Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:29:25 -0500
From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Mislaid disk space
Message-ID: <46B7A0C5.3050209@cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/06/07 16:44, Adam Gray wrote:
> I have a 40Gb external LaCie USB hard drive, which until recently used
> to contain all my data. I have now bought a 300gb internal drive to
> move everything onto. But having moved some of the stuff over, for
> various reasons I have now mucked up my debian install and want to
> start afresh.
>
> But, for some reason when I deleted my iTunes music library off the external
> drive, it doesn't seem to quite have gone properly... weirdly the
> drive still shows as full when running `df` but from my windows
> installation (on a different HD) it shows as having 16G free space...?
> The iTunes dir is no longer being listed on the drive, but it still
> seems to be taking up space.
>
> Which is inconvenient as I now have a large tar archive of my home
> directory (containing the music) which I can't back up to reinstall
> the OS. So any ideas on what's going on here and if/how I can reclaim
> this free space, preferably without reformatting the drive (it still
> has quite a bit of important stuff on).
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> P.S. df has this to say:
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hdb1 250M 88M 149M 38% /
> tmpfs 252M 0 252M 0% /dev/shm
> /dev/hdb9 220G 29G 181G 14% /home
> /dev/hdb8 361M 69M 273M 20% /tmp
> /dev/hdb5 4.6G 2.8G 1.6G 64% /usr
> /dev/hdb6 2.8G 1.1G 1.6G 40% /var
> /dev/sda1 38G 36G 1.6G 96% /media/sda1
Which device?
What does "du -a" say?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGt6DES9HxQb37XmcRArfhAKDA0rhYuDcmJ5cTVvAuvlW58uNw+QCdF1f6
D3Bbos2siJrPgsMVLuTKVIA=
=Ixyq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:31:03 -0400
From: Douglas Allan Tutty <dtutty@porchlight.ca>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: Stefan Hornburg <racke@linuxia.de>
Subject: JFS suitability [Was Re: Opinions XFS]
Message-ID: <20070806223103.GB13769@titan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Hello Stefan,
We've been having a discussion on debian-user on the differences between
XFS and JFS and where one would be better than the other for different
applications. In the course of the discussion, Justin Piszcz sent a
copy of an email he received from Dave Kleikamp at IBM who doesn't
recommend JFS for enterprise use because it no longer has a full-time
maintainer.
I wondered how an important package like a filesystem would end up in
debian main stable when upstream doesn't recommend it. I thought that
this would by itself have created a release-critical bug that would keep
it out of stable.
Would you care to comment or shed light on this issue?
Please reply to the debian-user mailing list if possible.
Thanks,
Doug Tutty.
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 05:32:11PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 04:29:43PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> >>On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 09:55:28AM -0700, David Brodbeck wrote:
> >>>>On Aug 4, 2007, at 2:42 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >>>>>I'd have to modify that. Instead of NIH, my worry is that since XFS
> >>>>>was designed for a different kernel, it's been "shimmed" into Linux
> >>>>>and so doesn't integrate as well as ext2/3 and ReiserFS. Same
> >>>>>concern with jfs.
> >>>>
> >>>>I suppose that's a valid concern, but in the absence of any evidence
> >>>>of problems caused by it I can't say I'm going to lose any sleep. :)
> >>>
> >>>Given that SGI boxes now use Linux and have dropped Irix but still use
> >>>XFS, I think it pretty likely that they have done a good job of ensuring
> >>>that Linux's XFS is up to snuff.
> >>>
> >>>IBM started JFS version 1 with AIX, then ported it to OS/2 and added
> >>>features to make it version 2, then ported it back to AIX where it is
> >>>the standard FS. They got Linux working on their newer Power servers to
> >>>meet customer demand and ported JFS to linux so that they had a common
> >>>filesystem irrespective of OS.
> >>>
> >>>In both cases, the porting was done or directed by the origionator of the
> >>>filesystem for reasons that impact their bottom line. To some extent
> >>>their reputations are on the line with their filesystems. As they are
> >>>right now, I would trust them both equally well. They each have their
> >>>stronger points that make one more suitable than the other for certain
> >>>uses of the filesystem.
> >>>
> >>
> >>I would too, until I found out JFS has no maintainer.
> >>
> >
> >Yikes. The jfsutils copyright and README.Debian are internally dated in
> >2001 as if they are old packages. However, the changelog.Debian.gz and
> >changelog.gz are June, 2006. xfsprogs have more recent changes. Stefan
> >Hornburg is listed as "responsible for this Debian package".
