Pantek Library
Hosting Provided By
CybrHost
High Speed Hosting

debian-user-digest Digest V2007 #2476

From: <debian-user-digest-request(at)lists.debian.org>
Date: Wed Sep 26 2007 - 11:13:48 EDT


Content-Type: text/plain

debian-user-digest Digest Volume 2007 : Issue 2476

Today's Topics:

  Re: Who is altering my hostname?      [ "Douglas A. Tutty"  ]
  Re: wireless keyboard encryption      [ Celejar  ]
  Re: Who is altering my hostname?      [ Florian Lindner  ]
  Re: OT: Choice of OOo and LaTeX (Was  [ Johannes Wiedersich  ]
  Re: Openoffice file takes a long tim  [ Ralph Katz  ]
  Re: Who is altering my hostname?      [ Florian Lindner  ]
  ASCII Formatter Whose Name I've Forg  [ Martin McCormick 
  Re: OT: Choice of OOo and LaTeX (Was  [ Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org> ]
  Re: ASCII Formatter Whose Name I've   [ Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> ]

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:33:03 -0400
From: "Douglas A. Tutty" <dtutty@porchlight.ca> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Who is altering my hostname?

Message-ID: <20070926133303.GC6562@titan.hooton>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 12:35:44PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2007-09-26 00:04:26 +0200, Florian Lindner wrote:
> > What could this make happen? In /etc/init.d/ there is nothing like a dhcp
> > client. I have also removed some packages with dhcp in their names.
> >
> > Any idea what makes these two files changing and how to avoid it?
>
> It seems to be a dhcp client (but I don't know why). Have you checked
> that pump isn't installed?
>
> Or perhaps resolvconf does this if it is installed (on one of my
> machines, it got installed automatically and modified some files,
> which was annoying as I use netenv).
>
> Also, you should look at the mtime of the modified files and look
> at your log files if something special occurred at this time (or
> a few seconds earlier).

Have you checked the scripts in /etc/network/if-up.d and if-pre-up.d?

Doug.

Do you need help?X

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:53:54 -0400
From: "Douglas A. Tutty" <dtutty@porchlight.ca> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: wireless keyboard encryption

Message-ID: <20070926125354.GB6562@titan.hooton>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 01:27:06AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> [catching up on a d-u backlog]
>
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:23:07 -0600
> Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > I think you'll find that even "good" wireless keyboards won't easily
> > penetrate more than a single wall of your home, and won't extend very
> > far past an exterior wall in most setups, if at all. I can't even
> > put the receiver under the 1 1/2" thick wooden desk on top of the
> > computer without some glitches -- these devices use VERY low RF
> > output... at least the ones I own.
>
> Doesn't penetration vary *inversely* with the frequency?

Yes but this is a non-sequeter. VERY low RF output implies power not frequency. To be concise: penetration will vary directly with power and inversely with frequency. We won't get into antennal _length_ :)

Doug.

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:57:14 -0500
From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: How do I know debian has detected all my hardware?

Message-ID: <46FA653A.1010408@cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Do you need more help?X

On 09/26/07 08:37, robin putters wrote:
> On 9/26/07, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote:

>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 09/25/07 18:44, Kevin Mark wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 02:29:45AM -0700, Amit Uttamchandani
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>
>>>> I recently installed etch on this old laptop and have no
Can we help you?X
>>>> problems with it whatsoever. I had no hardware issues or >>>> anything. It "seemed" like all the hardware was automatically >>>> detected. Now the question is, how do I know for sure? I know I >>>> could use lspci or something like that. But what do you guys >>>> suggest? I mean is there a "System Profiler" / "Device Manager" >>>> under linux? >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>> In Gnome, look at: 'System' menu->preferences->Hardware info >> Really? I don't see it. >>

>
> I guess he means hal-device manager
>
> ~$ sudo apt-get install hal-device-manager
> ~$ hal-device-manager
>
> should do it :).

Ah, ok. I've already got that installed.

