Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 12:44:29 -0400
From: Wayne Topa <linuxone@intergate.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Set up postfix
Message-ID: <20070807164429.GB4710@buddy.mtntop.home>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
rocky(rocky2winnie@gmail.com) is reported to have said:
> Hey,
>
> I'm trying to follow the tutorial from http://workaround.org/articles/ispmail-etch
> to set up the postfix. dpkg -l | grep postfix gives me the following
> information:
>
I am following the same Tutorial, along with other things, and am at
the virtual alias maps section. I do not have the problems you show
below.
How far into the Tutorial are you when you got the below messages?
> LIJIANG:~# dpkg -l | grep postfix
> ii postfix 2.3.8-2+b1 A
> high-performance mail transport agent
> ii postfix-mysql 2.3.8-2+b1
> MYSQL map support for Postfix
Mine are newer
postfix & postfix-mysql 2.4.3-1
but the below coments "should" still be valid.
> But ps aux | grep postfix tells me there's no process called postfix
> running. Even after /etc/init.d/postfix restart I got the same result.
> The /var/log/mail.log tells me the following information:
>
> Aug 7 23:02:19 woody sm-mta[24462]: l77DqINI023401: SYSERR(root):
> hash map "Alias0": missing map file /etc/mail/aliases.db: No such file
^^^^ ????
> or directory
>
Do you have a file called /etc/aliases? What is in it?
Check out the postalias man page. man postalias
I am adapting the Tutorial to testing so this may not mean anything,
but at the point I am in the tutorial, I do not have a
/etc/mail/aliases.db file either.
Greping for "aliases" in the /etc/postfiix dir, I only come up with
/etc/aliases in the main.cf file. I do have an aliases and a
aliases.db file, but in /etc/.
> Then I tried to use telnet to test by entering telnet 127.0.0.1 25 and
> it gives me the below result:
>
> LIJIANG:~# telnet 127.0.0.1 25
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> Connected to 127.0.0.1.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 ;; ESMTP connection timed out; no servers could be reached
> Sendmail 8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 23:09:18 +0800; (No
> UCE/UBE) logging access from: woody.2ndsite.in(OK)-root@woody.
> 2ndsite.in [127.0.0.1]
> ehlo 2ndsite.in
> 250-;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached Hello
> root@woody.2ndsite.in [127.0.0.1], pleased to meet you
> 250 ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
>
>
> Can any of you help me to correctly set up the postfix please?
Wayne
--
Every program is a part of some other program, and rarely fits.
_______________________________________________________
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:47:17 +0000
From: bob.middaugh@comcast.net (Bob Middaugh)
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: How to get Tomcat4-webapps for OpenNMS
Message-Id: <080720071647.16230.46B8A215000DC9F500003F66220730003308099A0E0B0B0703D20D010D@comcast.net>
Hi,
I'm trying to install OpenNMS on the latest version of Debian. I'm using the How-To from here: http://www.netstatz.com, and I'm at this point: http://www.netstatz.com/xenonms/Debian_ONMS_HOWTO_2.4-3.html#ss3.3
When I run: apt-get install opennms opennms-doc opennms-contrib tomcat4-webapps tomcat4-admin
I get: Reading Package list...done followed by building dependency tree...Done
and on the next line I get: E: Couldn't find package tomcat4-webapps
I suppose what this is telling me is that via apt-get from the OpenNMS site, I can't get tomcat4-webapps. When I go to the OpenNMS FTP server I see they have rpm's of this package and the Tomcat package, but I don't think this helps me.
If I look in the Debian package manager, I see choices for Tomcat5, but OpenNMS can't use Tomcat5.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to how I can get tomcat4-webapps installed so I can move on?
The whole reason I'm building this Debian box is for running OpenNMS.
Thanks,
Bob
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:29:46 -0700
From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: dumb question about using php
Message-ID: <20070807172945.GU28897@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CJCg3p2l15m1juT/"
Content-Disposition: inline
--CJCg3p2l15m1juT/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 04:53:19PM +0000, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> Dear Debianists
>
> I downloaded a small free software from the following location:
>
> http://webscripts.softpedia.com/script/Scientific-Engineering-Ruby/Chemis=
try/McCabe-Thiele-Method-for-an-Ideal-Binary-Mixture-31835.html
>
> I unzipped it and three little files appeared.
>
> Two look like PHP files. They have the file extension .m.
>
> The other file is a gif file and is probably some sample graphical output.
>
> My dumb question for the day is:
>
>
> How do I call up php e.g. at a terminal window and then get it to execute=
=20
> the .m files?