> >
> >What exactly do you mean that JFS has no maintainer.
>
> It has a maintainer, but he cannot work on it full-time:
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:11:06 -0500
> From: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
> xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,
> zfs on software raid 5
>
> On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 10:29 -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
> >Overall JFS seems the fastest but reviewing the mailing list for JFS it
> >seems like there a lot of problems, especially when people who use JFS >
> 1
> >year, their speed goes to 5 MiB/s over time and the defragfs tool has
> been
> >removed(?) from the source/Makefile and on Google it says not to use it
> >due to corruption.
>
> The defragfs tool was an unported holdover from OS/2, which is why it
> was removed. There never was a working Linux version. I have some
> ideas to improve jfs allocation to avoid fragmentation problems, but jfs
> isn't my full-time job anymore, so I can't promise anything. I'm not
> sure about the corruption claims. I'd like to hear some specifics on
> that.
>
> Anyway, for enterprise use, I couldn't recommend jfs, since there is no
> full-time maintainer.
>
> Thanks,
> Shaggy
> --
> David Kleikamp
> IBM Linux Technology Center
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:58:37 -0400
From: Jose Luis Rivas Contreras <ghostbar38@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Mislaid disk space
Message-ID: <46B7A79D.9030807@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="------------enigA10D3CDF8A5845ECADB89BED"
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigA10D3CDF8A5845ECADB89BED
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Adam Gray wrote:
> I have a 40Gb external LaCie USB hard drive, which until recently used
> to contain all my data. I have now bought a 300gb internal drive to
> move everything onto. But having moved some of the stuff over, for
> various reasons I have now mucked up my debian install and want to
> start afresh.
>=20
> But, for some reason when I deleted my iTunes music library off the ext=
ernal
> drive, it doesn't seem to quite have gone properly... weirdly the
> drive still shows as full when running `df` but from my windows
> installation (on a different HD) it shows as having 16G free space...?
> The iTunes dir is no longer being listed on the drive, but it still
> seems to be taking up space.
>=20
> Which is inconvenient as I now have a large tar archive of my home
> directory (containing the music) which I can't back up to reinstall
> the OS. So any ideas on what's going on here and if/how I can reclaim
> this free space, preferably without reformatting the drive (it still
> has quite a bit of important stuff on).
>=20
>=20
> Thanks!
>=20
> P.S. df has this to say:
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hdb1 250M 88M 149M 38% /
> tmpfs 252M 0 252M 0% /dev/shm
> /dev/hdb9 220G 29G 181G 14% /home
> /dev/hdb8 361M 69M 273M 20% /tmp
> /dev/hdb5 4.6G 2.8G 1.6G 64% /usr
> /dev/hdb6 2.8G 1.1G 1.6G 40% /var
> /dev/sda1 38G 36G 1.6G 96% /media/sda1
If you deleted it from your Desktop manager then could had gone to some
`/.hided' directory like `/media/sda1/.Trash' and that's what could be
taking space...
Regards,
Jose Luis.
--=20
ghostbar on debian linux 'sid' 2.6.22 x86_64-SMP - #382503
Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://linuxtachira.org
http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es
San Crist=C3=B3bal, Venezuela. http://chaslug.org.ve
Fingerprint =3D 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118
--------------enigA10D3CDF8A5845ECADB89BED
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGt6edOKCtW8rKsRgRAp0oAJ9gk/6o4s9L4iOIerR6L5rRVMayVQCgiyZZ
GpHERKAUAeZx1svfMWaNZfQ=
=75CC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enigA10D3CDF8A5845ECADB89BED--
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:59:10 -0400
From: "Francois Duranleau" <xiao.bai.xiong@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ext3fs errors with kernel 2.6.18 but not with 2.4.27
Message-ID: <8eb883950708061559y351aed91ucdcd111b83c05712@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On 8/4/07, Wayne Topa <linuxone@intergate.com> wrote:
>
> I also have the ABIT KT7 and it has gone from kernels 2.4.27 ->
> 2.6.18-4 with no CRC errors showing up at all. It's only been running
> for 5-6 years. CPU Fan has been changed twice but other then that,
> its fine.
I have mine since december 2000, and as I pointed out, the CRC errors
are occuring with 2.4.27.
Anyways, I upgraded the BIOS, and nothing's changed. I still get CRC
errors. I will try to disable the VIA driver and see what happens.
--
Francois
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:05:12 -0500
From: cothrige <cothrige@bellsouth.net>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Capture of video stream..