System->Administration->"Device Manager"

  • -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA

Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG+mU6S9HxQb37XmcRArrJAJoDizS1ivbGvt2U44gE+CffEgkGiACeJU2u P55wrKP3dew0cnQjLH4j9kU=
=Xya3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:57:57 -0400
From: Celejar <celejar@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: wireless keyboard encryption

Message-Id: <20070926095757.5ea04b64.celejar@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:53:54 -0400
"Douglas A. Tutty" <dtutty@porchlight.ca> wrote:

Can't find what you're looking for?X

> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 01:27:06AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > [catching up on a d-u backlog]
> >
> > On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:23:07 -0600
> > Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com> wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > I think you'll find that even "good" wireless keyboards won't easily
> > > penetrate more than a single wall of your home, and won't extend very
> > > far past an exterior wall in most setups, if at all. I can't even
> > > put the receiver under the 1 1/2" thick wooden desk on top of the
> > > computer without some glitches -- these devices use VERY low RF
> > > output... at least the ones I own.
> >
> > Doesn't penetration vary *inversely* with the frequency?
>
> Yes but this is a non-sequeter. VERY low RF output implies power not
> frequency. To be concise: penetration will vary directly with power
> and inversely with frequency. We won't get into antennal _length_ :)
>
> Doug.

I misunderstood the OP's syntax; I thought 'VERY low' modified 'radio frequency' rather than '[power] output'.

Celejar

--
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:09:02 +0200 From: Florian Lindner <mailinglists@xgm.de> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Cc: "Douglas A. Tutty" <dtutty@porchlight.ca> Subject: Re: Who is altering my hostname? Message-Id: <200709261609.02471.mailinglists@xgm.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Am Mittwoch, 26. September 2007 schrieb Douglas A. Tutty:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 12:35:44PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2007-09-26 00:04:26 +0200, Florian Lindner wrote:
> > > What could this make happen? In /etc/init.d/ there is nothing like a
> > > dhcp client. I have also removed some packages with dhcp in their
> > > names.
> > >
> > > Any idea what makes these two files changing and how to avoid it?
> >
> > It seems to be a dhcp client (but I don't know why). Have you checked
> > that pump isn't installed?
> >
> > Or perhaps resolvconf does this if it is installed (on one of my
> > machines, it got installed automatically and modified some files,
> > which was annoying as I use netenv).
> >
> > Also, you should look at the mtime of the modified files and look
> > at your log files if something special occurred at this time (or
> > a few seconds earlier).
>
> Have you checked the scripts in /etc/network/if-up.d and if-pre-up.d?
if-up.d contains only mountntf and if-down.d is empty? Is is possible that this change of hostnames is somehow enfored by the virtualization? (Virtuozzo) Regards, Florian

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:11:09 -0400 From: Neil Watson <debian@watson-wilson.ca> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: OT: Choice of OOo and LaTeX (Was: Tool for document management) Message-ID: <20070926141109.GD30292@watson-wilson.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Please approach this subject in a more subjective manner. I was suggesting that until you gain experience with both manners of document creation you can hardly form an accurate conclusion as to what best suits your needs. -- Neil Watson | Debian Linux System Administrator | Uptime 11 days http://watson-wilson.ca