>
> Is php automatically installed in a bog standard etch desktop installatio=
n?
apt-cache search is your friend.
andrew@basement:~$ apt-cache search php interpreter
gs-esp - The Ghostscript PostScript interpreter - ESP version
kmflcomp - KMFL Compiler
libapache-mod-suphp - Apache module to run php scripts with the owner
permissions
libapache2-mod-suphp - Apache2 module to run php scripts with the
owner permissions
libkmflcomp0 - KMFL compiler library
php5 - server-side, HTML-embedded scripting language (meta-package)
php5-cgi - server-side, HTML-embedded scripting language (CGI binary)
php5-cli - command-line interpreter for the php5 scripting language
scummvm - free implementation of LucasArts' S.C.U.M.M interpreter
suphp-common - Common files for mod suphp
apt-cache show php5-cli.... probably not installed.
A
--CJCg3p2l15m1juT/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGuKwJaIeIEqwil4YRAhTKAKCX08Cp/jaciynF9X3eZSKW5Md3RgCgnz0n
cMnqbzYh0fLHTWyKreqbN14=
=s3Nw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--CJCg3p2l15m1juT/--
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:06:39 +0100
From: Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: How to get Tomcat4-webapps for OpenNMS
Message-ID: <20070807180639.6eb53a98@po>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:47:17 +0000
bob.middaugh@comcast.net (Bob Middaugh) wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to install OpenNMS on the latest version of Debian. I'm
> using the How-To from here: http://www.netstatz.com, and I'm at this
> point:
> http://www.netstatz.com/xenonms/Debian_ONMS_HOWTO_2.4-3.html#ss3.3
>
> When I run: apt-get install opennms opennms-doc opennms-contrib
> tomcat4-webapps tomcat4-admin
>
> I get: Reading Package list...done followed by building dependency
> tree...Done
>
> and on the next line I get: E: Couldn't find package tomcat4-webapps
>
> I suppose what this is telling me is that via apt-get from the
> OpenNMS site, I can't get tomcat4-webapps. When I go to the OpenNMS
> FTP server I see they have rpm's of this package and the Tomcat
> package, but I don't think this helps me.
>
> If I look in the Debian package manager, I see choices for Tomcat5,
> but OpenNMS can't use Tomcat5.
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions as to how I can get tomcat4-webapps
> installed so I can move on?
>
> The whole reason I'm building this Debian box is for running OpenNMS.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Bob
>
>
>
tomcat4 is no longer available in etch. You could try installing it
directly from apache.org, or consider setting up a sarge installation
instead.
--
Liam
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 12:45:18 -0400
From: "percy tiglao" <prtiglao@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Issues with ethernet in testing/lenny
Message-ID: <aec19dbb0708070945y7f1f4e2fkaaebaf338ba88f4c@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
> On 8/6/07, Nigel Henry <cave.dnb@tiscali.fr> wrote:
> > Hi Percy. As nobody has replied yet, I may as well throw in some stuff.
> >
> > If Vista is correct the vendor/device id's for the card should be 8086 10c0.
> > If you run lspci -v , is the card showing on the list?
>
> lspci is not yet installed, I'll be installing that and will post the results
> of that in my next email. Ditto for the lsmod advice that I snipped out.
Okay, it is definitly showing 8086 10c0, but lspci does not recognize it.
Here's the line:
00:19.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Unknown device 10c0 (rev 02)
So it is definitly there, but the driver isn't working...
--Percy
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:31:41 -0700
From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: what brings up the wireless network interface
Message-ID: <20070807173140.GV28897@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Tm6VLls/w6NsRApE"
Content-Disposition: inline
--Tm6VLls/w6NsRApE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 12:19:44PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Using Debian stable (Etch), 2.6.18-4-686 kernel on Debian Dell Inspiron
> e1505. The wireless card (from lshw output is)
>=20
[...]
> The relevant stanza in /etc/network/interfaces is
>=20
> # allow-hotplug eth2
> # auto eth2
> # iface eth2 inet dhcp
> # wireless-essid SomeThing
> # wireless-mode Managed
>=20
> I commented out this stanza and did
>=20
> $sudo ifconfig eth2 down
>=20
> Even after that, eth2 interface comes up after some time for no reason. I
> believe it is due to dhclient, since I see messages like the following
> in /var/log/syslog
>=20
is NetworkManager running? if so, surf to it on the desktop and turn
off "Enable Roaming" or whatever it is for that card.=20
hth
A
--Tm6VLls/w6NsRApE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGuKx8aIeIEqwil4YRAqM2AKCA2RFL8SIgfC9oYnKiM2gwAho/eQCgvg8V
chPfBGKVK1mnuVxAWzdC36Q=
=dLkT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Tm6VLls/w6NsRApE--
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 12:19:51 -0500
From: Owen Heisler <owenh000@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: A basic question about apt-cdrom
Message-ID: <20070807171951.GA14721@owenh.hopto.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
On Tue, 2007.08.07 18:35, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> After adding a CD-ROM with `apt-cdrom', running `apt-get update' will be
> enough? Or should I also run `apt-get dist-upgrade' as a third step?
