via a relay server instead of being set up to act as your own smtp server. If that is correct then you need to reset it to be the smtp server for your system, if you are using static IPs and have your own domain name. The other alternative is to use the clearnet smtp server as yours and disregard the mail transport issue (much simpler, especially if your system is using DHCP nameserving from Clearnet. In that case you simply set up all of your mail readers icedove, kmail, etc. to use for example "mail.clearmail.com.au" or what ever they tell you is their mailserver name. If this works use it, it's more reliable in most cases, they have massive back up :-) I have a similar set up with verizon smtp is set to incoming.verizon.net for receiving and set to outgoing.verizon.net for sending and I have exim 4 installed to manage local mail and also serve as my domainnames smtp server. I also run teapop for pop3 on my local server. Thus I have two mailing addresses #####@verizon.net for the main mail to which I have kmail set up, and #####@ my.domain.name for local and very private mail. I hope this helps! -- Frosty

Call Pantek today for Open Source Technical Support at 1-877-546-8934 - 24/7/365X

Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 23:24:46 +0900 From: Takehiko Abe <keke@gol.com> To: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Subject: Re: odd xorg-video-intel problem Message-ID: <46B5DDAE.2050107@gol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Andrew J. Barr wrote: > The file /var/log/Xorg.0.log would help with diagnostics. only if I know how to interpret it... There are in total 10 entries marked 'EE', all identical: (EE) intel(0): Unable to write to SDVOCTRL_E for SDVOB Slave 0x70. Is this normal? ... OK, silly question. Errors are not normal. > Also, consider posting to the xorg@lists.freedesktop.org list, a > number of Intel employees are active there. I think I need to do my homework before posting there. And that would be quite a task for me. I am very new to XWindows. > Additionally, consult the driver documentation. I believe you can > turn on a debug mode in the modesetting code by specifying an option > in xorg.conf. This might help you or someone else figure out what's > wrong. Doesn't help me. For instance, with debugging enabled, the above error entry became: (EE) intel(0): Unable to write to SDVOCTRL_E for SDVOB Slave 0x70. (II) intel(0): SDVO: W: 7A 02 (SDVO_CMD_SET_CONTROL_BUS_SWITCH) (II) intel(0): SDVO: W: 7A 02 (SDVO_CMD_SET_CONTROL_BUS_SWITCH) > > My own experience with the 965: > > I have a 965 connected to an widescreen 1440x900 LCD monitor via a VGA > connector. When X starts, it starts in a non-native resolution, but > after I log in the GNOME session software changes the native > resolution which I specified in the Screen Resolution control panel. I wonder how modlines and the control panel interacts. If the setting in a control panel overrides modeline setting, why do I need modelines? btw, I tried xvidtune and it appears no matter what values I specify it says: Sorry: You have requested a mode-line that is not possible or not supported by your hardware configuration. Weird. sigh... I thought I could avoid this kind of hassle by choosing the intel 965G. Thanks, T. End of debian-user-digest Digest V2007 Issue #2100 ************************************************** Received on Sun Aug 5 10:48:42 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 09 2007 - 19:05:40 EDT

Contact Us  Legal Notices  Order Services Online 
Pantek Home  Privacy Policy  IT news  Site Map  Pantek Library