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:16:06 +0200 From: Johannes Wiedersich <johannes@physik.blm.tu-muenchen.de> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: OT: Choice of OOo and LaTeX (Was: Tool for document management) Message-Id: <46FA69A6.4080908@physik.blm.tu-muenchen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steve Lamb wrote:
> The ultimate irony is that the end result of all this evangelical blather
> for LaTeX has resulted in people suggesting extremely convoluted methods of
> achieving a simple requirement in OOo. Convert LaTeX to HTML and then from
> HTML to Word! That is reasonable?!
Yes. Reasonable, simple, efficient. (Unfortunately the way from word to LaTeX is not nearly that efficient if not impossible.) Note, that you said that you don't know yet, if you need .doc at all, since the manuscript is not finished and you don't know for sure that .doc is a requirement for the publishers you will be sending your manuscript to.
> The most amusing part is that people have
> suggested using a WYSIWYG editor for LaTeX... and use LaTeX because the
> WYSIWYG editor called OOo is bad because it is WYSIWYG. A-wha!?
No. The reason for suggesting WYSIWYG editors was that you said you are not comfortable with other editors. The rationale behind it is that those editors will store your files in LaTeX-format, which is plain text and *extremely* suitable for version control -- opposed to OOo. Johannes NB: Why don't *I* like to write texts in WYSIWYG? - - the fonts I use for the editor are optimized for (my) readability on my screen at my resolution; the fonts I use for the printout are optimized for the printout - - the printed text is black and white; the computer screen is colour. My editor shows colour highlighting on screen, but will produce b/w output. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG+mmmC1NzPRl9qEURAgBXAJ9rzd4+Uj+A+Rx7Yu8Jrp5d8gwzqACfYZOy E2y3NhcURuG8FPzqc6QUW3s= =0lus -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:18:08 -0700 From: Kevin Sulonen <kevins@pcf.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Who is altering my hostname? Message-ID: <46FA6A20.8000206@pcf.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060509020203090705090309" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060509020203090705090309 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2007-09-26 00:04:26 +0200, Florian Lindner wrote:
>
>> What could this make happen? In /etc/init.d/ there is nothing like a dhcp >> client. I have also removed some packages with dhcp in their names. >> >> Any idea what makes these two files changing and how to avoid it? >> >
> It seems to be a dhcp client (but I don't know why). Have you checked
> that pump isn't installed?
>
> Or perhaps resolvconf does this if it is installed (on one of my
> machines, it got installed automatically and modified some files,
> which was annoying as I use netenv).
>
> Also, you should look at the mtime of the modified files and look
> at your log files if something special occurred at this time (or
> a few seconds earlier).
>
Hi: Please forgive me if this has already been suggested, but I encountered a similar problem running Lenny. Try getting rid of networkmanager. I actually wound up purging this utility. There are probably more elegant ways to make it behave, but I felt foolish enough after I discovered what was causing the problem that I found the exercise distinctly satisfying. Hope that helps, Kevin --------------060509020203090705090309 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Vincent Lefevre wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:%3C20070926103544.GO25775@prunille.vinc17.org%3E" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On 2007-09-26 00:04:26 +0200, Florian Lindner wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">What could this make happen? In /etc/init.d/ there is nothing like a dhcp client. I have also removed some packages with dhcp in their names. Any idea what makes these two files changing and how to avoid it? </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""><!----> It seems to be a dhcp client (but I don't know why). Have you checked that pump isn't installed? Or perhaps resolvconf does this if it is installed (on one of my machines, it got installed automatically and modified some files, which was annoying as I use netenv). Also, you should look at the mtime of the modified files and look at your log files if something special occurred at this time (or a few seconds earlier). </pre> </blockquote> H<tt>i:<br> <br> Please forgive me if this has already been suggested, but I encountered a similar problem running Lenny. Try getting rid of networkmanager. I actually wound up purging this utility. There are probably more elegant ways to make it behave, but I felt foolish enough after I discovered what was causing the problem that I found the exercise distinctly satisfying.<br> <br> Hope that helps,<br> Kevin<br> </tt><br> </body> </html> --------------060509020203090705090309--

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:29:50 +0200 From: Johannes Wiedersich <johannes@physik.blm.tu-muenchen.de> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: OT: Choice of OOo and LaTeX (Was: Tool for document management) Message-Id: <46FA6CDE.5030004@physik.blm.tu-muenchen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steve Lamb wrote:
> Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>> I hope I didn't state that you are wrong, that's not my intention.
>
> By refuting my personal opinion so emphatically even if you haven't said
> the word the sentiment is clear.
>
>> - From my personal experience LaTeX *is the tool* when it comes to
>
> You personal experience is not *MY* personal experience.
True. But my personal experience includes quite a bit of work with word, OOo *and* LaTeX. [snip]
> But does not fit the requirement of easily converted to an acceptable
> format or being able to work visually with it. No, I am not counting LyX and
> the like because to suggest a WYSIWYG editor for LaTeX who's stringent
> proponents eschew WYSIWYG is to put oneself right back at the same level as
> any other tool.
LaTeX, especially without formulas or too complicated formatting, is easily converted to many different acceptable formats: HTML, pdf, plain text, etc. The route via HTML to OOo and .doc is straightforward for the situation you describe. [snip]
> Yeah, EMACS, not working for me. And as for "one less than OOo's CNTL-I"
> that depends, do you cound a chord as one keystroke or two? Most people don't
> count the chord for capitalization as two keystrokes. Is FIVE 8 keystrokes, 5
> keystrokes or 4 keystrokes? Chording is a part of typing, as any EMACS user
> is well aware. :P
I didn't want to do hair splitting. I just used the example to convince you that you don't require to type '\textit{}' all the times you need italics. texmacs is not emacs! See www.texmacs.org. Johannes PS: Your other remarks have already been answered in another post on this thread. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG+mzeC1NzPRl9qEURAvnDAJ4ttEjJcpnun/sTABHmGcF/aPJA7QCaAysk WwHt+lq0r8iUQwlnUbA+d8E= =CPqm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Don't know where to look next?X