Using apt-cdrom is enough as far as I know; it will add the apt source entry
and create the list of what packages are on the CD so apt knows what is there.
Whether you upgrade (using "apt-get upgrade" or "apt-get dist-upgrade") using
the newly available packages is up to you.
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:20:17 -0300
From: "Adriano Bonat" <adrianob@gmail.com>
To: "Jonathan Kaye" <jdkaye10@yahoo.es>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: CD/DVD Burner Configuration
Message-ID: <6bb4c8cb0708071020i69cc2930h94bcd14eea9475d3@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
dev=/dev/cdrw
my kernel isnt the default for Debian etch, i just recompiled a new
one, so i think that the problem can be around this...
Thanks.
On 8/7/07, Jonathan Kaye <jdkaye10@yahoo.es> wrote:
> Adriano Bonat wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your advice, shame on the lack of reply-to :)
> >
> > The link to cdrecord dont change anything. And about the custom
> > parameter, it is in the programs sections of k3b, in the "user
> > parameters" tab.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > <snip>
> Hi Adriano,
> I have no special parameter settings. What did you need to put in there?
> Cheers,
> Jonathan
>
> --
> Registerd Linux user #445917 at http://counter.li.org/
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:25:30 +0200
From: Jonathan Kaye <jdkaye10@yahoo.es>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: CD/DVD Burner Configuration
Message-ID: <f9a9u5$k9j$1@sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Adriano Bonat wrote:
> dev=/dev/cdrw
>
> my kernel isnt the default for Debian etch, i just recompiled a new
> one, so i think that the problem can be around this...
>
> Thanks.
>
Ok, mine are found at /dev/hdc and /dev/hdd and they're mount
as /media/cdrom0 and /media/cdrom1, respectively.
Cheers,
Jonathan
--
Registerd Linux user #445917 at http://counter.li.org/
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 19:28:47 +0200
From: Nyizsnyik Ferenc <nyizsa@bluebottle.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: dumb question about using php
Message-ID: <20070807192847.037a9637@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:53:19 +0000
"Michael Fothergill" <mikef20000@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Debianists
>
> I downloaded a small free software from the following location:
>
> http://webscripts.softpedia.com/script/Scientific-Engineering-Ruby/Chemistry/McCabe-Thiele-Method-for-an-Ideal-Binary-Mixture-31835.html
>
> I unzipped it and three little files appeared.
>
> Two look like PHP files. They have the file extension .m.
>
> The other file is a gif file and is probably some sample graphical
> output.
>
> My dumb question for the day is:
>
>
> How do I call up php e.g. at a terminal window and then get it to
> execute the .m files?
>
> Is php automatically installed in a bog standard etch desktop
> installation?
>
> Comments appreciated.
>
> Regards
>
> Michael Fothergill
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> The next generation of Hotmail is here! http://www.newhotmail.co.uk
>
>
No, they are not PHP files; they are Matlab functions. You should be
able to run them using Octave. I had to change line 43 of
McCabeThiele.m, from AXIS (capital) to axis (lower case).
This way it displayed a graph started without parameters. Since I'm
an electronic engineer and in no way familiar with distillation (except
the final products, that is), I have no idea what output the function
should provide.
--
Szia:
Nyizsa.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Free pop3 email with a spam filter.
http://www.bluebottle.com/tag/5
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:47:12 -0700
From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: How to add dir to path
Message-ID: <20070807174712.GW28897@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NAuYj0K7Umiq33rm"
Content-Disposition: inline
--NAuYj0K7Umiq33rm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 06:24:08PM +0200, Manon Metten wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>=20
> On 8/7/07, Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>=20
> Do something like this
> >
> > $ export PATH=3D~/scripts:$PATH
> >
> > If you put it into the appropriate startup script it will get done
> > every time.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> I was looking for some kind of 'path' command but could not find anything
> alike. I didn't know of 'export'.