Message-ID: <87ir7sclhz.fsf@celephais.home.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
"Mumia W.." <paduille.4061.mumia.w+nospam@earthlink.net> writes:
> On 08/06/2007 01:53 PM, ISHWAR RATTAN wrote:
>>
>> I want to capture streamed video from a youtube
>> link...
[snip]
>
> Maybe the '-dumpstream' option to mplayer can capture such streams.
>
> If you're using the Firefox web browser, the "Fast Video Download"
> extension can make downloading Youtube videos easy.
>
There is a website www.keepvid.com which will make youtube videos
downloadable as well. This can then be converted to divx or such using
mencoder. You just have to watch out for some odd framerates which can
throw off the resulting playback.
Patrick
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:07:39 -0700
From: "Michael M." <mcubed@slashmail.org>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: How to disable ipv6 tunneling
Message-Id: <1186441659.18444.85.camel@amdrifter.domain.actdsltmp>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 21:15 +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 04:57:30PM +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> >> I run Etch and at every boot, as message on the screen states, it
> >> activates some "ipv6 over ipv4 tunneling driver" and it lasts several
> >> seconds. I don't need ipv6. How can it be disabled?
> >
> > I think you can blacklist the ipv6 module.
> >
> > A
>
> I blacklisted the modules, now it shows a message about not loading it,
> but waites for 10 seconds anyway. Does someone have a better idea?
I made the following change to /etc/modprobe.d/aliases
alias net-pf-10 off
# alias net-pf-10 ipv6
(added the first line; commented out the second line)
I don't know if that's the "right" way to do it. It worked for me.
--
Michael M. ++ Portland, OR ++ USA
"No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions
of absolute reality; even larks and katydids are supposed, by some, to
dream." --S. Jackson
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 19:47:04 -0400
From: "Yannick Gingras" <ygingras@ygingras.net>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Emacs 22 on Debian Etch
Message-ID: <df3d4af50708061647i1f58ab71td5812668acca8dcf@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,
Emacs 22 is quite an editor and I'm sure many of you are already
using it. It is in Sid but no luck yet for those running Etch, at
least those with an architecture different from i386.
I ended up building my own .debs, this is a straight forward procedure
but it's a bit obscure and it could seem daunting for beginners. I
decided to write a micro-howto:
http://ygingras.net/b/2007/8/emacs-22-on-debian-etch
I hope this will help those still waiting for amd64 binaries to hit backports.
--
Yannick Gingras
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 01:42:25 +0200
From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.org>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: replacement for apt-listchanges?
Message-ID: <20070806234225.GM14541@prunille.vinc17.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 2007-08-06 15:13:10 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > because breakage due to python occurs too frequently), it is importan=
t
>=20
> I still don't have any evidence that python breaks frequently.
This is based on personal experience. Unfortunately I haven't kept
statistics, but I'd say, taking into account the serious bugs that
directly affected the use of my machines and those I could avoid
(e.g. thanks to apt-listbugs), this should be about 4 per year. This
may seem low, but this is much more than what I get with the other
base packages (libc6, perl, xorg...).
--=20
Vincent Lef=E8vre <vincent(at)vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 20:05:44 -0400
From: Douglas Allan Tutty <dtutty@porchlight.ca>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: replacement for apt-listchanges?
Message-ID: <20070807000544.GA14797@titan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 01:42:25AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2007-08-06 15:13:10 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > because breakage due to python occurs too frequently), it is important
> >
> > I still don't have any evidence that python breaks frequently.
>
> This is based on personal experience. Unfortunately I haven't kept
> statistics, but I'd say, taking into account the serious bugs that
> directly affected the use of my machines and those I could avoid
> (e.g. thanks to apt-listbugs), this should be about 4 per year. This
> may seem low, but this is much more than what I get with the other
> base packages (libc6, perl, xorg...).
Can you describe the breakage? I've found that packages that rely on
python for a GUI break (GUI freezes), I've always blamed it on the GUI.
Base python itself I've never had break.
Doug.
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:49:01 GMT
From: "s. keeling" <keeling@nucleus.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: cups yet again
Message-ID: <slrnfbfgbq.hhi.keeling@heretic.nucleus.com>
graham <graham@theseamans.net>:
> Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 05:02:07PM +0100, graham wrote:
> >> Yet another cups problem (the one program which makes me feel like I do
> >> when running windows - like putting a foot through the computer).