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:57:32 +0200 From: Jochen Schulz <ml@well-adjusted.de> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: It's 3am and I have no caffeine Message-ID: <20070926145732.GL4782@wasteland.homelinux.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nywXBoy70X0GaB8B" Content-Disposition: inline --nywXBoy70X0GaB8B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chuck Payne: >=20
> Now I am trying to get count to work with zgrep. When I do zgrep -c, I ge=
t=20
> a what I am looking for and not a count. Anyway try to play with it to=20
> figure before I crash.
You may have to resort to this: gunzip -c foo_file.gz | grep -c bar_pattern J. --=20 When I get home from the supermarket I don't know what to do with all the plastic. [Agree] [Disagree] <http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html> --nywXBoy70X0GaB8B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG+nNc+AfZydWK2zkRAlwpAKCL6/BVk/4ZvFhFTo5i4vemXh1r6wCeLrRS ljege7NjTRmvFKoit2g4bVw= =/w0F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nywXBoy70X0GaB8B--

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:57:48 -0400 From: Ralph Katz <ralph.katz@rcn.com> To: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Subject: Re: Openoffice file takes a long time to open Message-ID: <46FA736C.4080102@rcn.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09/26/2007 09:21 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 09/26/07 05:15, John O Laoi wrote:
>> Hello, >> I am running Etch on a Dell Precision laptop. >> I have one openoffice file, say XYZ.odt, which takes a long time to open >> (maybe 25 minutes). >> While it is opening, Openoffice is stalled.
>
> No surprise there.
>
>> It is not big. ls-l reports its size as 18,000. >> I have many much bigger files which open immediately.
>
> Maybe it's *highly* compressed and most of the time is spent in
> zlib. I've seen examples of corner cases that take forever to open.
>
>> I copied the file to SUSE linux that I have on a desktop, and the file >> opened quickly.
>
> You neglect to mention the specs of the 2 machines. Maybe the
> desktop is 10x faster?
>
>> I tried changing its name. >> I tried copying its contents to a new file. >> I made a copy of the file (using cp). >> I had some URLs in the file, which I changed to text (removed the blue and >> underline) >> I ran fsck on the filesystem on which it resides, and it reported no bad >> blocks.
>
>> Any ideas where I look?
>
> Run top in an xterm. See if OOo is sucking a lot of CPU.
Also check your disk i/o for swapping. I recently worked on a 4.8kb OOo document that sucked in 8 images of 1.1Mb/each. It was a simple letter sized page with embedded images. Working on that doc brought the old 500Mhz PIII to a crawl under etch, but it loaded and rendered in a minute or 2, not 25 mins! Also, check whether any other unusual objects are embedded or called somehow. Perhaps some object is not loading, re-trying, and finally timing out. Just a guess... Good luck, Ralph

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:42:53 +0200 From: Florian Lindner <mailinglists@xgm.de> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Cc: Kevin Sulonen <kevins@pcf.com> Subject: Re: Who is altering my hostname? Message-Id: <200709261642.54044.mailinglists@xgm.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Am Mittwoch, 26. September 2007 schrieb Kevin Sulonen:
> Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2007-09-26 00:04:26 +0200, Florian Lindner wrote:
> >> What could this make happen? In /etc/init.d/ there is nothing like a
> >> dhcp client. I have also removed some packages with dhcp in their names.
> >>
> >> Any idea what makes these two files changing and how to avoid it?
> >
> > It seems to be a dhcp client (but I don't know why). Have you checked
> > that pump isn't installed?
> >
> > Or perhaps resolvconf does this if it is installed (on one of my
> > machines, it got installed automatically and modified some files,
> > which was annoying as I use netenv).
> >
> > Also, you should look at the mtime of the modified files and look
> > at your log files if something special occurred at this time (or
> > a few seconds earlier).
>
> Hi:
>
> Please forgive me if this has already been suggested, but I encountered
> a similar problem running Lenny. Try getting rid of networkmanager.
What package do you mean? http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=networkmanager&searchon=names&suite=stable&section=all says that there is no package named networkmanager. Regards, Florian
> I
> actually wound up purging this utility. There are probably more elegant
> ways to make it behave, but I felt foolish enough after I discovered
> what was causing the problem that I found the exercise distinctly
> satisfying.
>
> Hope that helps,
> Kevin