$PATH is an environment variable like any other and gets assigned a
value in the same way as any other. export is used to make a variable
available to other processes that come after the one spawned by the
assignment process. Thus any process that is a child of the parent of
the export statement gets access to that variable.=20
so this is just three actions jammed together and its processed in a way
better expressed like this:
export ( assign the value of (concatenating ~/script: and ( the expanded
value of PATH )) to PATH )
using standard mathematical parenthesis precedence.=20
start with the inner parenthesis: expand the value of PATH, that is
what PATH is current assigned. Next parenthesis, concatenate ~/script:
and the previous result (the value of PATH). Next parenthesis, assign
the previous result (concatenationg) to the variable PATH. Next
parenthesis, export that value to the next level up in the hierarchy
so that other processes can access it.=20
This assignment will only exist in the shell in which it
executed. When you exit that shell, it will disappear along with that
shell. That's why you put somewhere where it will get started for
every shell...
A
next comes lisp ;)
--NAuYj0K7Umiq33rm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGuLAgaIeIEqwil4YRAprZAJ44yNqUayYcyYA0BPB7P0kLOaUxEwCfW/sk
GjNCAV2E5wBbPpfpzy+rYWM=
=b7fn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--NAuYj0K7Umiq33rm--
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 19:35:06 +0200
From: Nyizsnyik Ferenc <nyizsa@bluebottle.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: How to add dir to path
Message-ID: <20070807193506.5e9d9f06@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:24:08 +0200
"Manon Metten" <manon.metten@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On 8/7/07, Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> Do something like this
> >
> > $ export PATH=~/scripts:$PATH
> >
> > If you put it into the appropriate startup script it will get done
> > every time.
>
>
>
> I was looking for some kind of 'path' command but could not find
> anything alike. I didn't know of 'export'.
>
> I just found out that if I add my dir to /etc/profile it's available
> every time.
>
> Thanks, Manon.
Yes, it will be; for you and for people that have a /scripts directory
in their home folders. It will not do any harm for the ones who don't,
but it's not a nice solution.
I would rather you checked your ~/.bash_profile file.
--
Szia:
Nyizsa.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get a free email account with anti spam protection.
http://www.bluebottle.com/tag/2
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 19:20:12 +0200
From: Florian Kulzer <florian.kulzer+debian@icfo.es>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: apt-get: broken dependencies
Message-ID: <20070807172012.GA31038@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 17:45:18 +0200, Hans Vogelsberger wrote:
> Since one week or so apt-get is broken because of unmet dependencies on my
> =E2=86=92 AMD64, Aspire 4200, Debian, mirror http://ftp.at.debian.org/de=
bian/
> =E2=86=92 testing.
>
> There should be a bug report, but I do not know against which of the five=
=20
> packages apt-get, gcc-4.2-base, lib32stdc++6, glibc-2.6.1, or dpkg. Some=
=20
> further packages also seem to depend on the same 'old' version of=20
> gcc-4.2-base.
The dependencies look OK to me: Your output below shows that the new
version of lib32stdc++6 requires gcc-4.2-base version 4.2-20070712-1,
which is the version currently in Lenny. The root of your problem seems
to be a known bug of lib32z1 (fixed in the meantime) which blocks the
installation of libc6-i386 (and everything else).
> Experience shows that bug reporting against the wrong packa=
ge=20
> leads to no consequences at all. This would be more than disastrous.=20
> Testing without upgrades is absolutely unusable. I would have to change t=
o=20
> Ubuntu after having used Debian testing since it came up - in the times o=
f=20
> Potato, wasn't it?
Something about the meaning of the words "testing" and "Ubuntu" comes to
mind, but I think it is better if I let it slide.
> The following error messages I had to translate from German, only a few o=
f=20
> them matched with readable texts I found in /bin/apt-get, so please excus=
e=20
> if there are mistakes.
You can run "LANG=3DC somecommand" and you will get the messages of
"somecommand" in English.
> Errors after apt-get upgrade, apt-get dist-upgrade and apt-get=20
> deselect-upgrade (exactly the same text):
>
> Package lists are read... done
> Dependency tree is built... done
> You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> lib32stdc++6: depends: gcc-4.2-base (=3D 4.2-20070712-1) but 4.2-200706=
27-1=20
> is installed
> locales: depends: glibc-2.6-1
> E: Unmet dependencies. Try to use -f.
Most likely this is only a consequence of the lib32z1 problem and will
go away as soon as the latter is fixed.
> Errors after apt-get -f install:
>
> (Reading data base ... 88142 files and dictionaries are installed.)
> Package lists are read.
> Preparing to replace libc6-i386 2.5-9 (by .../libc6-i386_2.6-2_amd64.deb)=
=20
> ...
> Unpacking replacement for libc6-i386 ...
> dpkg: Error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-i386_2.6-2_amd64.deb=
=20
> (--unpack):
> Trying to overwrite =C2=BB/usr/lib32=C2=AB which is also in lib32z1
> Errors occurred while processing:
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-i386_2.6-2_amd64.deb
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
dpkg --force-overwrite -i /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-i386_2.6-2_amd64.deb
followed by
apt-get install -f
should fix this.