> >
> > So why run cups? Use LPRng and Apsfilter or foomatic print filters.
>
> Cos what I'd understood from other threads was that this would mean
> swimming against the tide, since cups is now the default for both debian
Yes, it is swimming against the tide. Big deal, && fsck 'em.
CUPS has made a mess of *nix printing. All you need to do to enable
*nix printing is find your printer's driver, install lpr(ng), then
hack /etc/printcap (which is pretty damned simple):
lp0|To Your Left: \
:lp=/dev/lp0: \
:force_localhost: \
:if=/usr/bin/foomatic-rip: \
:ppd=/usr/local/ppd/Epson-Stylus_Photo_870-Stp870p.upp.ppd: \
:sd=/var/spool/lpd/lp: \
:mx#0:sh:
It just works. CUPS is *way* unnecessary. The biggest problem with
*nix printing is trying to figure out how to install something without
dragging in CUPS too. :-P Even if you have lpr(ng) installed, CUPS
chooses to replace them, and tends to get away with it! Be vigilant.
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292
- - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me.
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 19:40:08 -0500
From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: replacement for apt-listchanges?
Message-ID: <46B7BF68.9070602@cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/06/07 18:42, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2007-08-06 15:13:10 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> because breakage due to python occurs too frequently), it is important
>> I still don't have any evidence that python breaks frequently.
>
> This is based on personal experience. Unfortunately I haven't kept
> statistics, but I'd say, taking into account the serious bugs that
> directly affected the use of my machines and those I could avoid
> (e.g. thanks to apt-listbugs), this should be about 4 per year. This
> may seem low, but this is much more than what I get with the other
> base packages (libc6, perl, xorg...).
You *know* the answer you're going to receive.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGt79oS9HxQb37XmcRAg5OAKCduUnJ3i/g0Q//71RoU9nQcDx6TwCfUrHl
0HO32FKlAuAHrywiUjeAQMM=
=j1tq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 01:10:51 GMT
From: "s. keeling" <keeling@nucleus.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: replacement for apt-listchanges?
Message-ID: <slrnfbfhkc.hhi.keeling@heretic.nucleus.com>
Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.org>:
> On 2007-08-06 15:13:10 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > because breakage due to python occurs too frequently), it is important
> >
> > I still don't have any evidence that python breaks frequently.
>
> This is based on personal experience. Unfortunately I haven't kept
> statistics, but I'd say, taking into account the serious bugs that
> directly affected the use of my machines and those I could avoid
> (e.g. thanks to apt-listbugs), this should be about 4 per year. This
> may seem low, but this is much more than what I get with the other
> base packages (libc6, perl, xorg...).
You should not be running unstable. This is what stable, and Debian
itself, were created for. Sorry, no sympathy from here.
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292
- - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me.
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:48:58 -0700
From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: replacement for apt-listchanges?
Message-ID: <20070807014858.GL28897@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/jkxxxtAhYIHVDuh"
Content-Disposition: inline
--/jkxxxtAhYIHVDuh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 07:40:08PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 08/06/07 18:42, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2007-08-06 15:13:10 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >>> because breakage due to python occurs too frequently), it is important
> >> I still don't have any evidence that python breaks frequently.
> >=20
> > This is based on personal experience. Unfortunately I haven't kept
> > statistics, but I'd say, taking into account the serious bugs that
> > directly affected the use of my machines and those I could avoid
> > (e.g. thanks to apt-listbugs), this should be about 4 per year. This
> > may seem low, but this is much more than what I get with the other
> > base packages (libc6, perl, xorg...).
>=20
> You *know* the answer you're going to receive.
i think s.keeling already did it...=20
A
--/jkxxxtAhYIHVDuh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGt8+KaIeIEqwil4YRAv/JAJ9k0HJW4pR2AMbcVEfF20yGTXErMgCg4o4q
CUHu1dNGzUYA0c1GNI1Rqtc=
=Tvlq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--/jkxxxtAhYIHVDuh--
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 22:37:56 -0300
From: "Adriano Bonat" <adrianob@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: CD/DVD Burner Configuration
Message-ID: <6bb4c8cb0708061837t2d712d47tf760ec0feeef127@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Hello guys,
I tried to burn a CD with k3b, and got an error from wodim, the same as follow:
adriano@heisenberg:~$ wodim -scanbus
/usr/bin/wodim: No such file or directory.
Cannot open SCSI driver!
For possible targets try 'wodim --devices' or 'wodim -scanbus'.