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:47:17 +0200 From: steef <steefvanduin@zonnet.nl> To: debian <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Subject: [Fwd: Re: canon printer driver question] Message-ID: <46FA70F5.8070408@zonnet.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: canon printer driver question Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:46:07 +0200 From: steef <steefvanduin@zonnet.nl> Reply-To: steefvanduin@zonnet.nl To: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com> References: <46F8E127.5000003@zonnet.nl> <20070925145317.GA17869@localhost.localdomain> by accident i sent this answer too to your private emailaddress. apologize! steef Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 12:21:27PM +0200, steef wrote:
>
>> hi, >> >> does anybody know if the gutenprint driver canon ip2000 pixma also works >> with the canon ip2500 pixma? >> >
> I can only answer indirectly: the ip1500 pixma does *not* work with
> the ip200 pixma driver. There is a repository
>
> deb http://mambo.kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~takushi/debian ./
>
> that carries packages for some of the pixma line and there are several of
> them, there. YOu may find one that works for you.
>
> web page: http://mambo.kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~takushi/
>
> hth
>
> A
>
thanks andrew. guess i can manage now. reg., steef

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:47:09 -0500 From: Martin McCormick <martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: ASCII Formatter Whose Name I've Forgotten Message-Id: <200709261447.l8QEl9Jf069002@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <69000.1190818029.1@dc.cis.okstate.edu> I remember reading about a UNIX utility whose name escapes me. You feed it ASCII text and it breaks lines as near to a desired length as possible without splitting words. Anyone remember the name of this utility? Thanks. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK Systems Engineer OSU Information Technology Department Network Operations Group Of all the things in life I've lost, I miss my mind the most.

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:42:49 -0700 From: michael@estone.ca To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Debian install to Inspiron 530 with SATA DVD drive Message-ID: <20070926074249.qffvub9u5cgo4kgk@estone.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Quoting Simon <greminn@gmail.com>: >
> Thanks for that... have downloaded the lastest snapshot and it booted
> no issues. Now it wont find the network card. sigh... its a intel
> e1000 i think.
>
> Is it easier to just put a new network card in it?
Could be, An old 3com or something may help, but I would guess that the kernel should support the e1000 nic. On a similar desktop machine, (intel board 965 chipset), I had the exact same problems as you. I eventually gave up and used a usb stick to install Debian. A good how to is here: http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/i386/ch04s04.html Mike

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:09:55 -0700 From: Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: OT: Choice of OOo and LaTeX (Was: Tool for document management) Message-ID: <46FA7643.20308@dmiyu.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0C1DA3FACD895AF43FB5CCF4" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0C1DA3FACD895AF43FB5CCF4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Neil Watson wrote:
> Please approach this subject in a more subjective manner. I was
> suggesting that until you gain experience with both manners of
> document creation you can hardly form an accurate conclusion as to what=

> best suits your needs.
Until you've tried a vacuum you can't say you can't breathe in one. --=20 Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream? PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do... -------------------------------+-----------------------------------------= ---- --------------enig0C1DA3FACD895AF43FB5CCF4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG+nZDel/srYtumcURAhisAKCKCAn0tdjdur4brHpFX38ZuXizOwCdEMfi ud246ZVXnS27TRyK0CkLlSI= =qrrh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0C1DA3FACD895AF43FB5CCF4--

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:54:29 -0400 From: Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: ASCII Formatter Whose Name I've Forgotten Message-Id: <20070926105429.2fdd6b26.celejar@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:47:09 -0500 Martin McCormick <martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu> wrote:
> I remember reading about a UNIX utility whose name
> escapes me. You feed it ASCII text and it breaks lines as near
> to a desired length as possible without splitting words. Anyone
> remember the name of this utility?
>
> Thanks.
fmt -w nnn?
> Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK
Celejar -- mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator End of debian-user-digest Digest V2007 Issue #2476 ************************************************** Received on Wed Sep 26 11:13:58 2007

Confused? Frustrated?X

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Oct 07 2007 - 07:55:12 EDT


Contact Us  Legal Notices  Order Services Online 
Pantek Home  Privacy Policy  IT news  Site Map  Pantek Library