> When trying to remove one or all of the above files, apt-get threatens to=
=20
> delete several screenfuls of files, including some which I need and use=
=20
> every day.
That is to be expected if you try to remove important system libraries
and related packages.
> This is, what aptitude does, therefore I never used this=20
> program.
No, this is not what aptitude does, unless it is used by someone who
does not understand the Debian packaging system and who has not bothered
to read aptitude's excellent documentation (available in four
languages).
> '--reinstall install' shows no effect at all.
> After updating to kernel 2.6.21 some more insufficiencies showed up,=20
> especially during boot procedures. I shall ask for them separately when=
=20
> they become bothering too much.
--=20
Regards, | http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer
Florian |
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 23:02:19 +0530
From: Kumar Appaiah <akumar@iitm.ac.in>
To: Michael Fothergill <mikef20000@hotmail.com>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: dumb question about using php
Message-ID: <20070807173219.GA9359@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 04:53:19PM +0000, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> Dear Debianists
>
> I downloaded a small free software from the following location:
>
> http://webscripts.softpedia.com/script/Scientific-Engineering-Ruby/Chemistry/McCabe-Thiele-Method-for-an-Ideal-Binary-Mixture-31835.html
>
> I unzipped it and three little files appeared.
These are Matlab scripts. PHP is wrong information on the website you
mention.
Your best bet is to run in using GNU Octave on Debian GNU/Linux.
apt-get install octave2.9
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:53:44 +0600
From: "S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu)" <me@lavluda.com>
To: Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: A basic question about apt-cdrom (was: Handling apt-get,
apt-cdrom, sources.list, cdroms.list)
Message-Id: <1186530824.10168.1.camel@localhost>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-P1dCjgQIbTCatdzpaWN8"
--=-P1dCjgQIbTCatdzpaWN8
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 18:35 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Hi.
>
> After adding a CD-ROM with `apt-cdrom', running `apt-get update' will be
> enough? Or should I also run `apt-get dist-upgrade' as a third step?
>
> I couldn't find an answer in the Debian documentation.
>
> Tnanks for any reply,
> Rodolfo
>
>
apt-cdrom is enough. Even you don't need apt-get update.
--
S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu)
web application developer
somewherein...
Blog: www.lavluda.com
Do you blog ???
Start blogging in Bangla www.somewhereinblog.net
--=-P1dCjgQIbTCatdzpaWN8
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.12.1">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 18:35 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">Hi.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">After adding a CD-ROM with `apt-cdrom', running `apt-get update' will be</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">enough? Or should I also run `apt-get dist-upgrade' as a third step?</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">I couldn't find an answer in the Debian documentation.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">Tnanks for any reply,</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">Rodolfo</FONT>
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
apt-cdrom is enough. Even you don't need apt-get update.<BR>
<TABLE CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="0" WIDTH="100%">
<TR>
<TD>
<PRE>
--
S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu)
web application developer
somewherein...
Blog: <A HREF="http://www.lavluda.com">www.lavluda.com</A>
Do you blog ???
Start blogging in Bangla <A HREF="http://www.somewhereinblog.net">www.somewhereinblog.net</A>
</PRE>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</BODY>
</HTML>
--=-P1dCjgQIbTCatdzpaWN8--
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 20:02:24 +0200
From: "Manon Metten" <manon.metten@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: How to add dir to path
Message-ID: <5da176070708071102r55686535tefc67986cd6c834f@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_111103_19706612.1186509744491"
------=_Part_111103_19706612.1186509744491
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi Nyizsnyik,
On 8/7/07, Nyizsnyik Ferenc <nyizsa@bluebottle.com> wrote:
I would rather you checked your ~/.bash_profile file.
>
What's the reason I shouldn't touch /etc/profile but use
~/.bash_profile instead?
Manon.
------=_Part_111103_19706612.1186509744491
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi <span class="gmail_quote">Nyizsnyik,</span><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/7/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Nyizsnyik Ferenc</b> <<a href="mailto:nyizsa@bluebottle.com">nyizsa@bluebottle.com</a>> wrote:
<br></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">I would rather you checked your ~/.bash_profile file.<br></blockquote></div><br>
<br>What's the reason I shouldn't touch /etc/profile but use<br>~/.bash_profile instead?<br><br>Manon.<br><br><br>
------=_Part_111103_19706612.1186509744491--
End of debian-user-digest Digest V2007 Issue #2120
**************************************************
Received on Tue Aug 7 14:20:43 2007