For possible transport specifiers try 'wodim dev=help'.
For IDE/ATAPI devices configuration, see the file README.ATAPI.setup from
the wodim documentation.
then I tried:
adriano@heisenberg:~$ wodim dev=/dev/cdrw -scanbus
scsibus1:
1,0,0 100) 'MATSHITA' 'DVD-RAM UJ-840S ' '1.11' Removable CD-ROM
yes, there it is. So my question is: how can I fix this, because to do
something with the burner i'll need always to specify the 'dev'
parameter...
Thanks in advance.
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 09:53:26 +0800
From: "Kun Niu" <haoniukun@gmail.com>
To: "Andrei Popescu" <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Which kernel should I choose with the following cpu?
Message-ID: <ec9e7ff10708061853y3c846e56s934d5a48b05e0e98@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 10:28:48AM +0800, Kun Niu wrote:
> > Thank you for tracing my problem.
> > It's true that my root system is of ext3 format.
> > I only got the compiled image from the mirror site security.debian.org.
> > I don't know if ext3 is compiled is built into the kernel or compiled
> > as a module.
> > Do I have to check that before I reboot the system?
>
> Not really. If you use stock kernels and it was installed correctly it
> should just work.
>
> > I'm sure that my cpu is hyper-thread enabled.
> > Shall I choose the 686 version of 2.6.18 kernel in the new source tree?
>
> Definitely.
>
> Regards,
> Andrei
Thank you for your suggestion.:)
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 23:16:22 -0400
From: "William Walter" <wwalterw@gmail.com>
To: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: New hard drive problem
Message-ID: <e6e8ab20708062016s54aae4cbnec02546caf8a1915@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_144751_32910025.1186456582133"
------=_Part_144751_32910025.1186456582133
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
i've a computer with debian etch. i've recently added a new sata hard drive
and enter the harddrive in /etc/fstab. It was working fine. Suddenly
today Debian etch is not booting properly. I'm getting
the following errors:
Begin:Mounting root file system ...
Begin:Running /scripts/local-top ...
Done.
Begin:Running /scripts/local-premount ...
Done.
mount:Mounting /dev/sda1 on /root failed:No such Device
Begin:Running /scripts/local-bottom...
Done.
Begin:Running /scripts/init-bottom...
mount:Mounting /root/dev on /dev/.static/dev failed:No such file or
directory
Done.
mount:Mounting /sys on /root/sys failed:No such file or directory
mount:Mounting /proc on /root/proc failed:No such file or directory
Target file system doesn't have /sbin/init
BusyBox v1.1.3(Debian 1:1.1.3-3)Built in Shell(ash)
Enter 'help' for a list of built in commands
/bin/sh:can't access tty;job control turned off
(initramfs)
I've checked the cables it's fine. One more thing i like to mention. When i
disconnect the brand new hard drive no problem on booting. The problem
is only when i add the new hard drive. Can anyone kindly help me find the
problem? Thanks.
------=_Part_144751_32910025.1186456582133
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
i've a computer with debian etch. i've recently added a new sata hard drive<br>and enter the harddrive in /etc/fstab. It was working fine. Suddenly <br>today Debian etch is not booting properly. I'm getting<br>
the following errors:<br><br>Begin:Mounting root file system ...<br>Begin:Running /scripts/local-top ...<br>Done.<br>Begin:Running /scripts/local-premount ...<br>Done.<br>mount:Mounting /dev/sda1 on /root failed:No such Device
<br><br>Begin:Running /scripts/local-bottom...<br>Done.<br>Begin:Running /scripts/init-bottom...<br>mount:Mounting /root/dev on /dev/.static/dev failed:No such file or directory<br>Done.<br>mount:Mounting /sys on /root/sys failed:No such file or directory
<br><br>mount:Mounting /proc on /root/proc failed:No such file or directory<br>Target file system doesn't have /sbin/init<br><br>BusyBox v1.1.3(Debian 1:1.1.3-3)Built in Shell(ash)<br>Enter 'help' for a list of built in commands
<br>/bin/sh:can't access tty;job control turned off<br>(initramfs)<br><br> I've checked the cables it's fine. One more thing i like to mention. When i <br>disconnect the brand new hard drive no problem on booting. The problem
<br> is only when i add the new hard drive. Can anyone kindly help me find the<br> problem? Thanks.
------=_Part_144751_32910025.1186456582133--
End of debian-user-digest Digest V2007 Issue #2116
**************************************************
Received on Mon Aug 6 23:42:03 2007